This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.


On Jan  1, 2002, Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> I really think that having
>> libgcc_s.so and any other libraries directly in $(libdir) is wrong,
>> precisely because of the multilib issue.

> Well, it's OK with me if you think it's wrong, but could you *please*
> change it for libg2c.so* in such a way that it will work when GCC-3.1 is
> installed as the system's compiler, i.e. using --prefix=/usr on the 15th
> of April, 2002 ?

Hmm...  I've been looking into it, and now I see that libstdc++ will
be installed in $(libdir) too, in the case of native compilers.  I was
missing this fact, that has probably changed a while ago without my
noticing.

What needs to be done is to convert the macro
GLIBCPP_EXPORT_INSTALL_INFO in libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 into
something suitable for libf2c, and use libf2c_toolexeclibdir or so
where we currently use libsubdir.

Do you have time to do it?  If not, I may add it to my LINO (*) to-do
list.

(*) Last in, never out :-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]