gcc archive
date index for February, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 28, 2002
23:12 Redundant entries in .la files Roger W.Brown
23:02 Re: FW: I hate to ask this question (.la files and depends) Phil Edwards
22:58 Re: successful build on solaris2.9!!! Phil Edwards
22:51 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler David O'Brien
22:33 Re: suggestions for messages about successful builds gnat-dev
21:56 RE: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Daniel Berlin
20:44 problem with register spilling Danish Samad
20:32 RE: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Robert Dewar
20:28 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Robert Dewar
20:21 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Robert Dewar
17:58 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
17:35 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
17:19 successful build on solaris2.9!!! George.R.Goffe
17:12 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Phil Edwards
17:10 rpath editors (was Re: Installation proposal) Zack Weinberg
16:42 Re: build status for cross builds? Janis Johnson
16:34 Re: Successful build gcc 3.0.4 redhat 7.2 success Janis Johnson
16:33 Re: Successful build of GCC: Janis Johnson
16:33 Re: GCC 3.0.4 build reports Janis Johnson
16:32 Re: Successful build of GCC 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
15:59 changes to build status list Janis Johnson
15:16 Re: Installation proposal Richard Henderson
15:12 SPEC95 pages now tracking SPECfp Diego Novillo
15:04 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Richard Henderson
15:01 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Jakub Jelinek
14:47 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler David O'Brien
14:29 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
14:28 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Dale Johannesen
14:25 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
14:09 Re: Installation proposal Per Bothner
14:06 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Alex Rosenberg
14:04 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Alex Rosenberg
13:47 Re: Installation proposal Alexandre Oliva
13:44 Re: Installation proposal Alexandre Oliva
12:56 Re: Cannot bootstrap on ia64-suse-linux Richard Henderson
12:40 TFmode support with and without INTEL_EXTENDED_IEEE_FORMAT Steve Ellcey
12:17 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
11:51 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl James Michael DuPont
11:46 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Joe Buck
11:40 Re: Installation proposal mike stump
11:22 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl mike stump
11:07 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault mike stump
11:04 RE: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Bernard Dautrevaux
10:53 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Neil Booth
10:50 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Zack Weinberg
10:36 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Daniel Berlin
10:27 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Olivier Hainque
10:01 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Diego Novillo
09:49 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Joe Buck
09:44 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Richard Henderson
09:42 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Diego Novillo
09:33 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Jan Hubicka
09:22 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
09:18 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Diego Novillo
09:14 Get a grip. Yves Orton
09:03 Re: Installation proposal Per Bothner
08:54 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc-3.1-cvs on sparc-linux using binutils-2.12-cvs as of 2002-02-28 Jakub Jelinek
08:52 Re: Recent removal of the 'aux' field in tree_common Geoff Keating
08:48 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl James Michael DuPont
08:26 Re: Pb /libg2c.a(open.o): In function `f_open'... Andreas Jaeger
08:26 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
08:07 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
08:02 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc-3.1-cvs on sparc-linux using binutils-2.12-cvs as of 2002-02-28 Christian J鰊sson
07:55 Re: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl Joe Buck
07:39 Can't bootstrap gcc-3.1-cvs on sparc-linux using binutils-2.12-cvs as of 2002-02-28 Christian J鰊sson
07:34 Pb /libg2c.a(open.o): In function `f_open'... Philippe SENOT
07:30 Re: flag_traditional patch mistakenly applied to GCC 3.1 branch? Jason Merrill
07:17 flag_traditional patch mistakenly applied to GCC 3.1 branch? David Edelsohn
07:02 Re: 3.1 branched, trunk open? David Edelsohn
06:49 Re: Question for successful cygwin/gcc builders Christopher Faylor
06:46 3.1 branched, trunk open? Andrew Cagney
06:39 Re: Please help me Alexander Poquet
06:30 Successful build gcc 3.0.4 redhat 7.2 success Petr Gladkikh
06:21 Please help me Mirek Marciniszyn
06:10 Successful build of GCC: Martin Villarreal
06:08 Re: Copying SI regs as HI subregs Alan Lehotsky
04:58 承接各类印刷业务 陈先生
04:04 Cannot bootstrap on ia64-suse-linux Andreas Schwab
02:25 Copying SI regs as HI subregs D. Towner
02:21 Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl James Michael DuPont
02:02 Re: Installation proposal Alexandre Oliva
01:54 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Olivier Hainque
01:46 Re: Installation proposal Joseph S. Myers
01:43 Re: Installing libjava fails Alexandre Oliva
01:39 Re: Installing libjava fails Andreas Schwab
01:13 Re: undefined reference Paolo Carlini
01:11 Re: Installation proposal Akim Demaille
01:11 Re: Installation proposal Akim Demaille
00:49 undefined reference gcc
00:42 Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Alexandre Oliva
00:06 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
00:04 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Richard Henderson
00:02 Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Bryce McKinlay

February 27, 2002
23:58 Re: Installation proposal Richard Henderson
23:35 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Marc Espie
23:29 Re: gcc-3.0.4 bootstrapped on armv5l-unknown-linux-gnu jeroen dobbelaere
22:59 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Mark Mitchell
22:40 Re: Question for successful Cygwin/gcc builders Christian J鰊sson
22:07 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
21:46 Re: Compiling boost with gcc 3.1 Craig Rodrigues
21:39 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
21:39 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
20:17 Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Alexandre Oliva
19:56 RE: Question for successful Cygwin/gcc builders Dockeen
19:54 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Albert Chin
19:54 Re: exceptions without libstdc++-v3? Alexandre Oliva
19:49 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Dale Johannesen
19:38 Re: what does -mthreads do? Adam Megacz
19:37 Re: exceptions without libstdc++-v3? Adam Megacz
19:36 Re: Question for successful Cygwin/gcc builders Robert Dewar
19:35 Re: exceptions without libstdc++-v3? Jeff Sturm
19:35 what does -mthreads do? Adam Megacz
19:35 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Kumar Gala
19:32 Question for successful Cygwin/gcc builders Dockeen
19:22 Re: exceptions without libstdc++-v3? Alexandre Oliva
19:06 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
19:05 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
18:59 Re: exceptions without libstdc++-v3? Adam Megacz
18:51 Re: exceptions without libstdc++-v3? Phil Edwards
18:46 exceptions without libstdc++-v3? Adam Megacz
18:33 Re: Installing libjava fails Alexandre Oliva
18:32 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Alex Rosenberg
18:30 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
18:30 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
18:28 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
18:27 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
18:20 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
18:16 Re: Installation proposal Alexandre Oliva
18:14 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
18:12 Re: Installation proposal cgd
18:06 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Daniel Egger
18:05 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Daniel Egger
18:02 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
18:00 Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Benjamin Kosnik
17:59 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Robert Dewar
17:55 Re: Installation proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
17:51 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
17:51 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
17:47 Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Alexandre Oliva
17:47 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Richard Henderson
17:45 Re: Installation proposal Alexandre Oliva
17:43 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
17:42 Re: Installation proposal Richard Henderson
17:38 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Geoff Keating
17:37 Re: Compiling boost with gcc 3.1 Benjamin Kosnik
17:28 Re: Installation proposal Alexandre Oliva
17:25 Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Benjamin Kosnik
17:23 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Alex Rosenberg
17:20 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Richard Henderson
17:19 Re: Request on memory allocation Tim Prince
17:18 Re: Installation proposal Richard Henderson
16:43 Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Alexandre Oliva
16:27 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
16:11 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault David Edelsohn
16:10 Re: gcc no longer understands win32 '__try' extension? Adam Megacz
16:08 Re: Installation proposal Loren James Rittle
15:52 Re: gcc no longer understands win32 '__try' extension? Richard Henderson
15:39 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Kumar Gala
15:37 Re: gcc no longer understands win32 '__try' extension? Jeff Sturm
15:27 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
15:19 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Daniel Egger
15:16 Re: warning: assignment to `int' from `double' Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
15:09 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
15:06 gcc no longer understands win32 '__try' extension? Adam Megacz
14:56 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Daniel Egger
14:56 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Daniel Egger
14:55 Re: Installation proposal Nathan Sidwell
14:43 Re: Installation proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
13:49 Re: Installation proposal Richard Henderson
13:22 Re: Installation proposal Laurent Guerby
13:08 GCC 3.0.4 build reports Graham Reed
13:05 Re: Installation proposal mike stump
12:57 Re: PATCH: Tidy C++ testsuite Neil Booth
12:52 Re: Installation proposal Michael Meissner
12:34 PATCH: Tidy C++ testsuite Mark Mitchell
12:19 Re: Installation proposal Neil Booth
12:17 FW: I hate to ask this question (.la files and depends) James A. Cleland
12:15 Re: Compiling boost with gcc 3.1 Paolo Carlini
12:11 Re: Installation proposal Jim Wilson
12:10 Re: suggestions for messages about successful builds Lars Brinkhoff
11:53 Re: Installation proposal Zack Weinberg
11:53 Re: Installation proposal Joseph S. Myers
11:41 Re: Installation proposal Joseph S. Myers
11:30 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.4 on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 and Janis Johnson
11:26 Re: Successful Install of gcc-3.0.3 on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Janis Johnson
11:25 Re: warning: assignment to `int' from `double' Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
11:23 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
11:18 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
11:14 Re: Installation proposal Jim Wilson
11:14 Re: Installation proposal Per Bothner
11:13 Re: Compiling boost with gcc 3.1 Benjamin Kosnik
11:07 Re: suggestions for messages about successful builds Einar Karttunen
11:07 Re: warning: assignment to `int' from `double' Neil Booth
11:05 Re: Installation proposal Tom Tromey
11:04 Re: Installation proposal Benjamin Kosnik
11:04 Re: Installation proposal Laurent Guerby
11:02 Re: Installation proposal Joel Sherrill
10:59 Re: Installation proposal Joseph S. Myers
10:50 Re: Installation proposal Stan Shebs
10:49 Re: Installation proposal Jim Wilson
10:48 Re: Installation proposal Paul Koning
10:45 Successful build of gcc-3.0.4 on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 and Martin Gansser
10:29 Re: Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
10:26 suggestions for messages about successful builds Janis Johnson
10:25 warning: assignment to `int' from `double' Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
10:13 Re: Installation proposal David Edelsohn
10:11 Re: Installation proposal H . J . Lu
10:06 Successful build of GCC 3.0.4 Andrew Sayman
09:56 Installation proposal Mark Mitchell
09:54 Re: Sucessful build - gcc3.0.4 - hp10.20 Janis Johnson
09:49 Successful Install of gcc-3.0.3 on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Ed Mackenty
09:49 Re: Sucessful build - gcc3.0.4 - hp10.20 Janis Johnson
09:44 Re: gcc-3.0.4 bootstrapped on armv5l-unknown-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
09:42 Re: Successful build on HPUX 11.00 Janis Johnson
09:40 Re: 3.0.4 built/tested on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
09:38 Re: Successful build of gcc 3.0.4 on Solaris 2.6 Janis Johnson
09:36 Re: Request on memory allocation Joe Buck
09:29 Re: Sucessful build - gcc3.0.4 - hp10.20 Joe Buck
09:24 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Richard Henderson
09:17 Re: 3.1 branch check-in policy questions Mark Mitchell
08:56 Sucessful build - gcc3.0.4 - hp10.20 Patrick Lagace
07:59 Re: RTL generation patterns Jan Hubicka
07:10 Re: RTL generation patterns Dmitry
07:04 Re: RTL generation patterns Richard Earnshaw
07:00 Re: 3.1 branch check-in policy questions Jan Hubicka
06:56 Re: RTL generation patterns Jan Hubicka
06:49 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Olivier Hainque
06:03 Re: Porting GCC to a register-less, stack-less architecture Alexandre Courbot
06:02 RTL generation patterns Danish Samad
05:20 Re: Porting GCC to a register-less, stack-less architecture Alan Lehotsky
05:17 gcc-3.0.4 bootstrapped on armv5l-unknown-linux-gnu jeroen dobbelaere
05:06 RE: findfirst Rupert Wood
04:54 findfirst qj002a
04:33 Porting GCC to a register-less, stack-less architecture Alexandre Courbot
04:17 ATI Technologies Inc. Canada - Email submission ATI Technologies Inc. Canada
04:11 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Olivier Hainque
04:09 Dwarf2 failure with Ada Richard Kenner
04:00 3.1 branch check-in policy questions Richard Kenner
02:41 Successful build on HPUX 11.00 Bert De Knuydt

