gcc archive
date index for January, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2002
23:59 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Neil Booth
22:16 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Nicholas Adrian Vinen
20:29 Re: Sparc bogosity Geoff Keating
20:27 regression tester scripts now in gcc/contrib/regression Geoff Keating
19:13 Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava Tom Tromey
16:07 Re: Sparc bogosity Jeff Sturm
15:31 Re: PR 5304 is still broken in gcc-20020128 Paolo Carlini
15:31 Re: Sparc bogosity Brad Lucier
15:30 Re: sun 0s -> gcc ERROR question Alexandre Oliva
15:26 Re: Sparc bogosity Robert Lipe
15:23 PR 5304 is still broken in gcc-20020128 Peter Barada
15:21 Re: gcc-3.0.4pre build on arm-linux Alexandre Oliva
15:10 Re: Sparc bogosity George.R.Goffe
14:54 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Ulrich Weigand
14:49 Re: Sparc bogosity Robert Lipe
14:16 Re: Sparc bogosity Geoff Keating
14:05 Typo. Tommy Dugandzic
13:59 Typo. Tommy Dugandzic
13:52 Re: PCH status?? Geoff Keating
13:44 Re: PCH status?? Timothy J. Wood
13:22 Sparc bogosity lucier
13:09 Grammatical errors. Tommy Dugandzic
12:46 son compler->gcc ERROR questino Jim M.
12:45 sun 0s -> gcc ERROR question Jim M.
11:21 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin? Tim Prince
10:57 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Geoff Keating
10:54 Re: PCH status?? Geoff Keating
10:20 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] Richard Kenner
10:15 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] law
10:03 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] law
09:51 Re:Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
09:44 RE: mips structure padding Todd Malsbary
08:56 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Zack Weinberg
08:26 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Nicholas Adrian Vinen
08:18 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Paul Koning
07:49 Re: GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Ingo Krabbe
07:16 Re: Java--C++ interface Anthony Green
07:09 Java--C++ interface Alain Hebert
06:52 WINCE Dimitri Frederickx
05:53 GCC 3.0.3 produces large code Nicholas Adrian Vinen
05:49 gcc-3.0.4pre build on arm-linux jeroen dobbelaere
05:18 RE: ICE on h8300-hms target Kazu Hirata
04:13 Bootstrap failure on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1 Richard Kenner
04:04 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Richard Earnshaw
02:48 Re: mips structure padding Fergus Henderson
01:42 Re: HP-UX Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai
01:38 PCH status?? Paolo Carlini
01:34 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Alexandre Oliva
00:49 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin? Robert Collins
00:49 RE: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin? Bernard Dautrevaux
00:37 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin? Mack Lobell

January 30, 2002
19:31 Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava Bryce McKinlay
19:23 RE:Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
18:41 Re: BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava Bryce McKinlay
18:01 Re: which GCC version old or new? Craig Rodrigues
18:00 Re: which GCC version old or new? mike stump
17:36 which GCC version old or new? Goodwin, Kevin M.
17:24 Re: How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin? Benjamin Scherrey
17:20 "" po_owen
17:13 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Richard Henderson
17:13 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Greg McGary
17:07 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Richard Henderson
17:02 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Richard Henderson
16:50 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars law
16:36 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Ulrich Weigand
16:19 Re: HP-UX Joe Buck
15:32 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Alexandre Oliva
15:19 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Greg McGary
15:18 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Ulrich Weigand
15:08 write permission comparison with Linux mike stump
14:25 RE: mips structure padding mike stump
14:15 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Geoff Keating
13:56 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Alexandre Oliva
13:53 Re: successful GCC 3.0.3 alphaev5-dec-osf4.0g build Janis Johnson
13:49 Re: Gcj Errors Alexandre Oliva
13:43 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Ulrich Weigand
13:35 RE: gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
13:30 Re: Gcj Errors Tom Tromey
13:28 RE: mips structure padding Todd Malsbary
12:42 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars law
12:41 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Alexandre Oliva
12:41 How do i upgrade to gcc 3.X on cygwin? Mack Lobell
12:36 Re: HP-UX Alexandre Oliva
12:33 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT Mack Lobell
12:31 Re: Gcj Errors Alexandre Oliva
11:55 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Greg McGary
11:38 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core Andrey Petrov
11:33 Re: condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars law
11:23 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Zack Weinberg
11:22 successful GCC 3.0.3 alphaev5-dec-osf4.0g build Richard Jackson
11:06 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Nathanael Nerode
11:00 =---Live 20 years longer with HGH---= 84221111000000000000 doctorluhgh34842211
11:00 condition codes, haifa-sched and virtual-stack-vars Greg McGary
10:59 =---Live 20 years longer with HGH---= 39191397654433332222221 doctorluhgh34391913
10:52 =---Live 20 years longer with HGH---= 2814975443322222111 doctorluhgh34281497
09:07 BOEHM-GC,GCC 3.0.3 and libjava Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
08:59 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Daniel Jacobowitz
08:50 Re: Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed Craig Rodrigues
08:14 Re: Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed Tim Prince
07:48 Re: Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed Joe Buck
06:16 Tried making egcs 1.1.2 on RedHat 7.2 and failed =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?wPzBvsfK?=
05:52 HP-UX Ehrke, Christian
05:29 Run time error on Sol8 x86 Suphi Cenk Agar
05:24 Re: gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms Atro Tossavainen
04:22 Correct comparison to the intrinsics table, was: Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
03:36 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Richard Earnshaw
03:32 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Richard Earnshaw
00:36 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
00:20 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Phil Edwards
00:08 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Adrian von Bidder

January 29, 2002
23:29 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Nathanael Nerode
22:57 Support for C16x/ST10 bas.mevissen
22:21 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Joe Buck
21:30 Re: Developing a Once-install and throw-away-CD mechanism Per Bothner
21:08 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. David Edelsohn
21:06 autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Nathanael Nerode
20:47 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
20:30 Re: mips structure padding Eric Christopher
20:22 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. David Edelsohn
20:16 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:13 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. David Edelsohn
18:21 RE: Fortran testsuite problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:08 RE: Fortran testsuite problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:53 Re: mips structure padding mike stump
17:30 RE: Fortran testsuite problem Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:51 RE: Fortran testsuite problem Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:41 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
15:58 Re: Fortran testsuite problem Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:49 Re: Static variable addressing Richard Henderson
15:00 Re: 2nd problem Nix
14:32 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] law
14:04 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Richard Henderson
13:58 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Paul Koning
13:46 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Richard Henderson
13:39 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] Jim Wilson
13:21 Re: new photos from my party! Alexandre Oliva
12:21 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT Jan Reimers
12:02 Static variable addressing (addendum) Joy Mukherjee
11:33 gcc3.0.3 Edward Lartey
10:55 Static variable addressing Joy Mukherjee
10:31 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT Mack Lobell
09:14 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] Richard Earnshaw
09:06 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] Richard Kenner
09:05 Re: Install gcc Janis Johnson
08:20 Re: paradoxical subreg problem [ patch attached ] law
08:10 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. David Edelsohn
08:00 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
05:13 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Earnshaw
05:07 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Earnshaw
04:30 Build for Windows CE ? Vince Lewis
02:44 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Phil Blundell
02:24 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Adrian von Bidder
02:03 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Philipp Thomas
01:57 ICE on h8300-hms target Rekha Deshmukh
00:12 How to get dos path's in the debug information? Mack Lobell

January 28, 2002
22:51 HEY YOU .don't miss this johnrico
22:12 Re: Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it? Richard Henderson
22:10 Re: Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it? Jason R Thorpe
22:02 Re: Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it? Richard Henderson
21:55 Soft FP in libgcc -- how to disable it? Jason R Thorpe
19:33 þûпˣ㻹 3346572
19:25 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Jim Wilson
18:50 Re: new photos from my party! Carlo Wood
18:24 gcc-ss-20020128 is now available gccadmin
18:14 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
18:05 mips structure padding Todd Malsbary
17:41 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Alexandre Oliva
17:40 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
17:28 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
17:18 Install gcc Martin York
17:11 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
16:28 RE: Problems building cross compiler on NT Chet Simpson
16:15 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
16:09 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
15:59 Re: new photos from my party! Andrew Pinski
15:52 new photos from my party! remero
15:50 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
15:43 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
15:41 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
15:41 Re: gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms Albert Chin
15:37 Fortran testsuite problem John David Anglin
15:21 Re: Problems building cross compiler on NT Zack Weinberg
15:20 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
14:59 Re: Problems building cross compiler on NT Neil Booth
14:53 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Geoff Keating
14:25 Problems building cross compiler on NT Mack Lobell
13:47 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Jim Wilson
13:46 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
13:25 Re: empty loop elimination (lack of) ? Andrew Pinski
13:18 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Kenner
13:10 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
13:03 empty loop elimination (lack of) ? Cyrille Chepelov
13:03 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
12:47 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Michael Matz
12:47 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Dale Johannesen
12:39 Re: paradoxical subreg problem David Edelsohn
12:18 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Kenner
12:15 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Henderson
12:15 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
12:09 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Marc Espie
12:05 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
12:03 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Kenner
11:58 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
11:50 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Henderson
11:40 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Kenner
11:37 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Michael Matz
11:36 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
11:28 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
11:23 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Henderson
11:06 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Kenner
11:02 Re: paradoxical subreg problem law
10:51 Re: paradoxical subreg problem Richard Henderson
10:43 Re: ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Richard Henderson
10:39 Re: bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127 Richard Henderson
10:33 paradoxical subreg problem law
10:24 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config.gcc config/netbsd-aou ... Jason R Thorpe
10:17 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config.gcc config/netbsd-aou ... Richard Earnshaw
10:11 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config.gcc config/netbsd-aou ... Jason R Thorpe
09:59 Re: Java & aliasing question Richard Henderson
09:58 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
09:40 Re: Successful build of GCC 3.0.3 Janis Johnson
09:22 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
09:01 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Joe Buck
08:33 Java & aliasing question Bryce McKinlay
08:14 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Zack Weinberg
07:52 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Florian Weimer
07:50 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Paul Koning
07:44 Successful build of GCC 3.0.3 Patrick Hartling
07:44 ARM THUMB: fundamental bug in handling of far jumps? Adrian von Bidder
05:59 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Tim Prince
05:16 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64 Duraid Madina
04:58 Re: bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127 Roman Zippel
04:53 Re: bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127 Andreas Schwab
04:46 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Jan Hubicka
04:32 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64 Richard B. Kreckel
04:24 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Petr Vandrovec
04:13 bootstrap error on m68k-linux with CVS HEAD 20020127 Matthias Klose
03:03 Re: compare instructions Dmitry
02:08 RE: Developing a Once-install and throw-away-CD mechanism Rupert Wood
01:56 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc Phil Blundell
01:22 Developing a Once-install and throw-away-CD mechanism snodx

