This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Scheduling of asm()
- From: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:12:11 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Scheduling of asm()
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:35:47 -0800
> From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
> To: mike stump <mrs@windriver.com>
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:00:03AM -0800, mike stump wrote:
> > I'll go one farther. Any builtin that is expressible in normal C,
> > should be added to gcc as machine independent.
> No.
We actually agree. I was only talking about things that _are_
builtins. This is why I said `any builtin' above.
Anything that is recognized from C, should obviously not be a builtin,
and if there had been a builtin for it, we should remove it. The
preference is to recognize these things out of pure C. We don't do
that yet.