February 26, 2002
23:39 Request on memory allocation Joerg Ettrich
21:59 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
21:38 Compiling boost with gcc 3.1 Craig Rodrigues
21:30 Re: rtl understanding till what level? Fergus Henderson
18:47 Re: rtl understanding till what level? Bryce McKinlay
18:41 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
18:35 rtl understanding till what level? rashmi kankaria
17:45 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Jeff Sturm
16:17 3.0.4 built/tested on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu Steve Christiansen
15:25 Successful build of gcc 3.0.4 on Solaris 2.6 Adrian Pasciuta
15:23 RFA: merging dfa-branch into the main trunk Vladimir Makarov
14:39 Re: short integer multiplication problem on IA64 Richard Henderson
14:30 Re: Conditionalizing the GCC documents Stan Shebs
14:12 Conditionalizing the GCC documents Bill Cox
13:30 Re: short integer multiplication problem on IA64 Reva Cuthbertson
13:16 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Aldy Hernandez
12:53 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Build on Athlon Janis Johnson
12:52 Re: gcc 3.0.4 on alpha osf5.1 Janis Johnson
12:52 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.4 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
12:49 Re: Successful build, make check of 3.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.4 Janis Johnson
12:18 Re: Problem when compiling Tim Prince
11:55 Re: how to force reloader(?) to respect clobber directive? Dimmy
11:47 gcc 3.0.4 on alpha osf5.1 S Cowles
11:41 Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Jason Merrill
11:34 Re: how to force reloader(?) to respect clobber directive? Jan Hubicka
11:27 Re: how to force reloader(?) to respect clobber directive? Dimmy
11:17 Re: Installing libjava fails Andreas Schwab
10:58 Re: The G++ Internals manual isn't online at your site Craig Rodrigues
10:47 The G++ Internals manual isn't online at your site Adam Dingle
10:26 Re: Combine on IA-64 Richard Henderson
10:25 Re: short integer multiplication problem on IA64 Richard Henderson
10:14 Re: Combine on IA-64 Jakub Jelinek
10:12 Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Richard Henderson
10:12 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Daniel Egger
10:08 Re: Combine on IA-64 Richard Henderson
10:00 Re: LINK_SPEC question Bo Thorsen
09:55 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Build on Athlon Jack Lloyd
09:52 Re: PATCH: Improve version tagging Mark Mitchell
09:51 Re: PATCH: Improve version tagging Joseph S. Myers
09:46 Re: LINK_SPEC question Richard Henderson
09:45 Re: how to force reloader(?) to respect clobber directive? Richard Henderson
09:44 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Joe Buck
09:27 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Mark Mitchell
09:25 Re: Problem when compiling Craig Rodrigues
09:16 Re: PATCH: Improve version tagging Mark Mitchell
09:12 short integer multiplication problem on IA64 Reva Cuthbertson
09:07 Re: Successful Build with Suse 7.3 / 2.4.16 3.04 Janis Johnson
09:06 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Build on Athlon Janis Johnson
08:57 Problem when compiling samir idrissi
08:45 Re: SUBREG_BYTE question Bernd Schmidt
08:38 Re: SUBREG_BYTE question Jakub Jelinek
08:37 Successful build, make check of 3.0.3 on FreeBSD 4.4 William C. Cox
08:27 Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault David Edelsohn
08:25 Re: SUBREG_BYTE question Bernd Schmidt
08:11 GCC 3.0.4 Build on Athlon Jack Lloyd
07:39 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Corey Minyard
07:39 Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler Olivier Hainque
07:32 Warnings while building cross-compiler David =?ISO-8859-15?Q?M=FCller
07:07 gcc 3.0.4 + PR3145.patch patch Frank Pilhofer
06:18 Re: rtl dependency Alan Lehotsky
05:59 rtl dependency Danish Samad
05:50 Combine on IA-64 Jakub Jelinek
05:46 Re: SUBREG_BYTE question Graham Stott
05:39 Re: SUBREG_BYTE question Jakub Jelinek
05:35 SUBREG_BYTE question Bernd Schmidt
05:18 Re: GCC 2.8.1 !! Craig Rodrigues
05:17 Re: builtin_types_compatible_p and const Daniel Egger
05:17 Re: [PATCH] Fix AltiVec mergel RTL patterns Daniel Egger
05:17 [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault Daniel Egger
05:17 Re: [TESTCASE] gcc miscompiles Altivec code Daniel Egger
04:56 Still have Sparc problems Richard Kenner
04:45 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Martin von Loewis
04:42 RE: GCC 2.8.1 !! Stephano Mariani
03:11 Successful Build with Suse 7.3 / 2.4.16 3.04 root
03:06 GCC 2.8.1 !! Suman Kumar G
01:57 LINK_SPEC question Bo Thorsen
01:32 Re: FLT_ROUNDS not always 1? Joseph S. Myers
01:24 Re: builtin_types_compatible_p and const Joseph S. Myers
01:20 RE: Older gcc version ? Rupert Wood
01:19 Re: altivec amusement Joseph S. Myers
01:18 how to force reloader(?) to respect clobber directive? Dmitry
01:07 Using the g++ front end Dave Davies
00:40 Older gcc version ? yinliyin
00:13 Re: PATCH: Improve version tagging Richard Henderson

February 25, 2002
23:27 GCC 3.1 Branch Mark Mitchell
23:15 PATCH: Improve version tagging Mark Mitchell
23:13 Re: problem in compiling gcc 2.9.5 on unixware 7.1.1 Robert Lipe
22:56 Re: common tree nodes question Aldy Hernandez
22:49 Re: [PATCH] Fix AltiVec mergel RTL patterns Aldy Hernandez
22:40 Re: FLT_ROUNDS not always 1? Stan Shebs
22:26 Re: common tree nodes question Aldy Hernandez
22:19 Re: [TESTCASE] AltiVec code uses wrong rtl expression Aldy Hernandez
21:26 Re: FLT_ROUNDS not always 1? Richard Henderson
21:11 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Jim Dehnert
21:11 problem in compiling gcc 2.9.5 on unixware 7.1.1 TaoFengmei
21:10 problem in compiling gcc 2.9.5 on unixware 7.1.1 TaoFengmei
20:49 Re: builtin_types_compatible_p and const Daniel Jacobowitz
20:40 FLT_ROUNDS not always 1? Stan Shebs
20:30 gcc-ss-20020225 is now available gccadmin
20:28 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Stan Shebs
19:10 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch David O'Brien
18:46 Re: [TESTCASE] gcc miscompiles Altivec code Dale Johannesen
18:31 Re: Altivec strangeness? Aldy Hernandez
18:20 Re: common tree nodes question Richard Henderson
18:16 Re: common tree nodes question Aldy Hernandez
18:16 Re: [TESTCASE] gcc miscompiles Altivec code Daniel Egger
18:14 Re: common tree nodes question Richard Henderson
18:12 [PATCH] Fix AltiVec mergel RTL patterns Daniel Egger
17:56 Re: common tree nodes question Aldy Hernandez
17:55 builtin_types_compatible_p and const Aldy Hernandez
17:55 Re: altivec amusement Aldy Hernandez
17:55 Re: [TESTCASE] gcc miscompiles Altivec code Aldy Hernandez
17:40 I need your help !!!! luda_s
17:37 -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc Benjamin Kosnik
17:02 Re: common tree nodes question Richard Henderson
17:00 Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.4 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Gcc k6 testing account
16:56 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
16:43 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Richard Henderson
16:31 New page for you! Attention! Andrey V.
15:54 Re: newlib/libc/include/sys/config.h vs. gcc.dg/cpp/19990407-1.c J. Johnston
15:48 Re: Test plan for GCC 3.1? Janis Johnson
15:42 Re: [TESTCASE] AltiVec code uses wrong rtl expression Daniel Berlin
15:22 Re: [TESTCASE] AltiVec code uses wrong rtl expression Graham Stott
15:10 [TESTCASE] AltiVec code uses wrong rtl expression Daniel Egger
14:57 Re: AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers Aldy Hernandez
14:50 Re: Test distilled from -gdwarf-2 -O3 bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
14:41 RE: 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc-cygwin. Mack Lobell
14:36 newlib/libc/include/sys/config.h vs. gcc.dg/cpp/19990407-1.c Joern Rennecke
14:13 [TESTCASE] gcc miscompiles Altivec code Daniel Egger
14:13 Re: AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers Daniel Egger
13:28 Re: 3.1 doesn't bootstrap on sparcv9 David O'Brien
13:11 Re: Successful build on Tru64, 4.0f Janis Johnson
13:10 Re: Successful 3.0.4 build on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Janis Johnson
13:09 Re: Successfully built GCC 3.0.4 on vax-unknown-netbsd1.5.2 Janis Johnson
13:09 Re: 3.0.4 build status Janis Johnson
13:09 Re: AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers Andrew Pinski
13:08 Re: Successful build of GCC Janis Johnson
13:07 Re: i586-pc-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
13:05 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.4 on i686-pc-cygwin Janis Johnson
13:01 Re: AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers Daniel Egger
11:55 Re: What is a successful build? mike stump
11:22 Re: 3.1 doesn't bootstrap on sparcv9 Brad Lucier
11:10 People experiencing slow libstdc++ configure, please try this test Zack Weinberg
10:41 Re: Concerning the test_summary script mike stump
09:19 Successful build on Tru64, 4.0f Bert De Knuydt
09:11 problems with the compiler bcg qg
09:10 Re: Altivec strangeness? Daniel Egger
08:54 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
08:27 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Alexandre Oliva
08:22 Successful 3.0.4 build on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Reichelt
07:42 Re: ^releases Craig Rodrigues
07:39 ^releases Dilian Palauzov
07:34 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Peter Barada
07:26 Re: sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 7pm Christopher Faylor
07:17 Re: GNAT merge status Geert Bosch
05:45 Re: Altivec strangeness? Daniel Egger
05:39 AW: HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED problems Unruh, Erwin
05:36 Re: AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers [UPDATE] Daniel Egger
05:34 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
04:55 Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4 Jan Hubicka
03:39 3.0.4 build status Alex Achenbach
01:59 Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4 Jakub Jelinek
01:50 Re: Altivec strangeness? Jakub Jelinek
01:22 Re: Performance with IA64 Thomas Hiller
01:00 Re: altivec amusement Joseph S. Myers
00:38 Re: altivec amusement Aldy Hernandez
00:26 common tree nodes question Aldy Hernandez