January 27, 2002
23:50 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Andreas Jaeger
23:37 Re: GCJ: Java generics ala Sun JDK1.5 Fergus Henderson
23:21 gcc 3.0.3 / SGI 64-bit platforms Atro Tossavainen
22:21 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64 Andreas Jaeger
20:43 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64 Daniel Berlin
20:34 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64 Scott Robert Ladd
19:49 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64 marius aamodt eriksen
19:36 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark - don't forget ia64 Duraid Madina
19:24 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted DJ Delorie
18:19 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc Jason R Thorpe
18:07 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc Arvind Krishnaswamy
17:59 Re: gprof and xscale-elf-gcc Jason R Thorpe
17:04 gprof and xscale-elf-gcc Arvind Krishnaswamy
16:28 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Tim Prince
16:28 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Tim Prince
16:28 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Tim Prince
13:17 Re: errno values: poll Ross Smith
13:01 Question about PR 5478 Craig Rodrigues
12:28 Re: errno values: poll Jamie Lokier
09:59 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
09:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Dan Nicolaescu
09:12 Re: Please help baby C programmer... Paolo Carlini
09:11 RE: Please help baby C programmer... Stephano Mariani
08:59 Please help baby C programmer... Ron Hudson
06:45 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
06:12 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
05:58 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Andreas Jaeger
05:57 RE: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Scott Robert Ladd
05:34 RE: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
05:11 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Claus Fischer
04:45 Re: [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Florian Weimer
04:34 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
03:48 [OT] GCC vs Intel C++ compiler benchmark Claus Fischer
03:45 RE: c anc c++ compiling Stephano Mariani
03:00 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Marc Espie
01:12 c anc c++ compiling ratnadeep joshi

January 26, 2002
23:52 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
22:02 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
18:35 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Tom Tromey
17:40 reload question Chris Lattner
16:37 Come Join The Fun stacie2180655
14:08 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged with mainline Diego Novillo
12:04 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
03:46 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
01:58 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Robert Dewar
00:01 Report to Recipient(s) MailEX
00:00 Report to Recipient(s) MailEX

January 25, 2002
23:59 CUM see the hottest bitches on the net...for pennies urstrully
23:59 CUM see the hottest bitches on the net...for pennies urstrully
22:14 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Bryce McKinlay
20:22 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
20:14 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
19:41 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Bryce McKinlay
18:55 RE: New x86 target (OS-9/x86) Chet Simpson
18:48 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
18:37 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
18:25 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
18:20 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
18:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
18:08 Re: sparc.c bogus comparison DJ Delorie
17:58 Re: ppc question for altivec Dale Johannesen
17:37 Strange testsuite/thread/pthread1.cc H . J . Lu
17:32 ppc question for altivec mike stump
17:24 Re: gcc-3.0.3 build success Janis Johnson
16:41 Re: loop optimizations Richard Henderson
16:39 Re: sparc.c bogus comparison Richard Henderson
16:20 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
16:11 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
16:04 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
16:03 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
15:48 gcc-3.0.3 build success stevenzg
15:43 Nouvelles acquisitions / New online AaZbooks.com
15:43 Nouvelles acquisitions / New online AaZbooks.com
15:41 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
15:34 Re: compare instructions Jan Hubicka
15:31 Re: loop optimizations Jan Hubicka
15:23 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
15:13 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
14:57 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Dan Nicolaescu
14:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
14:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Neil Booth
14:47 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
14:41 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
14:21 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
14:19 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
14:09 sparc.c bogus comparison DJ Delorie
13:57 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted Nathanael Nerode
13:50 Re: g++ and aliasing bools mike stump
13:49 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Tim Hollebeek
13:41 want to fill out copyright assignment for gcc Nathanael Nerode
13:29 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
13:16 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
13:07 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Gabriel Dos Reis
13:03 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Gabriel Dos Reis
12:28 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
12:23 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
12:11 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken law
12:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
12:09 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
12:06 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
12:05 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
11:53 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
11:53 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
11:45 Re: g2++comp availability Joe Buck
11:45 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
11:45 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
11:38 Re: g++ and aliasing bools mike stump
11:37 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
11:36 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
11:13 Re: Aliasing fun mike stump
10:54 g2++comp availability Brunken, Jere N, ALINF
10:39 Re: g++ and aliasing bools David Edelsohn
10:35 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h Jeff Sturm
10:21 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core Jeff Sturm
10:17 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
10:15 Re: Aliasing fun Daniel Berlin
10:00 Re: Aliasing fun Robert Dewar
09:56 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
09:49 Re: Aliasing fun Daniel Berlin
09:39 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
09:36 Re: Aliasing fun Daniel Berlin
09:28 Re: Aliasing fun Robert Dewar
09:21 Re: Aliasing fun Daniel Berlin
09:13 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
09:05 Re: PDF manual files Joseph S. Myers
08:59 Re: Aliasing fun Robert Dewar
08:58 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Joe Buck
08:58 Re: Aliasing fun Daniel Berlin
08:55 Re: Aliasing fun Joe Buck
08:54 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
08:54 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
08:53 Re: Aliasing fun Robert Dewar
08:53 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
08:49 Re: Aliasing fun Daniel Berlin
08:49 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken law
08:39 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
08:38 Re: Aliasing fun Robert Dewar
08:35 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
08:35 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
08:33 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
08:32 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
08:31 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
08:28 Aliasing fun Daniel Berlin
08:20 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
08:18 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
08:11 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
08:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Richard Kenner
08:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
08:09 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Robert Lipe
08:05 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
08:03 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
07:51 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
07:38 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
07:33 I meant PostScript manual files Nielsen Linus (ext)
07:30 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale Phil Blundell
07:30 PDF manual files Nielsen Linus (ext)
07:24 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken law
07:23 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale Arvind Krishnaswamy
07:17 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
07:05 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Robert Dewar
07:05 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
06:36 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Richard Kenner
06:34 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Richard Kenner
06:04 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
05:46 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Richard Kenner
05:23 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
05:14 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Richard Kenner
05:01 Re: Access to symbol table from within a program Sebastian Pop
04:45 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX? Adrian von Bidder
04:43 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
04:35 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX? Phil Blundell
04:31 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
04:17 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX? Adrian von Bidder
03:10 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale Richard Earnshaw
03:06 Re: ldreqd instruction in arm version 4? Richard Earnshaw
03:04 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale Richard Earnshaw
02:42 Re: ARM thumb: why call_via_rX? Phil Blundell
02:30 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
02:25 ARM thumb: why call_via_rX? Adrian von Bidder
02:16 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Gabriel Dos Reis
02:04 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale Phil Blundell
00:45 compare instructions Dmitry
00:39 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
00:01 loop optimizations Marko Mlinar

