This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.

From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 23:55:32 +0100
Subject: Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
References: <20011230133758.2C21BF2E47@nile.gnat.com> <orbsge0x68.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <3C321637.2CA868C3@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <orpu4tznyb.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> I really think that having
> libgcc_s.so and any other libraries directly in $(libdir) is wrong,
> precisely because of the multilib issue.

Well, it's OK with me if you think it's wrong, but could you *please*
change it for libg2c.so* in such a way that it will work when GCC-3.1 is
installed as the system's compiler, i.e. using --prefix=/usr on the 15th
of April, 2002 ?

Thanks,

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Re: "GNU" and Ada
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in.
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]