This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Scheduling of asm()

From: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Jan 2002 01:50:01 +0100
Subject: Re: Scheduling of asm()
References: <200201052350.PAA26912@kankakee.wrs.com><87hepzm6xl.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de><20020106161701.A24423@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 11:49:10PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > I'd end up with one builtin per opcode, which seems pretty silly,
> > since unlike for example prefetches, those don't exist on other
> > platforms.
> 
> We do support machine-specific builtins, and they are in use on a
> number of targets.
> 
> I'd rather go with the builtins, really.

Hmm, okay, I'll try that. I see i386 has lots of builtins already for
MMX, so I'll try to do it analogously.

        Falk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scheduling of asm()
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: Scheduling of asm()
  - From: mike stump
- Re: Scheduling of asm()
  - From: Falk Hueffner
- Re: Scheduling of asm()
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]