February 24, 2002
23:26 Re: sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 7pm David O'Brien
23:21 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Mark Mitchell
23:20 Re: PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Mark Mitchell
22:24 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Phil Edwards
22:17 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
22:05 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Phil Edwards
21:46 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Jeff Sturm
21:32 Re: GCC mirrors (bad link) Craig Rodrigues
21:31 Re: GCC mirrors (bad link) Tajiman2
21:22 GCC mirrors (bad link) roie_m
19:59 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
19:45 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Bryce McKinlay
19:39 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Alexandre Oliva
19:35 Re: Test distilled from -gdwarf-2 -O3 bootstrap failure Alexandre Oliva
19:31 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Phil Edwards
19:23 Re: Why -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 for Solaris? Phil Edwards
19:21 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Phil Edwards
19:16 Re: PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Phil Edwards
18:16 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Brian Jones
18:13 Re: Altivec strangeness? Aldy Hernandez
18:10 Re: AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers Aldy Hernandez
18:03 Re: AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers [UPDATE] Aldy Hernandez
16:41 Re: Test distilled from -gdwarf-2 -O3 bootstrap failure Alexandre Oliva
16:21 Re: Altivec strangeness? Daniel Egger
16:05 Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Bryce McKinlay
16:00 AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers Daniel Egger
16:00 AltiVec too pedantic about type qualifiers [UPDATE] Daniel Egger
15:25 Re: Altivec strangeness? Aldy Hernandez
14:39 I saw your website christineswayne
14:21 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Mark Mitchell
14:20 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Mark Mitchell
14:11 -builtin and C++ Lubos Lunak
13:44 Is make compare supposed to work on i386-unknown-freebsd4.5? Mack Lobell
13:39 Re: What is a successful build? Christian J鰊sson
13:28 What is a successful build? Stephen L Moshier
13:14 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Alexandre Oliva
12:41 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Joseph S. Myers
12:35 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Joseph S. Myers
12:09 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
11:42 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Jakub Jelinek
11:18 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Mark Mitchell
11:16 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Mark Mitchell
10:53 Installing libjava fails Andreas Schwab
10:52 ESTACA ACABANDO A PROMO敲O VOLTA AS AULAS APROVEITE!! DISTRIBUIDORA INFORMATICA
10:47 Successfully built GCC 3.0.4 on vax-unknown-netbsd1.5.2 Lars Brinkhoff
10:36 ESTACA ACABANDO A PROMO敲O VOLTA AS AULAS APROVEITE!! DISTRIBUIDORA INFORMATICA
10:03 Open Source PCI Bridge Soft Core tadejm
09:57 ESTACA ACABANDO A PROMO敲O VOLTA AS AULAS APROVEITE!! DISTRIBUIDORA INFORMATICA
09:41 ESTACA ACABANDO A PROMO敲O VOLTA AS AULAS APROVEITE!! DISTRIBUIDORA INFORMATICA
09:10 3.0 features.html; 3.0.4 also has threadsafe libstdc++ Jeff Donner
06:21 Successful build of GCC Beau Kuiper
04:20 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Fergus Henderson
04:14 Re: Sparc V9 support yet? Alexandre Oliva
04:08 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Alexandre Oliva
03:59 Re: 3.1 doesn't bootstrap on sparcv9 Alexandre Oliva
02:37 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
02:26 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Jakub Jelinek
02:15 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Fergus Henderson

February 23, 2002
23:15 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Christophe de Dinechin
23:10 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
22:57 g++ conformance question Gregory Haley
21:56 Re: 3.1 doesn't bootstrap on sparcv9 David O'Brien
20:57 Re: Performance with Intel Foster chip Tim Prince
20:57 Re: Performance with IA64 Tim Prince
18:30 --- Have You Heard of Age Reversal with HGH? --- 2412864433222 wellnes241286
17:52 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
17:38 Re: PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Joseph S. Myers
17:19 gcc-ss-20020223 is now available gccadmin
17:02 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
16:50 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Mark Mitchell
16:37 Re: Altivec strangeness? Daniel Egger
16:20 Re: Altivec conditional? Daniel Egger
16:20 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Daniel Egger
15:20 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
14:58 Re: Throwing exception in constructor causes segfault Andreas Schwab
14:53 Re: PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Mark Mitchell
14:52 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Mark Mitchell
14:41 Re: PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Joseph S. Myers
14:23 Re: PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Mark Mitchell
13:57 Re: Throwing exception in constructor causes segfault Craig Rodrigues
13:20 i586-pc-linux-gnu Tamas Nagy
12:56 Re: Throwing exception in constructor causes segfault Andreas Schwab
11:59 Throwing exception in constructor causes segfault Craig Rodrigues
11:16 Successful build of gcc-3.0.4 on i686-pc-cygwin Darren Smith
11:10 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
09:25 Re: Concerning the test_summary script Christian J鰊sson
08:30 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
02:54 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Daniel Egger
00:38 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Jakub Jelinek
00:24 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva

February 22, 2002
21:49 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
21:23 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Alexandre Oliva
21:20 Re: 3.1 doesn't bootstrap on sparcv9 Alexandre Oliva
21:18 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
21:03 3.1 doesn't bootstrap on sparcv9 Brad Lucier
21:01 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Brad Lucier
21:01 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
20:47 Re: Why -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 for Solaris? Alexandre Oliva
20:46 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Alexandre Oliva
20:43 Re: Why -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 for Solaris? David Edelsohn
20:37 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Brad Lucier
20:31 Why -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 for Solaris? Craig Rodrigues
20:21 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Alexandre Oliva
20:05 Broken link to "GCC Benchmarks ... Mini-FAQ" Will Galway
19:56 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 lucier
19:53 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure lucier
18:36 Gcc 3.0.4 Bobby McNulty Junior
17:26 Re: Altivec conditional? Geoff Keating
16:35 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Janis Johnson
16:32 Re: 3.0.4 successes Janis Johnson
16:29 Re: Successfule build: gcc-3.0.4, C and C++ Janis Johnson
16:28 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
16:17 Re: 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Alexandre Oliva
16:16 Re: HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED problems Alexandre Oliva
16:02 Re: HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED problems Michael Hayes
16:00 Re: Fw: bug in makefile for mips target build of gcc ??? Eric Christopher
15:53 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Craig Rodrigues
15:47 Re: altivec amusement Aldy Hernandez
15:45 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
15:42 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
15:30 3.0.4 builds for solaris 2.7 and 2.8 George.R.Goffe
15:16 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Alexandre Oliva
14:56 3.0.4 successes Blair Zajac
14:51 Re: Test plan for GCC 3.1? Joe Buck
14:38 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Aldy Hernandez
14:36 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Aldy Hernandez
14:35 Re: Altivec strangeness? Aldy Hernandez
14:28 Re: Altivec conditional? Aldy Hernandez
14:27 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Jakub Jelinek
14:27 Successfule build: gcc-3.0.4, C and C++ Stephano Mariani
14:24 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Alexandre Oliva
14:14 Test plan for GCC 3.1? Craig Rodrigues
13:55 gcc-3.0.4 ICE for m68k-elf target Peter Barada
13:51 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Jakub Jelinek
13:46 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Alexandre Oliva
13:28 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Jakub Jelinek
13:16 Re: GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Alexandre Oliva
13:00 Sparc V9 support yet? ama
12:15 RE: 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc-cygwin. Jan Reimers
11:42 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Toon Moene
11:27 Re: Successful Build: gcc 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
11:26 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.4 on i686-pc-cygwin Janis Johnson
11:25 Re: GCC built on AIX 5.1 Janis Johnson
11:25 Re: Build success (Debian Woody/Testing, i686, gcc 3.0.4) Janis Johnson
11:02 Re: Performance with IA64 Steve Christiansen
11:02 successful gcc-3.0.4 build for m68k-elf Peter Barada
10:59 RE: 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc-cygwin. Stephano Mariani
10:34 Re: 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc-cygwin. Mack Lobell
09:59 RE: Build success (Debian Woody/Testing, i686, gcc 3.0.4) Tamas Nagy
09:55 Successful build of gcc-3.0.4 on i686-pc-cygwin Mack Lobell
09:53 RE: 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc-cygwin. Stephano Mariani
09:52 Re: 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc-cygwin. David Edelsohn
09:52 Re: rfc: DW_AT_vector Richard Henderson
09:42 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc-cygwin. Mack Lobell
09:42 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Stan Shebs
09:32 Re: Performance with Intel Foster chip Davide Libenzi
09:21 Re: Performance with Intel Foster chip Mark Hahn
09:16 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Daniel Egger
09:13 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Daniel Egger
09:09 Re: More altivec array initialisation troubles Graham Stott
08:59 More altivec array initialisation troubles Daniel Egger
08:25 Re: powerpc-linux-gnu bootstrap fail Daniel Egger
08:25 Altivec strangeness? Daniel Egger
08:18 GCC built on AIX 5.1 Dan Million
07:43 Bad mirrors J Scott Berg
07:09 change info for "current release" on web page Michael Tiemann
06:49 GCC3.0.4 : Solaris 2.6 build failure Mathieu Imrazene
06:26 Re: rfc: DW_AT_vector Andrew Cagney
06:25 Re: Altivec conditional? Daniel Egger
05:07 Re: Altivec conditional? Jakub Jelinek
05:03 HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED problems Unruh, Erwin
05:01 Fw: bug in makefile for mips target build of gcc ??? H Girard
04:57 Re: Altivec conditional? Daniel Egger
04:52 Re: Altivec conditional? Daniel Egger
04:33 Re: Performance with Intel Foster chip Jan Hubicka
04:26 3.0.3 or 3.0.4 ? Domenico Rotiroti
02:57 Verba Volant subscribe_verba
02:57 Re: 252.eon / current GCC Andreas Jaeger
02:32 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released. Toon Moene
02:06 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Jakub Jelinek
01:53 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Joseph S. Myers
01:51 Re: Performance with Intel Foster chip Paolo Carlini
01:50 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joseph S. Myers
01:45 Re: PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Joseph S. Myers
01:33 Re: altivec amusement Richard Henderson
01:32 Re: Performance with Intel Foster chip Thomas Hiller
01:31 Re: SImode -> DImode optimizations Richard Henderson
01:29 Re: Performance with Intel Foster chip Paolo Carlini
01:28 Re: rfc: DW_AT_vector Richard Henderson
01:20 Performance with IA64 Thomas Hiller
01:17 Performance with Intel Foster chip Thomas Hiller