January 24, 2002
23:56 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Marko Mlinar
23:51 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
23:17 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Gabriel Dos Reis
21:24 Re: Problems debugging on irix Steve Christiansen
21:11 Re: errno values: poll Ross Smith
21:06 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h David O'Brien
19:59 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
19:58 Re: errno values: poll Kim Sebo
19:44 Re: errno values: poll George.R.Goffe
19:40 RE: errno values: poll Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:39 Re: errno values: poll Robert Lipe
19:36 Re: New x86 target Richard Henderson
19:05 Re: errno values: poll law
19:04 New x86 target Chet Simpson
18:52 Re: errno values: poll marius aamodt eriksen
18:51 Re: errno values: poll Richard Henderson
18:47 errno values: poll Zack Weinberg
18:30 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Tom Tromey
18:13 Re: ldreqd instruction in arm version 4? Arvind Krishnaswamy
17:58 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Tom Tromey
17:57 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
17:56 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken Richard Kenner
17:45 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h Richard Kenner
17:13 question about gcj -fjni code Tom Tromey
17:10 $ellOnline Fast Secure and Easy e Catalog Order
17:10 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h Jeff Sturm
17:06 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core Richard Henderson
17:01 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Richard Henderson
17:00 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core Jeff Sturm
16:52 Re: ldreqd instruction in xscale Alan Lehotsky
16:52 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h mike stump
16:51 Re: Help needed with sparc Richard Henderson
16:42 Problems debugging on irix Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:34 RE: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Boehm, Hans
16:17 RE: What does assembly-time constant mean? Kazu Hirata
16:14 Re: Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken DJ Delorie
16:09 Unaligned block moves and MEM_ALIGN re-broken David Edelsohn
15:36 Re: What does assembly-time constant mean? Alexandre Oliva
15:30 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core Jeff Sturm
15:18 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h Jeff Sturm
15:08 Re: What does assembly-time constant mean? Neil Booth
15:06 RE: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:57 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core Brad Lucier
14:45 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Richard Kenner
14:40 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
14:35 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Richard Kenner
14:33 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Dan Nicolaescu
14:32 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Paolo Carlini
14:30 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
14:29 Re: sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core George.R.Goffe
14:27 Re: permission to be maintainer for Xtensa port Joseph S. Myers
14:16 Re: Access to symbol table from within a program Joe Buck
14:15 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
14:13 ldreqd instruction in xscale Arvind Krishnaswamy
14:09 Re: libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 Per Bothner
13:59 libjava failed to build on Linux/x86 H . J . Lu
13:57 sparcv9 bootstrap failure; gengenrtl dumps core Alexander Poquet
13:43 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
13:34 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
13:26 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Mark Mitchell
13:11 What does assembly-time constant mean? Kazu Hirata
12:50 Re: Help needed with sparc Jeff Sturm
12:27 Re: Access to symbol table from within a program John Levon
12:22 Access to symbol table from within a program linguist-gcc
12:20 Re: Help needed with sparc Jakub Jelinek
12:16 Re: [openrisc] Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Damjan Lampret
11:30 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions mike stump
11:11 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Robert Lipe
10:36 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions David Edelsohn
10:26 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions mike stump
10:23 Re: Help needed with sparc Jeff Sturm
10:20 Re: mips64 inline question d p chang
10:11 Re: g++ compiler Joe Buck
09:52 Re: g++ compiler mike stump
09:41 NetBSD maintainer (was: [patch] Clean up NetBSD configs, fix NetBSDELF configs) Gerald Pfeifer
09:36 permission to be maintainer for Xtensa port Bob Wilson
09:36 strlen and atoi coredumps Olenin, Vladimir
09:34 Re: ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h Zack Weinberg
09:25 ANSI string concatenation in i386/cygwin.h David O'Brien
08:36 Re: libjava does not build Tom Tromey
08:17 libjava does not build Andreas Schwab
07:54 Re: gcc on Reliant unix (siemens) Joe Buck
07:44 Re: Help needed with sparc Jeff Sturm
07:34 gcc on Reliant unix (siemens) Yildiz, Murat
06:19 GCC Installation Problem Mike Liford
06:00 Re: Symbol versioning problem? Different versions of same symbol being called. Carlo Wood
03:38 Re: Symbol versioning problem? Different versions of same symbol being called. Alan Modra
01:22 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Marko Mlinar

January 23, 2002
23:18 Re: Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
22:45 g++ compiler thomas joseph
22:10 Re: mips64 inline question d p chang
22:01 possible bug in cygwin Danish Samad
22:01 Re: mips64 inline question Richard Henderson
21:48 Re: mips64 inline question d p chang
21:36 Re: mips64 inline question Richard Henderson
21:06 Re: mips64 inline question d p chang
20:55 Re: mips64 inline question d p chang
20:48 Re: Help needed with sparc Alexandre Oliva
19:16 Re: Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
18:48 Re: Help needed with sparc Alexandre Oliva
18:44 Re: mips64 inline question d p chang
18:39 Re: Help needed with sparc Alexandre Oliva
18:27 Re: Help needed with sparc Michael Snyder
18:26 Re: Help needed with sparc Andrew Cagney
18:20 Re: Help needed with sparc Alexandre Oliva
18:10 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
17:56 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Dan Nicolaescu
17:56 Re: mips64 inline question Richard Henderson
17:38 Re: Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
17:21 Re: g++ and aliasing bools Daniel Berlin
17:20 Re: Help needed with sparc Daniel Jacobowitz
17:09 Re: mips64 inline question d p chang
16:53 Re: Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
16:38 g++ and aliasing bools Dan Nicolaescu
16:34 Symbol versioning problem? Different versions of same symbol being called. Carlo Wood
16:07 Re: Help needed with sparc Jeff Sturm
15:47 mips64 inline question d p chang
15:36 problems building GCC Tom Crispin
15:34 Re: GCJ: Java generics ala Sun JDK1.5 Tom Tromey
15:16 Re: Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
14:51 Re: Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
14:44 GCJ: Java generics ala Sun JDK1.5 David Jung
14:44 Re: Help needed with sparc Jeff Sturm
14:41 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? mike stump
14:31 Re: libc core dump George.R.Goffe
13:25 Re: Severe Tire Damage Alexandre Oliva
13:15 Severe Tire Damage Neil Booth
13:11 Re: Help needed with sparc Jeff Sturm
13:02 Re: Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
12:59 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions mike stump
12:27 --enable-threads flag in precompiled gcc Olenin, Vladimir
12:20 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc law
12:01 libc core dump Olenin, Vladimir
11:43 Re: Help needed with sparc Alexander Poquet
11:36 Re: GCC 3.0.3 Question Joe Buck
11:29 Help needed with sparc Brad Lucier
11:08 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc Richard Henderson
10:36 Re: GCC >= 3 problems Neil Booth
10:08 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? Zack Weinberg
10:07 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? Gabriel Dos Reis
09:50 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? Joe Buck
09:43 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Joe Buck
08:33 GCC 3.0.3 Question Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
07:45 Re: What does "pure virtual method called" error mean? Craig Rodrigues
07:31 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions law
07:24 Re: What does "pure virtual method called" error mean? Alexandre Oliva
07:15 Re: ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Craig Rodrigues
07:04 ports to 2.96 and 3.1 versions Marko Mlinar
06:28 g++ compiler thomas joseph
05:56 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc law
05:35 Re: GCC >= 3 problems Paolo Carlini
05:09 GCC >= 3 problems Steve Marotta
03:59 Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don'twork Gerald Pfeifer
01:24 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc Jan Hubicka
00:53 What does "pure virtual method called" error mean? Abizar
00:07 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? Zack Weinberg

January 22, 2002
23:49 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Lars Brinkhoff
19:02 Re: a quicky about gcj command line Bryce McKinlay
18:01 new command-line option idea Joshua Haberman
17:42 Re: Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc Reva Cuthbertson
17:19 Dead code elimination of dead structure assignments in gcc Reva Cuthbertson
17:08 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? Craig Rodrigues
16:56 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? Zack Weinberg
16:41 Re: [testcase] ia64 retaddr elimination failure Geoff Keating
15:34 Re: DECL_ALIGN Richard Henderson
15:28 Re: DECL_ALIGN Neil Booth
15:09 Re: DECL_ALIGN Richard Henderson
15:08 Re: What does "internal error #20000524"? Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
15:02 What does "internal error #20000524"? Craig Rodrigues
14:10 DECL_ALIGN Neil Booth
13:31 Re: [testcase] ia64 retaddr elimination failure Richard Henderson
13:22 Re: [testcase] ia64 retaddr elimination failure Geoff Keating
13:18 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joe Buck
13:06 Re: Loop oddity John David Anglin
12:57 Re: Loop oddity Tom Crispin
12:04 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments law
11:37 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
11:18 Re: Loop oddity mike stump
11:15 compiling current cvs sparcv9-solaris-2 Alexander Poquet
11:12 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Paul Koning
11:12 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Richard Kenner
10:20 Re: Loop oddity John David Anglin
10:09 Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't work Richard Henderson
09:48 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Lars Brinkhoff
09:45 Re: Loop oddity Tom Crispin
09:39 Re: build successful - gcc 3.1 20020121 Janis Johnson
09:34 Re: Loop oddity law
09:08 Loop oddity John David Anglin
09:04 Re: reload problem: dimmy
08:51 Re: reload problem: Alexandre Oliva
08:47 build successful - gcc 3.1 20020121 ben woodhead
08:40 Re: reload problem: dimmy
08:23 Re: reload problem: Alexandre Oliva
07:56 Re: reload problem: dimmy
07:27 Re: reload problem: Alexandre Oliva
07:03 RE: static initialization of an array Huber, George CECOM RDEC STCD
06:59 Re: Optimizations on long long multiply/divide on PowerPC32 don't work Franz Sirl
06:53 Re: reload problem: Dmitry
06:45 Re: reload problem: Alexandre Oliva
06:05 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Jason Merrill
06:04 Re: Two-stage lookup for templates in 3.1? Jason Merrill
04:58 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Reichelt
03:31 Re: Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Reichelt