February 21, 2002
23:23 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Bryce McKinlay
23:05 Successful Build: gcc 3.0.4 Tajiman2
21:49 Re: rfc: DW_AT_vector Aldy Hernandez
21:28 Re: sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 7pm Christopher Faylor
21:28 Re: rfc: DW_AT_vector Elena Zannoni
21:24 altivec amusement Brad Lucier
21:17 Re: sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 7pm Zack Weinberg
21:02 SImode -> DImode optimizations Alan Modra
20:41 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch David Edelsohn
20:39 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch H . J . Lu
20:33 Re: rfc: DW_AT_vector Andrew Cagney
20:30 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
20:27 suggestion regarding release (or patch) announcements Mark Mielke
20:10 rfc: DW_AT_vector Aldy Hernandez
20:06 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
20:04 Re: sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 7pm Alexandre Oliva
20:02 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
19:59 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Tom Tromey
19:39 Re: Commercial Development Daniel Berlin
19:34 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
19:33 sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 7pm David O'Brien
19:29 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
19:28 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Alexandre Oliva
19:20 Re: Help! DW function pointer encoding for PA David Edelsohn
19:19 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
19:05 Re: 252.eon / current GCC Michael Matz
19:03 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Alexandre Oliva
18:59 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch David Edelsohn
18:47 Re: Commercial Development Richard Kenner
18:33 Re: Commercial Development Alexandre Oliva
18:29 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Mark Mitchell
18:12 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Richard Kenner
18:07 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joe Buck
18:02 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joe Buck
17:56 PATCH: Correct diff-generation in release scripts Mark Mitchell
17:50 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joseph S. Myers
17:42 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joe Buck
17:38 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joseph S. Myers
17:32 GCC 3.0 branch Mark Mitchell
17:26 GNAT merge status Joseph S. Myers
17:25 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Mark Mitchell
17:24 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch Joseph S. Myers
17:21 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Mark Mitchell
17:13 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joseph S. Myers
16:58 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released the_sage2000
16:50 Re: Build success (Debian Woody/Testing, i686, gcc 3.0.4) Janis Johnson
16:48 Re: Cross build on cygwin fails. DJ Delorie
16:48 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Released Joe Buck
16:45 GCC 3.1 Branch Mark Mitchell
16:26 GCC 3.0.4 Released Mark Mitchell
16:17 Troubles with CONST_DOUBLE Peter Barada
16:12 Re: maybe GCC C++ bug in namespace handling? Alexandre Oliva
15:47 Re: Altivec conditional? Aldy Hernandez
15:45 Re: Altivec conditional? Aldy Hernandez
15:33 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
15:31 Re: maybe GCC C++ bug in namespace handling? Alexandre Oliva
15:29 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Alexandre Oliva
15:04 Re: build broken Alexandre Oliva
15:02 Help with __eh_pc on Unixware 7 Rakesh Sachdeva
14:51 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
14:42 build broken mike stump
14:37 Cross build on cygwin fails. Mack Lobell
14:21 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Jakub Jelinek
14:18 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
14:08 md5sums wrong in 3.0.4? Richard B. Kreckel
13:38 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
13:32 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
13:31 web link broken David Byron
13:16 Re: Help! DW function pointer encoding for PA John David Anglin
12:50 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Fergus Henderson
12:46 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
12:46 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Jakub Jelinek
12:45 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
12:35 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
12:34 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
12:31 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
12:27 What's fixed in 3.0.4 (list of PRs) Joe Buck
11:33 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
10:36 Re: Help! DW function pointer encoding for PA John David Anglin
10:07 Build success (Debian Woody/Testing, i686, gcc 3.0.4) Tamas Nagy
09:56 Re: powerpc-linux-gnu bootstrap fail Franz Sirl
08:37 Re: Altivec conditional? Daniel Jacobowitz
08:28 Re: powerpc-linux-gnu bootstrap fail David Edelsohn
08:14 Re: PR optimization/4490 (-m128bit-long-double on ia32) Jan Hubicka
06:26 PR optimization/4490 (-m128bit-long-double on ia32) Jakub Jelinek
05:08 powerpc-linux-gnu bootstrap fail Franz Sirl
04:59 gcc 3.0.4 redhat 7.2 success Eric Malouin
04:20 New Sparc bootstrap failure Richard Kenner
03:17 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Martin von Loewis
02:35 Re: Altivec conditional? Daniel Egger
00:52 Re: escaped newline handling Zack Weinberg
00:20 Re: Help! DW function pointer encoding for PA Richard Henderson
00:18 PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/: Web page comment Gerald Pfeifer
00:07 escaped newline handling Jan Beulich
00:06 Which registers have to be saved on i386 Einar Karttunen
00:02 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
00:01 Where to find the oldest version of gcc? yinliyin

February 20, 2002
23:50 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/: Web page comment Joachim Nilsson
23:48 Re: Altivec conditional? Aldy Hernandez
23:34 Help! DW function pointer encoding for PA John David Anglin
23:17 Re: More g++ EH failures for i586 H . J . Lu
23:05 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Jakub Jelinek
22:59 RE: More g++ EH failures for i586 Danny Smith
20:43 Re: QFmode float support missing from optabs? Michael Hayes
19:51 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
19:42 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
19:29 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Alexandre Oliva
19:05 精典营销软件推荐 sesoft
17:47 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads David Edelsohn
16:59 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Loren James Rittle
15:57 More g++ EH failures for i586 H . J . Lu
15:56 Re: gcc3.0.2 built on OSF4.0e Janis Johnson
15:47 Re: Successful Build for GCC 3.0.3 Janis Johnson
15:38 Re: QFmode float support missing from optabs? Alan Lehotsky
15:31 Re: gcc3.0.2 built on OSF4.0e Joe Buck
15:19 Re: QFmode float support missing from optabs? Richard Henderson
14:54 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Jim Dehnert
14:38 Re: QFmode float support missing from optabs? Alan Lehotsky
14:19 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads David Edelsohn
14:15 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Michael Matz
14:13 Re: How crazy a machine can GCC usefully target? Richard Henderson
14:10 Re: QFmode float support missing from optabs? Richard Henderson
14:05 Re: combiner? reload? ... Richard Henderson
14:00 Re: sin/cos via SSE2, and an alignment bug (was Re: sqrt via SSE2) Richard Henderson
13:55 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Michael Matz
13:43 Re: GNU C++ compiler... mike stump
13:39 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Phil Edwards
13:22 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads David Edelsohn
13:16 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads David Edelsohn
13:09 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Phil Edwards
12:49 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads David Edelsohn
11:25 PATCH for Re: Link update notification. Gerald Pfeifer
11:21 gcc3.0.2 built on OSF4.0e Steven P. Dirkse
11:21 Link update notification. Gr間oire VATRY
10:20 Successful Build for GCC 3.0.3 Jeff Stuart
10:15 Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Mark Mitchell
09:57 Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Joe Buck
09:50 Re: GNU C++ compiler... Gabriel Dos Reis
09:34 Re: Commercial Development Joe Buck
09:29 Re: GNU C++ compiler... Zack Weinberg
09:08 How crazy a machine can GCC usefully target? Alan Lehotsky
08:54 QFmode float support missing from optabs? Alan Lehotsky
08:20 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads David Edelsohn
08:07 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Michael Veksler
07:46 GNU C++ compiler... Alex Marais
07:32 Re: CVS and gcc trees Phil Edwards
07:30 GNU C++ compiler... Alex Marais
06:50 Re: CVS and gcc trees Franz Sirl
06:45 Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Mark Mitchell
05:55 Re: GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Craig Rodrigues
05:42 Re: GCC Installation Problem Tim Prince
05:39 combiner? reload? ... Dmitry
03:12 Altivec conditional? Daniel Egger
02:32 Inquiry unni
01:50 Re: sin/cos via SSE2, and an alignment bug (was Re: sqrt via SSE2) Jan Hubicka
00:52 In GCC 3.0.3, Is M.Core CPU completely supported? guobing
00:50 GCC-3.0.4 (pre) on AIX requires pthreads Michael Veksler
00:48 GCC Installation Problem ADVISE OP Projekt Team
00:48 Re: Your change in boehm-gc/Makefile.am Bryce McKinlay
00:40 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Mark Mitchell

February 19, 2002
23:18 Re: Wshadow Problem Neil Booth
23:05 Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0 Magnus Fromreide
22:02 Wshadow Problem Soubhik
20:01 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Craig Rodrigues
19:45 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Denis Perchine
19:07 Re: Commercial Development Tim Hollebeek
18:25 Re: Commercial Development Robert Dewar
16:57 Re: Commercial Development Daniel Berlin
16:51 Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Joe Buck
15:05 Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Carlo Wood
14:56 Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0 Neil Booth
14:46 Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0 Ian Britten
14:42 Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules? Stan Shebs
14:25 pr5649 on powerpc (broken splitters) Michael Matz
14:16 Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0 Neil Booth
14:08 Re: New to GCC Hacking Neil Booth
13:54 Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0 Nathan Sidwell
13:52 Re: sin/cos via SSE2, and an alignment bug (was Re: sqrt via SSE2) Richard Henderson
13:26 Re: CVS and gcc trees Phil Edwards
13:22 Re: Commercial Development Toon Moene
13:16 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS David Edelsohn
13:12 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Peter Barada
13:08 Re: Commercial Development Robert Dewar
12:54 Re: Commercial Development Joe Buck
12:37 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS David Edelsohn
12:23 Re: 3.1 on Darwin? Stan Shebs
12:07 New to GCC Hacking Spencer Ogden
12:03 Re: Commercial Development Gustavo Niemeyer
11:58 Convert Diab assembler source to Gnu format? Steve Snyder
11:56 Re: Commercial Development Daniel Berlin
11:55 Re: Commercial Development Daniel Berlin
11:53 Re: Commercial Development Richard Kenner
11:49 Re: GCC snapshot problem Jeff Sturm
11:49 Re: Commercial Development Per Bothner
11:49 Re: Commercial Development Joe Buck
11:47 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Peter Barada
11:29 Re: 3.1 on Darwin? Brad Lucier
11:25 Re: Commercial Development Daniel Berlin
11:18 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Zack Weinberg
11:16 Re: 3.1 on Darwin? Stan Shebs
11:13 -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0 Ian Britten
11:13 Re: Commercial Development Joe Buck
11:12 Re: Commercial Development Daniel Berlin
11:08 Re: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14. Craig Rodrigues
10:32 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Richard Henderson
10:31 Re: GCC snapshot problem George.R.Goffe
10:17 Re: Commercial Development Joe Buck
09:26 Re: Commercial Development Joe Buck
09:19 3.1 on Darwin? lucier
09:16 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:16 GCC 3.0.4 Mark Mitchell
09:08 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Jan Hubicka
08:59 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Prerelease Bob Wilson
08:53 Re: Successfull build on OpenBSD 3.0-stable Janis Johnson
08:47 libstdc++ related bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
08:12 Re: templates undefined refrence problem Arun Saini , Gurgaon
07:36 Re: GCC help Philipp Thomas
06:46 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Peter Barada
06:33 Re: sin/cos via SSE2, and an alignment bug (was Re: sqrt via SSE2) Jan Hubicka
06:19 Re: Problem on Solaris8 gcc-3.0.3 jean-frederic clere
05:55 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Tim Prince
05:43 Re: Commercial Development Robert Dewar
05:32 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Tim Prince
05:31 GCC help aditya nishandar
05:04 sin/cos via SSE2, and an alignment bug (was Re: sqrt via SSE2) Tom Womack
04:43 Your change in boehm-gc/Makefile.am Andreas Schwab
04:33 Re: Commercial Development Florian Weimer
03:18 Commercial Development Markus Wenke
03:17 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Jan Hubicka
02:57 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Tom Womack
02:47 Successfull build on OpenBSD 3.0-stable Dmitry N Tsvetkov
01:07 =?GB2312?B?TGludXi5pLPMyqbF4NG1o6zD4rfRyrPL3g==?= =?GB2312?B?TGludXijoQ==?=

February 18, 2002
20:40 gcc-ss-20020218 is now available gccadmin
16:51 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Richard Henderson
16:46 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS DJ Delorie
16:42 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Richard Henderson
16:40 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Richard Henderson
16:22 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Peter Barada
16:16 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS DJ Delorie
15:45 Re: Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Richard Henderson
12:13 Problem with using <ctype.h> with gcc 3.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5 Arun Saini , Gurgaon
12:10 Re: GNU linker Arun Saini , Gurgaon
11:11 Re: templates undefined refrence problem Jeff Dever
11:03 Re: templates undefined refrence problem mike stump
11:03 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Mark Mitchell
10:57 m68k/dpx2.h ASM_OUTPUT_SOURCE_FILENAME weirdness Zack Weinberg
10:26 Re: Problem on Solaris8 gcc-3.0.3 Jeff Sturm
10:09 Re: CVS and gcc trees Peter Barada
10:06 Re: Error on GtkAda Richard Kenner
09:56 Concerning the test_summary script Christian J鰊sson
09:30 Problem on Solaris8 gcc-3.0.3 jean-frederic clere
09:07 Re: Error on GtkAda Florian Weimer
09:06 Re: Error on GtkAda Florian Weimer
08:27 Question about GO_IF_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS Peter Barada
06:59 Re: assembler debug_line support (was Re: [v3] -pedantic-errors vs. extern template) Gabriel Dos Reis
06:49 Re: assembler debug_line support (was Re: [v3] -pedantic-errors vs. extern template) Jason Merrill
06:40 [GCC-3.0.3] Compilation issues on NetBSD(i386) Dias Da Silva Loic
06:28 templates undefined refrence problem Jeff Dever
06:18 Re: assembler debug_line support (was Re: [v3] -pedantic-errors vs. extern template) Gabriel Dos Reis
05:33 RE: 8051 C Compiler Stephano Mariani
04:59 assembler debug_line support (was Re: [v3] -pedantic-errors vs.extern template) Jason Merrill
04:57 Re: 8051 C Compiler Kirill Ratkin
04:31 8051 C Compiler Richard Brown
02:59 GNU linker B錼d Lutzow-Holm Myrstad
02:54 Re: loop unrolling performance regression Paolo Carlini
02:45 loop unrolling performance regression Jan Hubicka
02:06 RE: Strange behaviour of "cin" Arun Saini , Gurgaon
00:18 Re: math broken on mips H . J . Lu
00:13 Re: copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division Lars Brinkhoff

February 17, 2002
23:59 math broken on mips Zhang Fuxin
21:01 Re: Ask for help! GNU General Contact Address
20:44 -Woverloaded-virtual Krishnakumar B
20:30 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
17:59 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Jeff Sturm
15:10 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
15:01 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage David Edelsohn
12:07 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Andreas Jaeger
12:01 Re: Loading libstdc++.so.4.0.0 produces error Richard Henderson
11:58 Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always? Richard Henderson
11:52 RFC: fix char* restrict Dan Nicolaescu
11:29 Re: fabs() intrinsic totally broken in P4, as of 2002-02-11 Richard Henderson
11:29 Re: fabs() intrinsic totally broken in P4, as of 2002-02-11 Richard Henderson
11:12 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
10:26 Re: copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division Jan Hubicka
10:17 Re: Loading libstdc++.so.4.0.0 produces error Craig Rodrigues
10:13 Loading libstdc++.so.4.0.0 produces error Lars Andersen
10:00 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Florian Weimer
09:05 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Jan Hubicka
09:02 Re: fabs() intrinsic totally broken in P4, as of 2002-02-11 Jan Hubicka
08:35 Re: fabs() intrinsic totally broken in P4, as of 2002-02-11 Jan Hubicka
08:15 Re: copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division Jan Hubicka
08:12 Re: fabs() intrinsic totally broken in P4, as of 2002-02-11 Jan Hubicka
08:11 Re: sqrt via SSE2 registers Jan Hubicka
08:09 Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always? Carlo Wood
07:49 Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage Jeff Sturm
07:05 RE: Strange behaviour of "cin" Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
06:56 Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always? Neil Booth
06:22 Re: paths for headers and libraries Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
06:15 Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always? Carlo Wood
00:56 libstdc++ libtool lossage Richard Henderson
00:09 Re: PPC constant merging problem Bryce McKinlay

February 16, 2002
21:53 Binutils 2.11.93.0.2 is released H . J . Lu
21:22 PPC constant merging problem Bryce McKinlay
20:05 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Chris Lattner
16:17 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? Richard Henderson
15:27 RE: Strange behaviour of "cin" Arun Saini , Gurgaon
13:45 Re: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14. Craig Rodrigues
13:37 Re: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14. Jakub Jelinek
13:29 Re: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14. Craig Rodrigues
12:44 Re: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14. Daniel Jacobowitz
12:02 Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM value: 14. Craig Rodrigues
07:34 sqrt via SSE2 registers Tom Womack
07:34 fabs() intrinsic totally broken in P4, as of 2002-02-11 Tom Womack
06:54 =?GB2312?B?SkFWQbPM0PLUsdC9y64yMDAyxOrT1tXHwcs=?= =?GB2312?B?SkFWQcXg0bXW0NDE?=
04:59 Re: copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division Lars Brinkhoff
04:02 Re: copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division Lars Brinkhoff

February 15, 2002
23:42 Warnings while bootstrapping gcc-3.1 and binutils cvs sources using gcc-3.0.3 on sparc-linux Christian J鰊sson
23:22 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? H . J . Lu
20:45 Re: support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Stephen L Moshier
18:24 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Zack Weinberg
18:16 Re: paths for headers and libraries Ross Smith
17:56 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Joe Buck
17:27 patch to support libunwind-based exception handling David Mosberger
16:50 Re: Urgent Reply Tim Prince
16:14 RE: paths for headers and libraries David Byron
15:58 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Chris Lattner
15:50 GCC 3.0.4 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
14:49 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Phil Edwards
14:43 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Phil Edwards
14:37 Re: paths for headers and libraries Craig Rodrigues
14:34 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Daniel Jacobowitz
14:23 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joe Buck
14:17 paths for headers and libraries David Byron
14:00 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joseph S D Yao
13:53 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joseph S D Yao
12:24 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Florian Weimer
12:11 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Phil Edwards
11:31 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Florian Weimer
10:49 Re: Keeping a local CVS repository updated with public CVS changes... law
10:43 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Joe Buck
10:30 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Phil Edwards
10:29 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Jeff Sturm
10:10 Re: copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division Jan Hubicka
10:06 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Jeff Sturm
10:04 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Janis Johnson
10:03 Re: Strange behaviour of "cin" Phil Edwards
09:54 Re: Strange behaviour of "cin" Joe Buck
09:51 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joe Buck
09:43 Re: Urgent Reply Joe Buck
09:38 Re: Urgent Reply Phil Edwards
09:25 Re: Strange behaviour of "cin" Arun Saini , Gurgaon
09:13 Re: Strange behaviour of "cin" Benjamin Kosnik
09:11 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joseph S D Yao
09:07 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joseph S D Yao
08:59 Strange behaviour of "cin" Arun Saini , Gurgaon
08:50 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Jeff Sturm
08:45 RE: Urgent Reply Robert Dewar
08:39 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Jeff Sturm
08:28 Re: Urgent Reply Kevin Handy
08:22 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joseph S D Yao
08:15 RE: Urgent Reply Jukka Holappa
08:00 RE: Urgent Reply Stephano Mariani
07:54 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joseph S D Yao
07:53 Urgent Reply Olamuyiwa Ige
06:58 =?GB2312?B?yrXP1sT6ILDZIM3yuLsgzsy1xMPOIM/r?= yleef
06:37 Bug in find_reloads_address D. Towner
06:36 copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division Lars Brinkhoff
06:18 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Martin Kahlert
06:07 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Jeff Sturm
01:39 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? Jakub Jelinek

February 14, 2002
23:18 Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Martin Kahlert
21:49 Re: [Q:] Implementation of global register variables Fergus Henderson
19:33 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Geert Bosch
18:19 [Q:] Implementation of global register variables Fermin Reig
17:25 Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen Joe Buck
16:29 PROMO敲O IMPERD蚔EL ! ! ! Distribuidora de equipamentos
16:17 Re: bootstrap failure in sparc boehm mike stump
16:02 Keeping a local CVS repository updated with public CVS changes... apl
15:55 Re: -g1 is broken H . J . Lu
15:40 Re: Code Exchange Link Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
15:28 Re: bootstrap failure in sparc boehm Jeff Sturm
15:25 Experiment: gcc and doxygen Phil Edwards
15:03 Re: -g1 is broken Richard Henderson
15:01 Re: GCC_3.0 error Richard Henderson
14:51 Re: Conditional call instruction Richard Henderson
14:39 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? Jakub Jelinek
14:28 RE: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Shureih, Tariq
14:13 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? H . J . Lu
14:03 Re: Error on GtkAda Geert Bosch
13:35 bootstrap failure in sparc boehm mike stump
12:58 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? H . J . Lu
12:32 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? Jakub Jelinek
12:23 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? H . J . Lu
11:51 GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1 Joseph S D Yao
11:06 Code Exchange Link Michelle Stanton
09:29 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 law
09:18 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Mark Mitchell
08:07 SH documentation (Was: Re: SH: Reloc overflow) Joern Rennecke
06:44 Re: Dealing with duplicate bug reports Gerald Pfeifer
06:31 Verba Volant request
04:42 Dealing with duplicate bug reports Florian Weimer
00:25 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? H . J . Lu

February 13, 2002
23:58 Re: Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? Jakub Jelinek
21:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Alexandre Oliva
18:16 Re: Conditional call instruction Richard Kenner
17:41 Forthcoming launch AssociaMed and MedsPDA, prize draw and Link to us virtualdocnet
17:32 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Joe Buck
16:51 -g1 is broken H . J . Lu
16:44 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Steve Christiansen
16:43 Does your .eh_frame_hdr change work with DW_EH_PE_absptr? H . J . Lu
16:10 RE: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Shureih, Tariq
15:48 Re: Conditional call instruction Segher Boessenkool
15:02 Re: Conditional call instruction Geoff Keating
15:00 Re: Conditional call instruction Dale Johannesen
14:58 GCC_3.0 error devans
14:56 Re: Conditional call instruction David Edelsohn
14:55 We would like to get some information on your company josh.winters
14:48 Re: Conditional call instruction Geoff Keating
14:13 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Geoff Keating
13:58 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 David Edelsohn
13:00 Re: Conditional call instruction Mark Mitchell
12:48 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Florian Weimer
12:37 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Joe Buck
12:36 Re: Conditional call instruction Jim Wilson
12:29 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Toon Moene
12:11 Re: Debian/unstable on x86: Debugging GCC 3.1 Daniel Jacobowitz
12:08 Re: Conditional call instruction Paul Koning
11:28 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 David Edelsohn
11:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 David Edelsohn
11:18 Re: support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Jason Riedy
11:15 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Franz Sirl
11:14 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Franz Sirl
11:09 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Joe Buck
11:03 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 David Edelsohn
10:59 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Joe Buck
10:49 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Janis Johnson
10:43 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 David Edelsohn
10:38 Re: Conditional call instruction David Edelsohn
10:29 Re: Conditional call instruction Dale Johannesen
10:28 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Segher Boessenkool
10:22 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Dale Johannesen
10:13 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Janis Johnson
10:06 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Rainer Orth
09:53 Re: GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Joe Buck
09:13 How really pure should a pure function be? Bonzini
08:52 Re: Conditional call instruction Richard Earnshaw
08:47 GCC 3.0.4, GCC 3.1, GCC 3.2 Mark Mitchell
08:44 Re: optimization problem (with -O9) Joe Buck
08:43 Re: Conditional call instruction Mark Mitchell
08:38 Re: Conditional call instruction Richard Earnshaw
08:20 Re: Conditional call instruction Phil Blundell
08:07 optimization problem (with -O9) aditya
08:06 Conditional call instruction Mark Mitchell
07:59 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p D. Towner
06:05 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Bo Thorsen
05:41 Re: support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Jakub Jelinek
05:36 Re: support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Bo Thorsen
05:08 Re: support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Stephen L Moshier
03:27 Re: Small gcc-cvs ml problem Joseph S. Myers
01:37 Small gcc-cvs ml problem Bo Thorsen
01:00 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Gerald Pfeifer
00:12 Re: [Web] Invalid HTML Gerald Pfeifer
00:08 Re: Debian/unstable on x86: Debugging GCC 3.1 Florian Weimer