January 21, 2002
19:12 gcc-ss-20020121 is now available gccadmin
16:50 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Richard Henderson
14:47 Re: constructor calling order Joe Buck
14:27 New Java Swing web-enabling technology - you have to see it to believe it CreamTec News
14:26 New Java Swing web-enabling technology - you have to see it to believe it CreamTec News
14:08 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Geoff Keating
13:12 [Fortran] Lapack test suite results for i686-pc-linux-gnu on themain line (regressions) Peter Schmid
12:59 Re: constructor calling order mike stump
12:30 Bug in gcc-20020114: m68k doesn't use tstsf/tstdf patterns Peter Barada
11:42 Plan for bug-fixing g77-3.1. Toon Moene
10:58 Re: issues trying to add ColdFire v4e FPU support to gcc-20020107 Richard Henderson
09:54 reload problem: dimmy
09:37 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Mark Mitchell
09:34 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Zack Weinberg
09:25 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Gerald Pfeifer
09:04 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Zack Weinberg
08:51 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin Janis Johnson
08:45 Re: Build Status for GCC 3.0 Janis Johnson
08:44 Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin T X
08:42 Re: successful build Janis Johnson
08:00 static initialization of an array Massimiliano Cialdi
07:58 Re: static initialization of an array Jakub Jelinek
07:52 static initialization of an array Massimiliano Cialdi
06:57 Build Status for GCC 3.0 Warren Gaspar
05:29 Re: GCC 3.0.3 20020121 fails to compile with glibc 2.2.5 ? Frdric L. W. Meunier
05:12 GCC 3.0.3 20020121 fails to compile with glibc 2.2.5 ? Frdric L. W. Meunier
01:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Zack Weinberg
01:20 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Gerald Pfeifer

January 20, 2002
23:11 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Neil Booth
22:40 Re: RTL creation Zack Weinberg
22:04 RTL creation Danish Samad
20:36 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Mark Mitchell
20:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Zack Weinberg
19:48 GCC 3.0.4 GCC 3.0.4 Mark Mitchell
19:42 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Mark Mitchell
19:38 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Mark Mitchell
17:14 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips H . J . Lu
16:26 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips Rene Rebe
15:39 Re: ARM/Thumb mixed code Arvind Krishnaswamy
15:36 Re: ARM/Thumb mixed code Alexandre Oliva
14:59 ARM/Thumb mixed code Arvind Krishnaswamy
13:33 Issues with limbo DIEs in dwarf2out.c Richard Kenner
12:53 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips Jakub Jelinek
12:49 Re: Two-stage lookup for templates in 3.1? Paolo Carlini
12:45 Re: gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips H . J . Lu
12:07 Two-stage lookup for templates in 3.1? Alaeddin A. Aydiner
11:58 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
11:57 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
11:39 gcc 3.1 20020118 miscompiled ld.so on Linux/mips H . J . Lu
11:37 Re: Standards question: va_list vs. va_list * Ulrich Weigand
10:45 Re: constructor calling order Alexander Sieb
08:08 zhuhai newspaper
07:24 Cuidado com o BPI renato cm figueiredo
07:24 Cuidado com o BPI renato cm figueiredo
06:04 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Richard B. Kreckel
03:13 Non-Unified Memory Machine Benjamin

January 19, 2002
23:43 successful build Kevin Franden
13:17 Re: Standards question: va_list vs. va_list * Geoff Keating
11:29 Re: termios.h for arm-elf-gcc? Philip Blundell
11:25 termios.h for arm-elf-gcc? Arvind Krishnaswamy
09:50 Standards question: va_list vs. va_list * Ulrich Weigand
07:54 Re: eon performance regression Jan Hubicka
07:37 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? (Re: new PR libstdc++/5432) Andrew Pollard
05:01 Re: QNX Port Robert Dewar
04:02 Re: Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted Osku Salerma
03:42 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Richard Earnshaw
03:32 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Gabriel Dos Reis
03:11 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Richard Earnshaw

January 18, 2002
19:29 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Gabriel Dos Reis
18:56 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Alexandre Oliva
17:46 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Gabriel Dos Reis
17:44 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Gabriel Dos Reis
16:31 Re: successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch Janis Johnson
16:13 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
15:38 Re: successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch Tom Crispin
15:15 Re: successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch Janis Johnson
15:11 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Andreas Schwab
15:10 Re: QNX Port Joe Buck
13:23 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
12:42 Hey there YourPal21
12:39 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
12:29 arch lists Tom Lord
12:29 Re: Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted Geoff Keating
12:21 Re: Get your diploma in days ali handuleh
12:00 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
11:55 Re: Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted mike stump
11:37 Testcase for strict-aliasing wanted Osku Salerma
11:27 Re: QNX Port Nick Clifton
11:21 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc Nick Clifton
11:09 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc Arvind Krishnaswamy
10:08 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as? Brad Lucier
10:00 [Q] Register mapping in Call Frame Instructions Bharadwaj Yadavalli
09:26 Re: typed memory objects Joe Buck
09:23 Re: QNX Port Andy Olson
08:42 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Paul Koning
08:35 Re: your patch broke darwin libffi Andreas Tobler
08:05 Re: your patch broke darwin libffi David Edelsohn
08:02 Re: GCC Output Tim Prince
07:34 Re: eon performance regression Jason Merrill
07:30 Re: ColdFire v4e FPU addressing problems Peter Barada
06:33 Re: eon performance regression Jan Hubicka
05:59 Distributing new GCC releases on ftp.gnu.org -- conventions Bonzini
05:34 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries Jason Merrill
04:57 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries Jason Merrill
04:53 Help g++ problem. cesar tejeda
04:44 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries Bill Hoffman
04:40 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries Jason Merrill
03:33 2.95.4 release ? Frdric L. W. Meunier
02:49 Re: g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries Jason Merrill
02:37 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc Richard Earnshaw
02:33 typed memory objects aditya
02:24 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Richard Earnshaw
02:01 GCC Output David Mc Kenna
01:30 Re: build status for cross builds? Gerald Pfeifer
01:07 Re: QNX Port Joseph S. Myers

January 17, 2002
23:41 your patch broke darwin libffi Andreas Tobler
22:01 Re: QNX Port Craig Rodrigues
21:48 QNX Port Andy Olson
20:23 Re: what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean? Jeff Sturm
19:54 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Stan Shebs
17:14 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as? Brad Lucier
17:05 Re: solaris 8 x86 Alexandre Oliva
16:58 Re: Compiler Alexandre Oliva
16:54 Re: How to tell gcc that a static function is really used? Alexandre Oliva
15:49 Re: xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc Nick Clifton
15:48 Compiler Gerardo Gonzalez
15:16 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
15:04 Re: about g77 Toon Moene
15:03 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
15:02 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Toon Moene
15:02 Re: what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean? Adam Megacz
15:01 Re: POLONIA-CENTER Toon Moene
15:01 xscale-elf-gcc and arm-elf-gcc Arvind Krishnaswamy
14:59 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
14:31 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. David Edelsohn
14:26 FW: solaris 8 x86 Jesse Geddis
14:25 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as? Jakub Jelinek
14:22 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
14:21 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joe Buck
14:20 How to tell gcc that a static function is really used? H . J . Lu
14:19 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
14:15 solaris 8 x86 Jesse Geddis
14:09 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Stan Shebs
13:56 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
13:16 Re: build status for cross builds? Janis Johnson
12:43 Re: gnu assembler question Paolo Carlini
12:39 gnu assembler question Tom Crispin
12:29 successful build 3.0.3 and CVS branch Tom Crispin
12:24 Re: dwarf2out Alexandre Oliva
12:15 Re: CPP macro for Byte-order Joe Buck
12:14 dwarf2out Van Snyder
12:14 dwarf2out Van Snyder
11:58 3.1 bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu Brad Lucier
11:53 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joe Buck
11:43 Re: two constructor copies in object file Joe Buck
10:49 instantiate_virtual_regs query Daniel Towner
10:47 legitimate_address_p query Daniel Towner
10:46 Re: gcc installation Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
10:33 gcc installation Justin R. Gortner
10:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Phil Blundell
10:12 RE: two constructor copies in object file Bernard Dautrevaux
09:46 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Geoff Keating
09:34 CPP macro for Byte-order Gabriel Dos Reis
09:17 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as? Brad Lucier
08:42 Re: function inlining in ARM/Thumb Richard Earnshaw
08:19 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Paul Koning
08:08 Re: Web headers Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
08:04 Re: Web headers Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
08:03 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
07:34 Re: LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX Alexandre Oliva
07:33 ƷƣʹԼ䣡ÿռ䣬ٵʾ֣ market@todaynic.com
07:26 Re: two constructor copies in object file Alexandre Oliva
07:22 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Alexandre Oliva
07:17 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
05:24 Re: Web headers Gerald Pfeifer
03:03 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Rainer Orth
03:01 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Richard Kenner
02:58 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Richard Kenner
02:49 Re: continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as? Jakub Jelinek
01:09 RE: two constructor copies in object file Bernard Dautrevaux
00:45 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Eric Christopher
00:45 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Eric Christopher
00:18 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers

January 16, 2002
23:34 Deciding whether to put a testcase Kazu Hirata
22:12 Re: LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX snodx
21:31 Re: Problem creating shared object with gcc on AIX 4.3.3 Craig Rodrigues
21:00 Re: Problem creating shared object with gcc on AIX 4.3.3 David Edelsohn
20:23 Problem creating shared object with gcc on AIX 4.3.3 P S Suresh
20:10 constructor calling order harsha
20:02 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Tim Prince
19:20 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
19:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments mike stump
19:08 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments mike stump
19:03 about g77 wang Allen
19:01 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Jason R Thorpe
18:53 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments mike stump
18:28 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Richard Kenner
18:21 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joe Buck
18:09 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Joe Buck
17:15 success building 3.0.1 and failure with 3.0.3; and some questions Tom Crispin
16:29 two constructor copies in object file Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
16:16 Re: Web headers Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
15:27 Re: issues trying to add ColdFire v4e FPU support to gcc-20020107 Peter Barada
15:22 g++/GNU ld/position independent libraries Wheeler, Fred (CRD)
15:18 POLONIA-CENTER POLONIA-CENTER
15:18 POLONIA-CENTER POLONIA-CENTER
14:48 continuing sparcv9 odyssey---need gnu as? Brad Lucier
14:34 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Stan Shebs
14:27 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Neil Booth
14:23 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Christopher Faylor
14:17 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Jason R Thorpe
14:12 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
14:12 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Mark Mitchell
13:56 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Paul Koning
13:49 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Robert Lipe
13:28 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
13:25 Re: gcc mirror links Gerald Pfeifer
13:22 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Neil Booth
13:22 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Zack Weinberg
13:20 Script for checking copyrights in gcc tree Max Okumoto
13:15 gcc mirror links daniel heiserer
13:08 issues trying to add ColdFire v4e FPU support to gcc-20020107 Peter Barada
12:59 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Geoff Keating
12:45 Re: Web headers Gerald Pfeifer
12:40 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
12:29 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
12:19 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Zack Weinberg
12:18 Re: Fix 3272 and 5181 in the branch? (was: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?) Paolo Carlini
12:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
11:56 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Eric Christopher
11:52 Re: Fix 3272 and 5181 in the branch? (was: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?) Benjamin Kosnik
11:42 Fix 3272 and 5181 in the branch? (was: Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ?) Paolo Carlini
11:42 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
11:27 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joe Buck
11:25 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
11:18 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Mark Mitchell
11:16 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
11:14 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Craig Rodrigues
10:49 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Ulrich Weigand
10:46 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Mark Mitchell
10:44 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Mark Mitchell
10:30 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Richard Henderson
10:27 function inlining in ARM/Thumb Arvind Krishnaswamy
10:26 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Richard Henderson
10:12 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Paul Koning
10:03 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Joe Buck
09:57 $BL4$N#12/1_$X$NF;!*$"$J$?$b8\Ld$K$J$C$F:_Bp9b<}F~!*(B $B!J3t!KA4?.6(8\Ld(B
09:57 $BL4$N#12/1_$X$NF;!*$"$J$?$b8\Ld$K$J$C$F:_Bp9b<}F~!*(B $B!J3t!KA4?.6(8\Ld(B
09:52 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Joel Sherrill
09:41 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Benjamin Kosnik
09:40 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Joe Buck
09:37 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Joseph S. Myers
09:26 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Craig Rodrigues
09:25 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
09:22 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Paolo Carlini
09:15 Re: GNATS Write Access Joe Buck
09:12 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Joe Buck
09:02 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Bradley D. LaRonde
08:51 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Mark Mitchell
08:48 Re: little problems with gcc 3.0.3 Alexandre Oliva
08:47 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Christopher Faylor
08:46 Re: LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX Alexandre Oliva
08:45 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? mike stump
08:41 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem Robert Boehne
08:41 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Jan Hubicka
08:20 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Christopher Faylor
08:13 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
08:11 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? David Edelsohn
08:09 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
08:07 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Bradley D. LaRonde
08:06 Re: Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Christopher Faylor
08:04 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Paolo Carlini
08:03 Are the GCC lists intended to be open lists? Paul Koning
07:56 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? David Edelsohn
07:49 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Gabriel Dos Reis
07:49 GNATS Write Access Kazu Hirata
07:36 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Paul Koning
07:36 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Paul Koning
07:23 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions mike stump
06:08 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Ulrich Weigand
05:38 Re: .NET Managed Extensions Sinisa Milivojevic
05:27 Re: build status for cross builds? Kai Henningsen
05:26 RE: Remaining host configuration fragments Bernard Dautrevaux
03:59 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Joseph S. Myers
03:50 Re: attributes in function arguments broken Joseph S. Myers
02:58 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Gerald Pfeifer
02:35 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Jakub Jelinek
02:06 Re: arm/thumb: GOT and indirections Adrian von Bidder
02:02 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Phil Blundell
01:31 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Richard Sandiford
01:17 little problems with gcc 3.0.3 Massimiliano Cialdi
00:55 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes Schirmer, Hartmut
00:30 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Eric Christopher

January 15, 2002
23:08 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Mark Mitchell
23:07 LIST OF HEADER FILES AND FUNCTIONS AND CONSTANTS-SNODX snodx
23:05 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Mark Mitchell
22:27 arch (revision control system) Tom Lord
22:12 [3.0.3, 2.95.3] Endless loop with strstream.h included w/o instream.h linguist-gcc
21:25 Re.: Question Chirvani Abdoullaev
19:32 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes John Wehle
19:01 attributes in function arguments broken Aldy Hernandez
18:59 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes Joe Buck
17:47 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes Chris Sears
16:45 Re: .NET Managed Extensions Steven Bosscher
16:44 Re: .NET Managed Extensions Joel Sherrill
16:41 Re: .NET Managed Extensions Steven Bosscher
16:22 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
16:21 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Neil Booth
16:12 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Alexandre Oliva
16:04 Re: .NET Managed Extensions Joe Buck
15:32 Re: FORTRA N 77 SOFTWARE Toon Moene
15:29 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Joseph S. Myers
15:02 About global varibles initialization Djkerster Lameprs
14:14 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Paul Koning
14:14 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem Paul Koning
13:28 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
13:16 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes John Wehle
12:42 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Daniel Jacobowitz
12:34 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
12:26 compiled gcc andromeda
12:21 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes Chris Sears
11:49 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Richard Henderson
11:41 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Ulrich Weigand
11:29 urgent help needed: testsuite related Tony Kou
11:11 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Joseph S. Myers
11:08 Re: successfully built and installed GCC Janis Johnson
10:46 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem David Edelsohn
10:42 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Neil Booth
10:37 Re: new contribution Joel Sherrill
10:28 Re: new contribution Mark Mitchell
10:27 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem George.R.Goffe
10:27 Re: Web headers Mark Mitchell
09:49 Re: [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes John Wehle
09:40 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Zack Weinberg
09:20 successfully built and installed GCC Kurt M. Brown
09:18 .NET Managed Extensions Sinisa Milivojevic
09:17 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem Florian Krohm
09:14 Re: non coherent options, switches and descriptions Nick Clifton
08:38 Re: What to do against "X" constraints in asm statements Joe Buck
08:33 arm/thumb: GOT and indirections Adrian von Bidder
08:11 Re: gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem David Edelsohn
07:37 What to do against "X" constraints in asm statements Jakub Jelinek
03:46 gcc on AIX 4.3.3 - installation problem P S Suresh
03:41 RFC - g77 tests using dg-output Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
02:18 Re: Web headers Zack Weinberg
00:12 new contribution Amal burman