February 12, 2002
23:59 Re: Error on GtkAda Florian Weimer
23:07 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Jim Wilson
19:42 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Joel Sherrill
17:38 Fortran install problem Brad Lucier
17:24 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Richard Henderson
17:13 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Janis Johnson
16:49 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Richard Henderson
16:29 Re: Frame pointer using more than one register Richard Henderson
12:56 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Jim Wilson
12:30 Error on GtkAda Adrian Knoth
12:29 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p Geoff Keating
12:26 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p Geoff Keating
12:22 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Geoff Keating
12:10 Re: Debian/unstable on x86: Debugging GCC 3.1 Daniel Jacobowitz
12:01 Re: question about tree format Mark Mitchell
11:51 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Rainer Orth
11:44 Re: CVS problem Christopher Faylor
11:28 RE: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Shureih, Tariq
11:18 Re: Objective-C++ Mark Mitchell
11:18 Re: Objective-C++ Mark Mitchell
10:59 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Janis Johnson
10:55 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p Peter Barada
10:45 Re: need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Dale Johannesen
10:32 [Web] Invalid HTML Vincent Lefevre
10:29 need help with 176.gcc from SPEC CPU2000 on LP64 with GCC 3 Janis Johnson
10:18 Re: Problem: make bootstrap with libjava Tom Tromey
09:33 Debian/unstable on x86: Debugging GCC 3.1 Florian Weimer
09:14 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p Dan Towner
09:12 Re: Problem: make bootstrap with libjava Joe Buck
09:10 Re: Problem: make bootstrap with libjava Tom Tromey
08:57 Re: Debugging of gcc 3.1 programs with -mfpmath=sse Jan Hubicka
08:54 Re: Debugging of gcc 3.1 programs with -mfpmath=sse Eli Zaretskii
08:36 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Tom Womack
08:17 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p Nick Ing-Simmons
08:08 Re: Problem: make bootstrap with libjava David Edelsohn
07:51 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p Dan Towner
07:07 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Jakub Jelinek
07:05 cross-compiler for PowerPC from i386 Linux John D. Bruner
07:03 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Rainer Orth
06:38 Debugging of gcc 3.1 programs with -mfpmath=sse Jan Hubicka
06:36 Re: extern declaration Falk Hueffner
06:24 extern declaration thomas joseph
06:17 CVS is working again Bo Thorsen
06:15 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Bo Thorsen
06:12 Problem: make bootstrap with libjava Richard Walter
06:04 Re: support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Jakub Jelinek
05:45 Re: C99 Status Joseph S. Myers
05:22 Re: CVS problem Paolo Carlini
05:19 CVS server problems Richard Kenner
04:24 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Joel Sherrill
03:52 Frame pointer using more than one register Marek Michalkiewicz
02:11 Re: C99 Status Ingo Krabbe
01:49 CVS problem Bo Thorsen
01:27 RE: i wanna subscribe Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
00:24 Re: support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Andreas Jaeger
00:14 support of 128 bit long real on linux for ia32 Winfrid Tschiedel

February 11, 2002
23:02 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Alexandre Oliva
19:35 gcc-ss-20020211 is now available gccadmin
19:06 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Geoff Keating
18:43 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Jim Wilson
17:16 Re: report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:30 RE: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Shureih, Tariq
15:39 question about tree format Dennis Dams
15:29 report attached was Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Joel Sherrill
15:25 Re: maybe GCC C++ bug in namespace handling? Carlo Wood
14:53 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Rainer Orth
14:48 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Geoff Keating
13:50 Re: maybe GCC C++ bug in namespace handling? Jack Lloyd
13:33 successful build of 3.0.3 on i386-sequent-sysv4 Janis Johnson
13:28 Re: How to utilize PowerPC pre-existing flash resident code ??? David Edelsohn
13:24 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Brad Lucier
13:22 Re: SYMBOL_REF_FLAG Philip Blundell
13:16 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Jeff Sturm
12:49 Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Joel Sherrill
12:48 maybe GCC C++ bug in namespace handling? Dirk Mueller
12:45 Re: embedded target status on main CVS trunk Gerald Pfeifer
12:35 How to utilize PowerPC pre-existing flash resident code ??? Jon Miller
12:25 embedded target status on main CVS trunk Joel Sherrill
12:08 java/contribute.html (was: Status of Bugzilla?) Gerald Pfeifer
11:33 libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Brad Lucier
11:28 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Phil Edwards
11:21 [sparc64] is MASK_FASTER_STRUCTS broken? David O'Brien
11:18 [sparc64] is MASK_EPILOGUE required (lack of broken?) David O'Brien
10:32 Re: make compare failed Janis Johnson
10:32 Re: SYMBOL_REF_FLAG Geoff Keating
10:30 Re: Query with legitimate_constant_p Geoff Keating
10:27 Re: Sucessful build of gcc-3.0.3 on Tru64 5.1 Janis Johnson
10:19 C99 Status Me
10:07 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
09:25 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
08:50 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
07:44 SYMBOL_REF_FLAG Phil Blundell
07:30 Re: a warning to implement Paolo Carlini
07:19 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
07:13 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
06:53 RE: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
06:44 RE: a warning to implement Bernard Dautrevaux
06:05 Re: i wanna subscribe Alexandre Oliva
05:40 i wanna subscribe Aditya Pratapsinh Nishandar
00:14 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Tristan Gingold
00:03 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Tristan Gingold

February 10, 2002
20:42 Re: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Adam Megacz
17:44 Re: default access for class/struct bug? Michael Matz
16:39 Re: default access for class/struct bug? Paolo Carlini
16:08 黄页号码库给您拜年，祝您马年马到成功！ 黃頁號碼庫
15:19 Re: Finding GCC-binaries for Windows XP Tim Prince
14:07 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
13:19 default access for class/struct bug? Michael Matz
13:06 Re: Finding GCC-binaries for Windows XP Christopher Faylor
13:02 Re: std::collate hash() still broken Paolo Carlini
12:56 Re: std::collate hash() still broken Benjamin Kosnik
12:31 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
12:26 make compare failed Mack Lobell
12:22 Re: empty loop elimination (lack of) ? Cyrille Chepelov
11:47 Query with legitimate_constant_p Daniel Towner
11:33 I saw your profile and thought you would match my needs! WatchMeNow6969
11:27 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
11:08 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Christopher Faylor
10:54 Hi my name is Heather HeatherShowsIt
10:21 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
09:59 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
09:53 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
09:38 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
09:23 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Florian Weimer
09:10 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage John Levon
09:07 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Claus Fischer
09:07 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
09:00 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Carlo Wood
08:56 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Carlo Wood
08:30 Re: Finding GCC-binaries for Windows XP Jeff Sturm
08:19 Re: Finding GCC-binaries for Windows XP Craig Rodrigues
08:10 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Andreas Schwab
08:09 Re: Finding GCC-binaries for Windows XP Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
07:50 Finding GCC-binaries for Windows XP Ragnvald Larsen
06:01 Re: a warning to implement Per Abrahamsen
05:00 Re: std::collate hash() still broken AWLaFramboise
04:19 Re: std::collate hash() still broken AWLaFramboise
04:06 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage AWLaFramboise
03:53 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
03:51 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Joseph S. Myers
03:39 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Claus Fischer
03:21 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Claus Fischer

February 09, 2002
20:59 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Phil Edwards
20:19 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Christopher Faylor
18:27 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Alexandre Oliva
18:24 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Alexandre Oliva
18:22 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Alexandre Oliva
18:08 Sucessful build of gcc-3.0.3 on Tru64 5.1 Roger Sayle
17:39 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR gdb/290 Joe Buck
12:18 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR gdb/290 Andreas Schwab
11:51 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR gdb/290 Andrew Cagney
11:37 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR gdb/290 Joe Buck
11:25 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Joe Buck
11:23 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joe Buck
11:19 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR gdb/290 Andrew Cagney
09:21 I SAW YOUR AD francesnow2002
06:14 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
06:08 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
05:55 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Gerald Pfeifer
02:19 Re: instalar Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
00:33 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Jim Wilson

February 08, 2002
21:23 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Kenneth Lareau
18:06 instalar JULIA COBOS BRAVO
17:58 VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL virus-reports
16:17 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Russ Allbery
15:29 RE: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Shureih, Tariq
15:13 Build or not a build that is the question. ackek
14:25 Problems building m68k-elf version of gcc-20020204 Peter Barada
14:14 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Jim Wilson
13:33 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Geoff Keating
11:48 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
10:51 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
10:03 Re: TOC problems David Edelsohn
09:58 Re: gcc 3.0 branch report for 34 embedded targets Joe Buck
09:46 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Craig Rodrigues
09:09 RE: a warning to implement Bernard Dautrevaux
08:34 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
08:23 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage AWLaFramboise
08:21 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
08:19 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
08:12 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Jacobowitz
08:07 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
08:01 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
07:46 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Theodore Papadopoulo
07:42 TOC problems Adam Courchesne
07:37 RE: Error in compilation of GCC 3.0.3 Dana, Eric
07:22 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Tristan Gingold
06:57 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Lars Brinkhoff
06:47 RE: a warning to implement Bernard Dautrevaux
06:39 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Tristan Gingold
06:36 Re: gcc 3.0 branch report for 34 embedded targets Joel Sherrill
06:29 apology for Bugzilla comments Joel Sherrill
06:21 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Tom Womack
05:46 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Carlo Wood
04:46 FYI: GNAT bootstrap on Sparc still broken Richard Kenner
04:24 Re: Your SPECfp2000 run - date/time stamp. Toon Moene
04:19 Re: Your SPECfp2000 run - date/time stamp. Andreas Jaeger
04:15 Re: Your SPECfp2000 run - date/time stamp. Andreas Jaeger
04:07 Testing optimisation options on P4 Tom Womack
02:45 Your SPECfp2000 run - date/time stamp. Toon Moene
02:01 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Lars Brinkhoff
01:57 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage AWLaFramboise
01:54 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
01:49 Re: Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage Lars Brinkhoff
01:46 all-target-libstdc++? Eric Christopher
01:39 Status of GCC memory checking, -fcheck-memory-usage AWLaFramboise

February 07, 2002
21:18 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Roger Sayle
21:02 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Ulrich Drepper
20:56 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Roger Sayle
20:22 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
20:20 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
20:13 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Bryce McKinlay
19:51 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Bryce McKinlay
19:36 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Bryce McKinlay
18:50 GCC porting problem Osman Bineev
18:47 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Phil Edwards
18:31 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Richard Kenner
18:18 Re: GCJ problem on RS/6000 Bryce McKinlay
17:42 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
17:36 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
17:28 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Phil Edwards
17:27 Re: Infrastructure for long branches? Richard Henderson
17:18 Re: 32-bit vtable problem on IA64 HP-UX Richard Henderson
17:04 Re: Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Steve Christiansen
16:58 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
16:55 Re: Error in compilation of GCC 3.0.3 Janis Johnson
16:50 Help with Gcc-3.0.3 cross-compile Shureih, Tariq
16:18 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joel Sherrill
16:03 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
15:59 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
15:46 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joel Sherrill
15:36 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Richard Kenner
15:35 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
15:25 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
15:21 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Kenneth Lareau
14:59 Re: Infrastructure for long branches? Dale Johannesen
14:41 Re: libffi test Bryce McKinlay
14:41 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Richard Kenner
14:37 Infrastructure for long branches? lucier
14:25 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
14:17 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Richard Henderson
13:56 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Richard Kenner
13:53 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Jakub Jelinek
13:52 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Neil Booth
13:51 Re: Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Florian Weimer
13:37 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Richard Henderson
13:34 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Toon Moene
13:32 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Richard Henderson
13:21 Re: Improve -msse documentation (Was: Sorting out the list of P4 issues) Richard Henderson
13:00 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
12:48 Attempting to build g++-2.95.3 for m68k-elf Peter Barada
12:19 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
12:09 Re: Need some help Alexandre Oliva
11:59 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips mike stump
11:54 Re: Cannot allocate 92625564 bytes after allocating 198356992 bytes mike stump
11:53 External QA call for the GCC project Laurent Guerby
11:52 gcc and backends? Mr. Bastard Fenux From Hell
11:47 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Laurent Guerby
11:31 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
11:23 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Joe Buck
11:06 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Benjamin Kosnik
11:05 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Tom Tromey
11:02 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Richard Kenner
10:54 Re: gcc 3.0 branch report for 34 embedded targets Benjamin Kosnik
10:52 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Neil Booth
10:51 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
10:40 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
10:14 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
10:03 An optimization problem, perhaps arm-elf related Tobias Ringstrom
10:01 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jeff Sturm
09:47 32-bit vtable problem on IA64 HP-UX Jessica Han
09:46 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
09:42 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Ulrich Drepper
09:31 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Richard Henderson
09:31 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
09:26 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
08:50 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips H . J . Lu
08:50 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
08:50 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
08:30 Exception unwinding bug Ed Maste
08:28 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
08:17 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
08:02 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jakub Jelinek
08:00 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
07:55 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Tom Tromey
07:51 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jeff Sturm
07:27 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Phil Blundell
07:19 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Michael Matz
06:25 gcc 3.0 branch report for 34 embedded targets joel.sherrill
06:24 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Dewar
05:46 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Tom Womack
05:22 Cannot allocate 92625564 bytes after allocating 198356992 bytes Dimitri Frederickx
03:59 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Laurent Guerby
03:48 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Jan Hubicka
03:47 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Jan Hubicka
03:43 Re: Need some help Alcino Dall Igna Junior
03:38 Re: Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Jan Hubicka
03:27 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Richard Kenner
03:25 Re: Objective-C++ Nicola Pero
03:23 Improve -msse documentation (Was: Sorting out the list of P4 issues) Jan Hubicka
03:13 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Geoff Keating
02:58 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Jakub Jelinek
02:41 Re: gcc-3.0.4 on arm jeroen dobbelaere
02:11 Re: xscale-elf-gcc Richard Earnshaw
01:30 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning toimplement) Alexandre Duret-Lutz
01:24 Error in compilation of GCC 3.0.3 Johan van den Berg
00:07 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning toimplement) Magnus Fromreide
00:03 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson

February 06, 2002
23:44 Re: Objective-C++ Gerald Pfeifer
23:44 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Eric Christopher
23:38 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips H . J . Lu
23:27 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Ulrich Drepper
23:20 Re: Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips Eric Christopher
23:01 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Joe Buck
22:57 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joe Buck
22:25 Gcc builtin functions used by glibc not available on mips H . J . Lu
21:54 Re: Objective-C++ Stan Shebs
21:34 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jeff Sturm
21:04 OT: good I18N/L10N introduction? Adam Megacz
20:52 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
20:47 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
20:46 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
20:22 Re: Status of Bugzilla? David Edelsohn
20:17 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Bryce McKinlay
20:02 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Craig Rodrigues
19:38 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Craig Rodrigues
19:32 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Dewar
19:25 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
19:24 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Olivier Galibert
19:12 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Alexandre Oliva
19:08 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
19:02 Re: 17 GCC regressions, 8 new, with your patch on 2002-02-07T00:19:11Z. Andrew Pinski
18:49 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
18:43 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Lipe
18:36 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
18:32 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Kenneth Lareau
18:27 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
18:12 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Joseph S. Myers
18:06 Re: Status of Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
17:49 ADPI Randall
17:34 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Kenner
17:32 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
17:29 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Kenneth Lareau
17:28 Re: Status of Bugzilla? mike stump
17:21 Re: Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Joe Buck
17:17 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
17:09 Re: Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Richard Henderson
16:47 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Dewar
16:42 Re: Objective-C++ Ziemowit Laski
16:36 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Lipe
16:31 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Lipe
16:24 Re: Objective-C++ Joe Buck
16:23 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Joe Buck
16:13 ADPI Randall
16:12 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Dewar
16:09 LAPACK results for g77-3.1 on cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:08 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Robert Lipe
16:03 Status of Bugzilla? Craig Rodrigues
15:42 Re: Objective-C++ Stan Shebs
15:28 Re: Objective-C++ Mathieu Chouinard
15:21 Re: Objective-C++ Ziemowit Laski
15:08 Re: Objective-C++ Neil Booth
15:00 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
14:57 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
14:47 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
14:45 Re: Objective-C++ Stan Shebs
14:43 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Dale Johannesen
14:30 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Laurent Guerby
14:16 Re: installation question Alexandre Oliva
14:09 Re: installation question George.R.Goffe
14:09 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Laurent Guerby
14:04 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Geert Bosch
14:04 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
13:55 installation question Abhijit Shee
13:52 Re: a warning to implement mike stump
13:49 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem mike stump
13:17 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
13:16 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
13:09 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
13:08 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
13:06 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
13:02 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
13:01 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
12:58 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
12:57 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Richard Kenner
12:51 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Richard Henderson
12:50 Re: a warning to implement Jason Riedy
12:48 RE: Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Walton, Shane
12:38 Re: Sorting out the list of P4 issues Toon Moene
12:35 Re: Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Joe Buck
12:32 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
12:29 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
12:23 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
12:22 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Geert Bosch
12:22 Re: is libstdcv3 "supposed" to compile on mingw? Danny Smith
12:21 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
12:17 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Tim Hollebeek
12:13 Re: Objective-C++ Neil Booth
12:13 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? mike stump
12:08 Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Joe Buck
12:04 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem mike stump
11:57 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
11:56 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem mike stump
11:53 Re: Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Tim Prince
11:47 Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement) Tim Hollebeek
11:44 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
11:37 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
11:06 Re: Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jeff Sturm
10:51 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
10:50 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
10:49 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
10:17 Re: Need some help Alexandre Oliva
10:13 Build failure with 3.1 CVS on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Kenneth Lareau
10:07 Re: xscale-elf-gcc Arvind Krishnaswamy
10:02 New x86-64 port maintainer David Edelsohn
09:41 Can't build gcc-2.95.3 with g++ for m68k-elf Peter Barada
09:23 Re: GCC 3.0.3 Successful in AIX4.3.3 Janis Johnson
09:20 Re: a warning to implement Phil Edwards
09:19 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
09:18 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
09:18 Re: regression tester scripts now in gcc/contrib/regression Gerald Pfeifer
09:14 Re: [rfc] Wswitch test case (which fails) Gerald Pfeifer
09:13 Re: a warning to implement Gerald Pfeifer
09:03 Re: Changing code for old targets Richard Henderson
08:50 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
08:40 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
08:38 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
08:29 Re: a warning to implement Nathan Sidwell
08:29 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
08:03 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
08:01 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
07:58 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
07:56 Objective-C++ Mathieu Chouinard
07:51 Re: a warning to implement Kevin Handy
07:37 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
07:30 Re: a warning to implement Akim Demaille
06:56 Re: Sorting out the list of P4 issues Tom Womack
06:54 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
06:38 Pentium 4 Optimization Complimenting icc 5.0 Walton, Shane
06:35 Sorting out the list of P4 issues Tom Womack
06:24 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
06:17 GCC 3.0.3 Successful in AIX4.3.3 tapera
05:55 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
05:26 Re: a warning to implement Richard Sandiford
04:51 Re: Need some help Alcino Dall Igna Junior
04:40 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
04:32 Re: Help on gcc Alcino Dall Igna Junior
04:24 Changing code for old targets Philipp Thomas
04:11 Re: a warning to implement Richard Sandiford
03:32 Re: xscale-elf-gcc Richard Earnshaw
03:25 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Jan Hubicka
03:18 Re: (something of an absence of) SSE2 documentation Jan Hubicka
03:16 Re: gcc-3.1-20020204 does *not* support -mfp-math=sse Jan Hubicka
02:12 Re: Several snapshots on the same system? Andreas Jaeger
02:08 Re: a warning to implement Daniel Egger
02:00 Re: a warning to implement Akim Demaille
01:55 Re: a warning to implement Jeremy Sanders
01:50 Several snapshots on the same system? Tom Womack
01:50 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Tom Womack
01:50 Re: (something of an absence of) SSE2 documentation Tom Womack
01:50 gcc-3.1-20020204 ICE on SSE2 inline assembler Tom Womack
01:50 gcc-3.1-20020204 does *not* support -mfp-math=sse Tom Womack
01:43 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
01:43 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
01:39 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
01:32 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
01:11 Re: Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Paolo Carlini
01:05 ObjC++ Pirmin Braun
00:59 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
00:41 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
00:14 RE: Help on gcc Rupert Wood
00:12 RE: Help on gcc Rupert Wood
00:03 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Laurent Guerby

February 05, 2002
21:00 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
20:57 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
20:57 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Tim Prince
20:27 Re: Help on gcc Robert Dewar
20:16 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
20:14 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
20:12 Re: Help on gcc Robert Dewar
20:07 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
20:03 RE: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
19:56 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
19:41 Re: Need some help Andi Kleen
19:40 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
19:36 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
19:26 Re: GCC 3 to support ObjC++ Andrew Pinski
19:25 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
19:24 Re: Need some help Alexandre Oliva
19:19 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
19:18 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Craig Rodrigues
19:15 GCC 3 to support ObjC++ Martin H鋍ker
19:13 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Geert Bosch
19:05 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Geert Bosch
18:46 Re: Need some help Syed Naqvi
18:34 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
18:34 Re: Help on gcc Joe Buck
17:41 Re: Need some help Alexandre Oliva
17:39 Re: Help on gcc Alexandre Oliva
17:39 Re: Help on gcc Daniel Berlin
17:26 Re: Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Richard Henderson
17:04 Need some help Syed Naqvi
17:00 RE: a warning to implement Richard Almquist
17:00 Re: libstdc++/5601: stl_alloc.h:288: parse error before `[' tokenWhen using gcc-3.0.4pre today's cvs Kaoru Fukui
16:58 Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Roger Sayle
16:12 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
15:55 Re: Help on gcc Per Bothner
15:47 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
15:43 Re: Help on gcc Neil Booth
15:42 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
15:40 Re: Help on gcc Robert Lipe
15:37 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
15:28 Re: Help on gcc George.R.Goffe
15:23 Re: Help on gcc Diego Novillo
15:11 Re: gcc 3.0.3 build for StrongARM Erik Mouw
15:04 Re: rsync: gcc-cvs not available anymore? Christopher Faylor
15:03 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
15:00 Re: a warning to implement Phil Edwards
14:53 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
14:49 RE: a warning to implement Stephano Mariani
14:48 Re: Help on gcc James Dressler
14:48 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
14:47 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
14:38 Re: a warning to implement Michael Matz
14:29 Re: a warning to implement Tim Hollebeek
14:24 RE: a warning to implement Stephano Mariani
14:23 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:20 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
14:14 failures on 3.0.x branch Joel Sherrill
14:12 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
14:10 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
14:05 Re: a warning to implement Tim Hollebeek
13:52 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Geoff Keating
13:51 Re: a warning to implement Joe Buck
13:14 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Mark Mitchell
13:12 Re: -fno-leading-underscore error Alexandre Oliva
13:10 Re: Help on gcc Alexandre Oliva
13:08 Re: Strange question Daniel Egger
12:56 Re: GCJ on StrongARM based PocketPC2002 Tom Tromey
12:09 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem mike stump
12:02 GCJ on StrongARM based PocketPC2002 Barak
11:52 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Richard Henderson
11:30 Re: a warning to implement Tim Hollebeek
10:42 midRTL - virtualization Jan Hubicka
10:38 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
10:26 Re: gcc 3.0.3 build for StrongARM Alexandre Oliva
10:09 Help on gcc James Dressler
09:59 Re: a warning to implement Tim Hollebeek
09:48 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? David Edelsohn
09:44 Re: gcc 3.0.3 build for StrongARM Jeff Sturm
09:33 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
09:31 xscale-elf-gcc Arvind Krishnaswamy
08:49 RE: a warning to implement Bernard Dautrevaux
08:21 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
08:18 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
07:34 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
07:18 Re: rsync: gcc-cvs not available anymore? Daniel Berlin
07:16 -fno-leading-underscore error Dimitri Frederickx
07:14 Re: (something of an absence of) SSE2 documentation Jan Hubicka
06:48 gcc 3.0.3 build for StrongARM Heinz H鋌erle
06:25 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
06:25 GCC C++ bug Bo Thorsen
06:20 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
06:05 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
06:01 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
05:58 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
05:57 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Mark Mitchell
05:55 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
05:27 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem mike stump
05:12 rsync: gcc-cvs not available anymore? Andreas Jaeger
04:33 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
04:32 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
04:30 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Jan Hubicka
04:01 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Jan Hubicka
03:57 (something of an absence of) SSE2 documentation Tom Womack
03:52 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Tom Womack
03:33 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Tom Womack
01:00 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Richard Henderson
00:33 attn alpha testers Richard Henderson
00:33 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Richard Henderson