January 14, 2002
23:07 [patch] i386.c string alignment - no alignment for < 32 bytes, else to 32 bytes Chris Sears
20:13 Re: what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean? Jeff Sturm
20:07 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Timothy J. Wood
19:10 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) dewar
18:17 Re: 2nd problem Sir Ace
18:13 gcc-ss-20020114 is now available gccadmin
18:07 [ANNOUNCE] first prototype of unwind API David Mosberger
18:03 Re: 2nd problem Alexandre Oliva
17:30 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Daniel Berlin
17:26 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Daniel Berlin
17:02 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Richard Henderson
16:54 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Timothy J. Wood
16:54 what does __gthread_active_p() do/mean? Adam Megacz
16:40 Re: Have run out of space in CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Richard Henderson
16:21 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
16:15 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Richard Henderson
16:08 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
15:49 Re: Web headers Joe Buck
15:31 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Richard Henderson
15:26 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
15:12 Re: debugging dwarf2 info Zack Weinberg
14:59 Re: debugging dwarf2 info Daniel Jacobowitz
14:51 debugging dwarf2 info Per Bothner
14:11 $B$*855$$G$9$+(B sanwa
14:11 $B$*855$$G$9$+(B sanwa
13:50 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
13:38 Re: Have run out of space in CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P Jan Hubicka
13:37 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Zack Weinberg
13:36 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Jan Hubicka
13:33 Have run out of space in CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P Peter Barada
13:11 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Joe Buck
13:05 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Ulrich Weigand
13:05 Re: Web headers Zack Weinberg
13:00 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Richard Henderson
12:56 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Richard Kenner
12:56 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Richard Henderson
12:50 Re: Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Jan Hubicka
12:42 Re: ffs? Richard Henderson
11:31 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
11:22 Re: GCC online documentation Gerald Pfeifer
11:19 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) dewar
11:11 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Joe Buck
11:08 Re: rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Joseph S. Myers
11:01 rfc: __builtin_syntax_error Aldy Hernandez
10:53 Re: 2nd problem Sir Ace
10:44 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
10:33 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Daniel Berlin
10:32 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? Craig Rodrigues
10:12 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin Janis Johnson
09:51 Re: Bug in tidy_fallthru_edges ? Ulrich Weigand
09:24 Re: DWARF2-win32 and gcc/gcc/unwind-pe.h? Jakub Jelinek
09:21 DWARF2-win32 and gcc/gcc/unwind-pe.h? Adam Megacz
09:21 Re: Bug in tidy_fallthru_edges ? Alexandre Oliva
09:17 Re: 2nd problem Alexandre Oliva
08:34 Re: g++ Gerald Pfeifer
08:07 Re: Plans for 3.0.4 ? David Edelsohn
08:02 Plans for 3.0.4 ? Robert Boehne
08:02 g++ Tom Fetterer
07:56 Bug? flow_find_cross_jump deletes USE insns ... Ulrich Weigand
07:46 Bug in tidy_fallthru_edges ? Ulrich Weigand
04:12 Re: Web headers Joseph S. Myers
04:10 Re: GCC online documentation Joseph S. Myers
02:43 RE: Installation error on AIX 4.3.3 Rupert Wood
02:33 Installation error on AIX 4.3.3 P S Suresh
02:33 Installation error on AIX 4.3.3 P S Suresh
00:12 2nd problem Sir Ace

January 13, 2002
20:29 Re: binutils Craig Rodrigues
20:18 binutils Earl Healey
20:15 Re: regarding tree format. Craig Rodrigues
20:10 Re: regarding tree format. N V Krishna
18:17 Re: Web headers Russ Allbery
17:47 Web headers Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
17:38 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Christopher Faylor
17:35 GCC online documentation Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
15:44 Ich bin's schneckchen@brisant-mail.com
15:44 Ich bin's schneckchen@brisant-mail.com
14:34 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments Zack Weinberg
14:00 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage Christopher Faylor
13:55 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage Zack Weinberg
12:00 PATCH for Re: Link failure Gerald Pfeifer
08:44 FORTRA N 77 SOFTWARE Sudam Roy
06:48 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Joseph S. Myers
03:29 Link failure Ian H Thain
01:04 regarding tree format. rashmi kankaria

January 12, 2002
20:14 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Daniel Berlin
16:39 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum ... Andrew Cagney
15:15 I got the address you asked me David Imbeault
12:05 Re: Successful build report Janis Johnson
10:16 Re: spam mail Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
10:03 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Andreas Schwab
07:49 Re: gcov and C++'s global destructors Sven C. Koehler
07:39 Re: makefiles in gcc Joseph S. Myers
07:20 bootstarp and cpp ratnadeep joshi
07:15 makefiles in gcc ratnadeep joshi
07:02
06:34 Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin Rani Sharoni
06:27 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Roman Zippel
06:13 Parts recycledparts@lycos.co.uk
06:13 Parts recycledparts@lycos.co.uk
05:38 RedHat Robin Sonefors
04:08 Re: GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Joseph S. Myers
03:31 GNU GNATS 4.0 beta1 released (fwd) Gerald Pfeifer
02:07 Re: Successful: gcc 3.0.3 on SuSE 7.1 Janis Johnson

January 11, 2002
21:09 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage Christopher Faylor
19:38 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Craig Rodrigues
18:03 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question Richard Henderson
17:57 Re: NDEBUG Alexandre Oliva
16:43 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question Tom Crispin
16:35 Re: libtool in binutils question Zack Weinberg
16:24 Re: libtool in binutils question Maciej W. Rozycki
16:15 NDEBUG David Rasmussen
15:38 Re: libtool in binutils question Ian Lance Taylor
15:35 Re: libtool in binutils question Steve Ellcey
14:57 Re: libtool in binutils question Maciej W. Rozycki
13:54 Re: libtool in binutils question Alexandre Oliva
13:53 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question Richard Henderson
13:43 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question Tom Crispin
10:43 Re: mailing list question. Christopher Faylor
10:37 Re: SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project Laurent Guerby
10:27 Re: SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project Joe Buck
10:24 Re: Status of SSE/SSE2 builtins on ia32 Richard Henderson
10:21 Re: x86 optimization and rtx_cost question Richard Henderson
10:09 Re: gcov and C++'s global destructors Janis Johnson
10:08 Re: possible problem in i386.h? Richard Henderson
10:02 Re: gcov and C++'s global destructors Joe Buck
09:53 Re: mailing list question. Joe Buck
09:13 Re: A blast from the past law
09:04 x86 optimization and rtx_cost question Tom Crispin
06:06 Millions of Movies and Pictures? I know how... Sandra Manton
06:05 Latest update on Bugzilla Daniel Berlin
05:53 Re: SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project Joseph S. Myers
05:43 mailing list question. cesar tejeda
05:31 Re: eon performance regression Jason Merrill
05:17 Alternative to named return value extension is worse. cesar tejeda
05:08 gcov and C++'s global destructors Sven C. Koehler
04:37 gcc for inter 196 microcontroller Kirill Ratkin
04:30 Successful build report tomas szepe
04:23 Re: eon performance regression Jan Hubicka
04:17 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Richard Kenner
04:13 Re: A blast from the past Richard Kenner
04:10 Re: eon performance regression Jason Merrill
04:09 Re: Difficulty building stage 1 MIPS cross compiler from CVS... Bo Thorsen
04:09 SPEC 2004 submission and GCC project Laurent Guerby
02:11 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon? Richard Henderson
02:10 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon? Richard Henderson
01:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Horst von Brand
01:45 Order of docs for target options Joseph S. Myers
01:36 two compiler versions Philipp Schieferdecker
00:30 Re: Difficulty building stage 1 MIPS cross compiler from CVS... Eric Christopher

January 10, 2002
23:36 RE: NON_OPTIMAL CODE GENERATED FOR SH4 Naveen Sharma
23:27 NON_OPTIMAL CODE GENERATED FOR SH4 naveens
22:57 Re: possible problem in i386.h? Andreas Jaeger
22:39 GCC Porting beginner Osman Bineev
22:36 Re: possible problem in i386.h? Brad Lucier
22:29 Re: possible problem in i386.h? Andreas Jaeger
21:51 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Fergus Henderson
21:07 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon? Brad Lucier
20:55 Re: Status of SSE/SSE2 builtins on ia32 Graham Stott
20:52 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon? Tim Prince
20:25 Re: Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon? Tim Prince
18:42 PPC405 libstdc++ cross-compile fails w/ 3.0.3 Bryan Rittmeyer
18:41 Difficulty building stage 1 MIPS cross compiler from CVS... Steven J. Hill
17:52 possible problem in i386.h? lucier
17:33 Successful: gcc 3.0.3 on SuSE 7.1 Yang Wang
16:10 Re: Bitset statistics Michael Hayes
15:48 Re: Please don't sent threatening legalese to the gcc list (was Re: ia64) dewar
15:41 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
15:39 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Zack Weinberg
15:38 Best options for 64-bit FP on athlon? Brad Lucier
15:25 Please don't sent threatening legalese to the gcc list (was Re: ia64) Joe Buck
15:25 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Richard Henderson
15:10 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
15:04 spam mail Paul Cockayne
14:50 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4 Loren James Rittle
14:41 Re: Remaining host configuration fragments DJ Delorie
14:26 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage Zack Weinberg
14:20 Re: [RFA] Major debugging breakage Neil Booth
14:16 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4 Loren James Rittle
14:08 [RFA] Major debugging breakage Christopher Faylor
13:59 Remaining host configuration fragments Zack Weinberg
13:36 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Richard Henderson
13:00 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
12:58 Re: ia64 Alexandre Oliva
12:57 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
12:54 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Richard Henderson
12:49 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
12:42 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
12:28 Re: sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=... Jeff Sturm
12:16 Re: cos? akbara
12:11 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tim Hollebeek
11:39 cos? Roger P
11:37 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Linus Torvalds
11:37 Re: export for Templates Joe Buck
11:28 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Richard Henderson
11:13 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
10:52 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
10:24 Re: sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=... Brad Lucier
10:13 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Geoff Keating
09:03 Re: pre compiled headers Aldy Hernandez
09:03 Re: CSE optimization question Steve Ellcey
08:33 type casting N V Krishna
07:51 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers David Edelsohn
07:30 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Peter Barada
07:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
07:15 Re: va_arg question Franz Sirl
06:52 Re: CSE optimization question Daniel Berlin
06:44 va_arg question mgowan
06:39 Re: CSE optimization question law
06:37 PATCH for Re: page http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html Gerald Pfeifer
06:32 Re: CSE optimization question Jan Hubicka
05:55 Status of SSE/SSE2 builtins on ia32 Andreas Jaeger
05:05 Re: CSE optimization question Daniel Berlin
04:59 Re: CSE optimization question Richard Kenner
04:53 Re: Bitset statistics Daniel Berlin
04:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Erik Trulsson
04:19 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
04:05 Bitset statistics Michael Hayes
03:03 ia64 Raghavendra M
02:45 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Richard Earnshaw
02:44 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernd Petrovitsch
02:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix David Weinehall
02:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Matthias Benkmann
01:13 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux

January 09, 2002
22:12 pre compiled headers harsha
20:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
20:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tim Hollebeek
18:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Fergus Henderson
17:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:00 Re: CSE optimization question law
16:51 CSE optimization question Steve Ellcey
16:35 Re: __builtin_prefetch Richard Henderson
16:19 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Peter Barada
15:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix J.A. Magallon
15:44 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
15:33 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Geoff Keating
14:35 __builtin_prefetch Paul Koning
14:24 Re: [G95-develop] Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE) Richard Henderson
14:11 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Alexandre Oliva
14:00 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Grard Roudier
13:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
13:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Koning
13:39 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
13:29 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc dewar
13:29 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc dewar
13:22 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
13:08 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
13:06 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
12:58 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
12:55 Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE) Steven Bosscher
12:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
12:45 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
12:44 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
12:42 Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE) Steven Bosscher
12:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
12:31 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Richard Henderson
12:28 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
12:23 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
12:23 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joe Buck
12:20 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Richard Henderson
12:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Koning
12:08 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
11:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
11:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Grard Roudier
11:30 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Geoff Keating
11:04 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
10:53 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Hartmut Schirmer
10:22 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc dewar
10:09 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Dale Johannesen
10:09 Re: egcs/gcc ChangeLog Makefile.in config.in confi ... Zack Weinberg
10:05 Re: GCC, g++ entries in Free Software Directory Joe Buck
08:57 Re: Successful build on Ultrix 4.4 mips ECOFF Janis Johnson
08:55 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin Janis Johnson
08:41 export for Templates Ken Watson
08:18 multilib issues Adrian von Bidder
08:17 Successful build on Ultrix 4.4 mips ECOFF Bert De Knuydt
08:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
07:46 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Koning
06:59 Re: build status for cross builds? Bo Thorsen
06:44 Re: cross compilers without binutils Andreas Schwab
06:16 Re: egcs/gcc ChangeLog Makefile.in config.in confi ... Bo Thorsen
05:15 page http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html Hugues Leroy
04:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Rod Chapman
04:07 GCC, g++ entries in Free Software Directory Gerald Pfeifer
03:56 Re: gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link Gerald Pfeifer
03:14 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Joseph S. Myers
03:09 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Richard Earnshaw
03:06 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Gabriel Dos Reis
03:03 Successful build of gcc-3.0.3 on i686-pc-cygwin Prof. A Olowofoyeku (The Afric
02:59 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Richard Henderson
02:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Gabriel Dos Reis
02:57 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Richard Earnshaw
02:51 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
02:48 ARM: handling of weak symbols in thumb code Adrian von Bidder
02:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
02:40 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
01:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Fergus Henderson
01:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernd Petrovitsch
01:15 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux

January 08, 2002
22:56 cross compilers without binutils Danish Samad
22:32 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Andreas Jaeger
21:14 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Fergus Henderson
20:29 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4 Loren James Rittle
19:57 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
19:17 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Fergus Henderson
19:11 Re: Simple question. Sir Ace
18:55 Need Forms steve b
18:47 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc dewar
18:36 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Dale Johannesen
18:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
18:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
18:08 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc dewar
17:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
17:39 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Dale Johannesen
17:19 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:49 Re: "make distclean"... mike stump
16:48 Re: rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:45 Re: Symbol table lookup at the run time Pavel Roskin
16:23 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc dewar
16:05 Re: Symbol table lookup at the run time Zack Weinberg
16:04 Re: sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=... Jeff Sturm
16:04 rfc: clobber all call-saved registers Richard Henderson
15:31 Symbol table lookup at the run time Pavel Roskin
15:12 Re: Defined but unused target macros Zack Weinberg
14:39 WCHAR_UNSIGNED Joseph S. Myers
14:07 RE: program compiled with GCC Stephano Mariani
12:41 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc Joseph S. Myers
12:41 Re: gcc3 vs 176.gcc David Edelsohn
12:22 gcc3 vs 176.gcc Dale Johannesen
11:29 Re: ambiguous insn in altivec Daniel Berlin
11:09 "make distclean"... Zack Weinberg
11:07 Re: ambiguous insn in altivec David Edelsohn
11:04 ambiguous insn in altivec Aldy Hernandez
10:47 variables and stack space question Hudak, Tyler
10:27 Re: Simple question. M. R. Brown
10:11 Defined but unused target macros Joseph S. Myers
09:20 Take mirror: ftp.fh-worms.de Steffen Rohr
07:46 x86-64 branch created Andreas Jaeger
07:34 Re: program compiled with GCC Adrian von Bidder
07:27 program compiled with GCC Nuotio Mikko
07:07 Re: c++ code completion status report Gregor Zeitlinger
06:03 Re: gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link Joseph S. Myers
04:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
04:52 Re: gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link Gerald Pfeifer
04:50 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2 Alexandre Oliva
04:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
03:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix 'jtv'
03:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
03:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
03:22 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
03:21 Checking for errors on stdout/stderr Joseph S. Myers
03:03 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4 Gerald Pfeifer
01:54 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux

January 07, 2002
21:49 non coherent options, switches and descriptions jg
21:26 Can't size warning Vijay Velusamy
20:39 gcc-ss-20020107 is now available gccadmin
18:45 sparc "environments" versus -mcpu=... lucier
17:13 AMAZING NEW YEAR SPECIALS! TonerPlus Specials
17:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
16:29 Re: Unused but documented target macros mike stump
16:23 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix J.A. Magallon
16:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
16:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
16:11 Efficient gmon call-arc counting Greg McGary
15:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
15:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Geoff Keating
15:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
15:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Geoff Keating
15:34 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
15:24 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi Joseph S. Myers
15:21 Re: Unused but documented target macros Stan Shebs
15:20 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
15:17 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2 Jeff Sturm
15:15 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
15:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
15:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
15:11 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
15:10 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi Joseph S. Myers
15:08 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi Stan Shebs
15:07 Unused but documented target macros Joseph S. Myers
15:05 RE: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR James Mansion
14:57 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
14:52 Re: Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi Richard Henderson
14:41 Documentation for target macros: comments vs. tm.texi Joseph S. Myers
14:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
14:26 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tim McDaniel
14:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
14:16 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2 Nirmit Vikrambhai Desai
14:12 RE: gcj on Cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:09 Re: Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2 Jeff Sturm
14:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tim Hollebeek
13:54 Migrating from gcc2.96 to gcc 3.0.2 Nirmit Vikrambhai Desai
13:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
13:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Theodore Tso
12:44 gcc 3.0.3 website : broken link pi
11:58 libcall CSE, simplify_unary_operation, and (zero_extend (const_int)) Ulrich Weigand
11:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
11:26 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
11:20 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
11:12 Re: Scheduling of asm() mike stump
10:52 Re: Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4 Joe Buck
10:39 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
10:36 Re: Scheduling of asm() Richard Henderson
10:03 Re: Successful build on apple darwin5.2 Aldy Hernandez
10:00 Re: Scheduling of asm() mike stump
09:51 Re: Successful build on apple darwin5.2 Janis Johnson
09:47 Re: Successful build on Tru64, 4.0f Janis Johnson
09:45 Re: gcc-3.0.3 install Janis Johnson
09:43 Re: Successful build on HPUX 11.00 Janis Johnson
09:06 Re: Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE) Diego Novillo
08:56 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
08:52 www.geocities.com/airotaxi/a.html kathy
08:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
08:37 Re: long double (128-bit) support law
08:28 long double (128-bit) support Rayson Ho
08:12 Successful build on Tru64, 4.0f Bert De Knuydt
07:57 gcc-3.0.3 install Chris Sontag
07:36 Re: gcj on Cygwin Jeff Sturm
06:54 Successful build on HPUX 11.00 Bert De Knuydt
06:39 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR law
06:11 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
05:48 port to 80251 processor Alex Sandro Garzo
05:37 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
05:34 Re: Is there a Problem with -g on mainline (470MB for a 7MB executable)? Martin Kahlert
05:33 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
05:32 Re: Is there a Problem with -g on mainline (470MB for a 7MB executable)? Jakub Jelinek
05:30 RE: Help wanted on GCC port Rupert Wood
05:26 Is there a Problem with -g on mainline (470MB for a 7MB executable)? Martin Kahlert
05:05 Help wanted on GCC port Anoop
03:17 Successful installation of GCC 3.0.3 on i386-unknown-freebsd4.4 Gerald Pfeifer
02:58 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joseph S. Myers
01:45 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Fergus Henderson
00:44 Error building cross compiler from mainline Timothy J. Wood
00:19 gcj on Cygwin Eugen Rotariu
00:11 Random C testsuite failures for gcc-3_0-branch (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Andris Pavenis
00:06 Random C testsuite failures for gcc-3_0-branch (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Andris Pavenis