February 04, 2002
23:20 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
23:15 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
23:12 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
21:36 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Tim Prince
21:34 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
20:36 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Tim Prince
19:33 gcc-ss-20020204 is now available gccadmin
18:57 Re: is libstdc++-v3 "supposed" to compile on mingw? Adam Megacz
18:56 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
18:55 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joe Buck
18:49 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
18:48 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
18:42 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joseph S. Myers
18:36 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
18:21 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
17:54 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joe Buck
17:50 [kjelde@mips.com: Re: SNaN & QNaN on mips] H . J . Lu
17:35 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joseph S. Myers
17:35 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
17:33 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joe Buck
17:23 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
17:20 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Richard Henderson
17:14 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joseph S. Myers
17:13 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Richard Henderson
17:07 Re: Keeping unreachable code Richard Henderson
16:57 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
16:57 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
16:51 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
16:47 Re: PCH status?? Geoff Keating
16:36 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joe Buck
16:17 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
15:49 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
15:47 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
15:47 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joseph S. Myers
15:40 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
15:36 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
15:29 Re: is libstdc++-v3 "supposed" to compile on mingw? Craig Rodrigues
15:28 Re: PCH status?? Zack Weinberg
15:19 is libstdc++-v3 "supposed" to compile on mingw? Adam Megacz
14:26 Re: issue with mingw and __attribute__? [relevant bits from g++ -E] Artem Khodush
14:25 RE: Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:05 Re: issue with mingw and __attribute__? [relevant bits from g++ -E] Adam Megacz
14:01 issue with mingw and __attribute__? Adam Megacz
13:58 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Florian Weimer
13:12 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Richard Kenner
13:06 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Joseph S. Myers
13:01 Re: Build error on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0c Richard Kenner
12:55 Re: JVM Port Tom Tromey
12:50 Re: Is there an Ada testsuite? Christian J鰊sson
12:39 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Laurent Guerby
12:34 Re: Is there an Ada testsuite? Laurent Guerby
12:12 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Bob Wilson
11:55 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
11:47 Re: Typo. (off-topic) Per Bothner
11:33 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Jan Hubicka
11:28 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Jan Hubicka
11:25 2.95 branch still being maintained? Jason R Thorpe
11:20 Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3) Paul Koning
11:15 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Joe Buck
11:07 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
11:04 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
11:01 Re: Build error on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0c Loren James Rittle
11:00 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Eric Christopher
11:00 Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3) Eric Christopher
11:00 Re: SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Jan Hubicka
10:58 Re: Keeping unreachable code mike stump
10:54 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Jan Hubicka
10:51 Re: JVM Port Lars Brinkhoff
10:33 Re: Is there an Ada testsuite? Richard Kenner
10:32 Re: JVM Port Florian Weimer
10:12 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Carlo Wood
10:01 Re: JVM Port Robert Dewar
09:52 JVM Port Francis Grolemund
09:33 Re: Successful build of 3.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5 Janis Johnson
09:29 Re: Success after modifications: 3.0.3 i686-pc-cygwin (cygwin-1.3.5-3 on Windows XP Professional) Janis Johnson
09:24 Re: report of successful built Janis Johnson
09:05 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
08:45 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
08:37 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
08:37 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Andreas Jaeger
08:31 Re: Is there an Ada testsuite? Christian J鰊sson
08:09 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Corey Minyard
08:05 Build error on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0c Richard Kenner
08:03 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Rainer Orth
07:45 Re: gcc 3 and gnu libc Paolo Carlini
07:43 Re: gcc 3 and gnu libc Jakub Jelinek
07:43 Re: Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Robert Dewar
07:41 Re: gcc 3 and gnu libc Stefan Morrell
07:32 Success report on Linux/PPC, small Ada problem Corey Minyard
07:31 Re: Is there an Ada testsuite? Robert Dewar
07:02 Successful build of 3.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5 Arun Saini , Gurgaon
06:53 Re: Is there an Ada testsuite? Richard Kenner
06:50 Is it too late for libstdc++/5432 to make it into gcc-3.0.4? Andrew Pollard
05:49 Re: gcc 3 and gnu libc Paolo Carlini
05:44 gcc 3 and gnu libc Stefan Morrell
04:51 Can I build under Linux a gcc-3.1 which would work as mingw32? Tom Womack
04:50 Re: Keeping unreachable code Alexandre Oliva
04:47 Re: Keeping unreachable code Casper Hornstrup
04:41 SSE and SSE2 intrinsics Tom Womack
04:07 Re: Keeping unreachable code Alexandre Oliva
04:01 Is there an Ada testsuite? Christian J鰊sson
03:59 Re: Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Alexandre Oliva
01:55 Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3) Ralf Baechle
01:26 Re: GNU C++ Library: call for writers Phil Edwards

February 03, 2002
22:43 Re: GCC 3.0.4 Zack Weinberg
22:27 GCC 3.0.4 Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Tim Prince
17:53 Re: Keeping unreachable code Robert Dewar
17:23 Re: Keeping unreachable code Casper Hornstrup
17:11 Re: Keeping unreachable code Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:55 Re: Keeping unreachable code Robert Dewar
16:30 Re: Keeping unreachable code Casper Hornstrup
15:44 Success after modifications: 3.0.3 i686-pc-cygwin (cygwin-1.3.5-3 on Windows XP Professional) Jan Henrik Sylvester
15:29 Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3) cgd
15:18 Re: Keeping unreachable code Robert Dewar
15:15 Re: Keeping unreachable code Casper Hornstrup
14:53 Re: Strange question Robert Dewar
14:44 Re: Strange question David Edelsohn
14:40 Re: Strange question Robert Dewar
14:37 Re: Keeping unreachable code Robert Dewar
13:24 Re: Is the gcc CVS server hosed? Craig Rodrigues
13:21 Strange question Quentin Bouvart
13:15 Re: Keeping unreachable code Casper Hornstrup
12:52 Re: Is the gcc CVS server hosed? Christopher Faylor
12:47 Re: Is the gcc CVS server hosed? Craig Rodrigues
10:52 Re: Keeping unreachable code Robert Dewar
10:44 Re: Is the gcc CVS server hosed? H . J . Lu
10:39 Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't work Franz Sirl
10:13 Re: Keeping unreachable code Richard Henderson
09:22 Keeping unreachable code Casper Hornstrup
08:00 report of successful built =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?v/ggwb68rg=
07:32 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
07:04 Re: a warning to implement Andrey R. Urazov
06:39 Re: Typo. (off-topic) Per Bothner
06:30 Re: Typo. (off-topic) Robert Dewar
06:20 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
04:54 Re: a warning to implement Paolo Carlini
04:23 Re: a warning to implement Andrey R. Urazov
02:56 Re: Typo. (off-topic) Neil Booth
01:09 Re: c++/5577 (was: Re: c++/4862 and PRs...) H . J . Lu
00:49 Re: a warning to implement Gabriel Dos Reis
00:47 Re: Is the gcc CVS server hosed? Craig Rodrigues

February 02, 2002
23:16 Is the gcc CVS server hosed? H . J . Lu
21:46 Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3) Justin Carlson
18:55 Re: Typo. Tom Tromey
18:48 Re: Typo. Craig Rodrigues
18:46 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
18:45 Re: Typo. John Levon
18:23 Re: Typo. Tom Tromey
18:22 Re: Typo. Tom Tromey
18:22 Re: Grammatical errors. Tom Tromey
18:02 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
17:41 Re: [rfc] Wswitch test case (which fails) Joseph S. Myers
17:11 [rfc] Wswitch test case (which fails) Andrew Cagney
17:00 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
16:43 Re: Typo. (off-topic) Per Bothner
16:09 Re: a warning to implement Robert Dewar
16:05 Re: Typo. (off-topic) Tim Hollebeek
16:05 Re: a warning to implement Alexandre Oliva
15:57 Re: Typo. Alexandre Oliva
15:55 Re: Typo. (off-topic) Per Bothner
15:35 Re: Typo. Kevin Handy
15:24 Re: Typo. Robert Dewar
15:23 Re: Typo. Erik Mouw
14:42 Re: Typo. Robert Dewar
13:24 Re: Typo. Erik Mouw
13:01 Re: Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Arek
12:56 c++/5577 (was: Re: c++/4862 and PRs...) Paolo Carlini
12:52 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs H . J . Lu
12:49 Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3) Hartvig Ekner
12:20 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs Paolo Carlini
12:03 Re: PATCH: Fix ll/sc for mips (take 3) H . J . Lu
11:43 Re: sparcv9 help lucier
11:35 PROVEN Work at Home System that GENERATES FREE LEADS! Vincent
11:34 PROVEN Work at Home System that GENERATES FREE LEADS! Vincent
11:05 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs H . J . Lu
10:46 report of successful built =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?v/ggwb68rg=
10:00 report of successful built =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?v/ggwb68rg=
05:11 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs Paolo Carlini
04:54 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs Gabriel Dos Reis
04:30 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs Paolo Carlini
04:15 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs Gabriel Dos Reis
03:15 Re: c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs Paolo Carlini
02:57 c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs Paolo Carlini
02:45 Re: a warning to implement Paolo Carlini
02:31 Re: GNU C++ Library: call for writers Joseph S. Myers
01:26 a warning to implement Andrey R. Urazov

February 01, 2002
23:26 Re: Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Mike Laman
17:02 Re: alloca and c++ Joe Buck
17:00 GNU C++ Library: call for writers Phil Edwards
15:10 Re: alloca and c++ Ingo Krabbe
15:03 gcc compile/install question Jim M.
14:59 RE: Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:53 Re: alloca and c++ Ingo Krabbe
14:03 Re: Compiler errors... Alexandre Oliva
14:03 Re: Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Neil Booth
13:50 Re: Sparc bogosity Phil Edwards
13:46 Re: Re: alloca and c++ Devang Patel
13:29 Re: Sparc bogosity Toon Moene
13:29 Re: is REAL*16 available for g77? Toon Moene
12:35 Announcing libstdc++-v3.0.96 Benjamin Kosnik
12:27 Re: alloca and c++ Devang Patel
12:13 Re: alloca and c++ Gabriel Dos Reis
12:12 Re: alloca and c++ Michael Matz
11:16 Re: Sparc bogosity Richard Henderson
11:14 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Joe Buck
11:12 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
11:01 alloca and c++ Devang Patel
11:00 Problems upgrading from 2.95.3-5 to 3.X on cygwin Mack Lobell
10:57 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Richard Henderson
10:51 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
10:46 Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Richard Henderson
10:41 Re: floating point sse & sse2 Tim Prince
10:40 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Nicholas Adrian Vinen
10:32 Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions? Paolo Carlini
09:36 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Gabriel Dos Reis
09:17 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin? Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
09:14 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Joe Buck
08:36 Re: Update URL in AVR installation notes Craig Rodrigues
08:16 Re: Update URL in AVR installation notes Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
06:51 Update URL in AVR installation notes Marek Michalkiewicz
06:15 Re: Error making gcc compiler Richard Earnshaw
06:07 Re: floating point sse & sse2 Daniel Berlin
05:58 Re: floating point sse & sse2 Christoph Hellwig
05:58 Error making gcc compiler Dimitri Frederickx
05:42 Re: sun 0s -> gcc ERROR question Manfred Hollstein
05:31 Re: floating point sse & sse2 George.R.Goffe
05:07 floating point sse & sse2 rkm@usol.com
04:48 Re: Sparc bogosity Gabriel Dos Reis
04:24 (not) building gpc 19991030 on /alpha [patch] levi
01:22 Compiler errors... Dimitri Frederickx
01:06 is REAL*16 available for g77? JOERG SPECHT

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.1