January 06, 2002
23:23 Re: Problems with c++ (gcc 2.95.3) on Sys V R4.0 Detlef Scholz
21:35 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
20:59 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
20:26 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
20:10 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
20:04 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Alexandre Oliva
19:22 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
18:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
17:51 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Alexandre Oliva
17:50 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
17:48 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Alexandre Oliva
17:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
17:20 Re: Scheduling of asm() Richard Henderson
16:57 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
16:50 Re: Scheduling of asm() Falk Hueffner
16:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Dennis Ferguson
16:24 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
16:17 Re: Scheduling of asm() Richard Henderson
16:10 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
15:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
15:19 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR law
14:49 Re: Scheduling of asm() Falk Hueffner
14:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Jakub Jelinek
14:14 RE: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR S. Bosscher
14:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
14:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
13:54 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 successful build of 3.0.3; libjava test problem Alexandre Oliva
13:48 Re: problem installation with zlib Alexandre Oliva
13:45 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Alexandre Oliva
13:38 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Alexandre Oliva
13:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
13:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
13:06 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com) Alexandre Oliva
12:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Gabriel Dos Reis
12:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
12:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joseph S. Myers
12:04 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu Jakub Jelinek
12:02 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu Stan Shebs
11:57 Re: Report of successful build Janis Johnson
11:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
11:35 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com) Gerald Pfeifer
11:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alan Cox
11:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
11:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
11:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
11:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Laurent Guerby
10:54 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu H . J . Lu
10:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
10:33 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu Stan Shebs
10:30 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu Stan Shebs
10:27 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu H . J . Lu
10:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
10:22 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu Stan Shebs
10:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
10:08 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu H . J . Lu
10:01 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
09:49 Re: FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu H . J . Lu
09:42 FYI: large number of objc failures on i686-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
09:34 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com) Alexandre Oliva
08:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Gabriel Dos Reis
08:39 Re: build status for cross builds? Paul Koning
08:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alan Cox
08:27 Re: gcc question Jeff Sturm
08:25 Re: gcc question dewar
08:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
07:58 Re: DW_OP_addr with undefined label Andreas Schwab
07:57 PATCH for Re: Mailing list usage Gerald Pfeifer
07:06 gcc question steven blakeslee
05:55 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Laurent Guerby
05:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
05:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Laurent Guerby
05:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
05:23 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Gabriel Dos Reis
05:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
05:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
05:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
03:55 Re: build status for cross builds? Gerald Pfeifer
03:11 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
03:09 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
00:46 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
00:03 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer

January 05, 2002
23:57 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
23:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
23:24 Successful build on apple darwin5.2 Aldy Hernandez
23:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
22:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
21:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
21:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
20:58 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Albert D. Cahalan
20:56 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
20:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
20:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
20:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
20:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
20:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
20:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
20:08 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
19:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
19:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
19:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
19:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
19:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
17:48 Re: build status for cross builds? mike stump
17:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Gabriel Dos Reis
17:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
16:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix mike stump
16:02 Re: build status for cross builds? mike stump
15:59 Re: build status for cross builds? mike stump
15:50 Re: Scheduling of asm() mike stump
14:51 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:59 Re: GCC 3.0.3 build for Alpha, i486, PowerPC (SuSE RPMs available) Janis Johnson
13:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joseph S. Myers
13:18 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Andreas Jaeger
13:17 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Joseph S. Myers
12:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
12:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
12:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jkl
12:08 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Andrew Cagney
12:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jkl
12:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
11:53 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
11:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
11:46 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
11:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joseph S. Myers
11:31 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Daniel Berlin
11:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jkl
11:26 Re: Scheduling of asm() Richard Henderson
11:20 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Daniel Berlin
11:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
10:58 Re: Scheduling of asm() Paul Koning
10:54 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Joseph S. Myers
10:50 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
10:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
10:45 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Craig Rodrigues
10:41 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
10:37 Re: build status for cross builds? Krister Walfridsson
10:22 Re: Retiring gccbug script? law
10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Kai Henningsen
10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Kai Henningsen
10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Kai Henningsen
10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Kai Henningsen
10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Kai Henningsen
10:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Kai Henningsen
10:04 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Joseph S. Myers
09:56 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Dennis Ferguson
09:56 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Andrew Cagney
09:22 Re: build status for cross builds? Paul Koning
09:21 May an implementation document implementation-defined behavior as undefined? (fwd) zackw
09:17 problem installation with zlib root
08:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix John Marshall
08:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Koning
08:25 Re: Scheduling of asm() Paul Koning
08:18 Re: Scheduling of asm() Paul Koning
07:27 Re: passwords for exceptions.pdf Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
06:54 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Carlo Wood
05:37 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com Gerald Pfeifer
05:30 Re: Revised clarifications for patch-testing instructions Gerald Pfeifer
04:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
04:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
04:22 Meilleurs Vux pour 2002 : anne de mmoire, de mobilisation, d'action, de justice et de srnit - Appel au soutien moral et financier Habib HAIBI
04:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
04:00 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joseph S. Myers
03:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
03:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
03:51 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
03:30 Re: Arraysizes in g77 Toon Moene
03:23 Re: Arraysizes in g77 Toon Moene
02:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Geoff Keating
01:38 Re: Retiring gccbug script? Joseph S. Myers

January 04, 2002
21:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
20:38 Retiring gccbug script? Craig Rodrigues
20:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Russ Allbery
20:18 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
19:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
19:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Robert Lipe
19:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
19:31 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Roman Zippel
19:09 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
19:08 Re: Old libstdc++-2.7.2 Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
18:57 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
18:56 Re: build status for cross builds? mike stump
18:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
18:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
18:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
18:36 Re: build status for cross builds? mike stump
18:08 Remind Your Customers Christine Kervus
18:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
17:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:22 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
17:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
17:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
17:03 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
16:59 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
16:57 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:55 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
16:47 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
16:45 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
16:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
16:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
16:24 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:21 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
16:10 Re: Scheduling of asm() Falk Hueffner
16:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
16:05 Vectorising pass (was: Re: SIMPLE) Steven Bosscher
16:04 Re: Successful build on Solaris 2.6 Janis Johnson
15:53 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
15:48 Re: build status for cross builds? Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
15:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
15:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
15:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
15:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
15:17 Re: build status for cross builds? dewar
15:17 Re: Scheduling of asm() Richard Henderson
15:15 Re: Scheduling of asm() Richard Henderson
15:07 Re: Scheduling of asm() Jakub Jelinek
15:05 Re: Scheduling of asm() dewar
15:03 Re: build status for cross builds? Paul Koning
14:56 Re: build status for cross builds? dewar
14:56 Re: Scheduling of asm() Paul Koning
14:53 Re: build status for cross builds? Paul Koning
14:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
14:49 Scheduling of asm() Falk Hueffner
14:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
14:38 Re: build status for cross builds? dewar
14:38 Re: build status for cross builds? Joseph S. Myers
14:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
14:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
14:26 Re: build status for cross builds? Paul Koning
14:24 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
14:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
14:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
14:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
14:13 Old libstdc++-2.7.2 Ulrich Staerk
14:06 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
14:04 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com Phil Edwards
14:04 Re: build status for cross builds? Joe Buck
14:04 Re: C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings Gerald Pfeifer
14:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
14:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joseph S. Myers
13:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
13:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
13:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Linus Torvalds
13:28 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231 Peter Barada
13:23 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Andreas Tobler
13:10 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231 Tom Crispin
12:45 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com) law
12:21 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com) Joseph S. Myers
12:13 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231 Peter Barada
11:41 Re: Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com) Gerald Pfeifer
11:34 Re: Bug in gcc-20011231 Peter Barada
11:16 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com Gerald Pfeifer
11:09 re: Bug in gcc-20011231 Tom Crispin
11:08 Mirror sites (was: anoncvs.cygnus.com) Gerald Pfeifer
10:55 Re: Bounds checker for g++ on Linux? Greg McGary
10:40 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Tom Tromey
09:46 Re: Major debugging breakage Christopher Faylor
09:34 Successful build on Solaris 2.6 Bert De Knuydt
09:32 Re: build status for cross builds? Paul Koning
09:20 Re: anoncvs.cygnus.com Joe Buck
09:10 Re: successful build and installation GCC 3.0.3 Janis Johnson
09:09 Re: Successfully built and installed GCC Janis Johnson
09:09 Re: Successful build on IRIX 6.5.13m Janis Johnson
09:08 Re: 3.0.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Janis Johnson
08:52 Re: build status for cross builds? Joe Buck
08:26 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Tom Tromey
08:06 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Jeff Sturm
08:01 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Peter Barada
07:23 Re: C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings Jakub Jelinek
07:16 Re: C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings Paolo Carlini
07:08 C++/libstdc++: new "statement with no effect" warnings Gerald Pfeifer
07:02 successful build and installation GCC 3.0.3 Bob Donat
05:33 Successfully built and installed GCC John Ogness
04:16 Cross compiler problem Rauf hassan
04:15 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
04:14 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
03:40 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joseph S. Myers
03:31 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joseph S. Myers
03:28 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joseph S. Myers
03:03 Successful build on IRIX 6.5.13m Bert De Knuydt
02:14 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Andreas Tobler
02:14 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Andreas Tobler
02:14 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Andreas Tobler
01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
01:07 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
00:43 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
00:02 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Pavel Machek

January 03, 2002
23:17 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Martin Kahlert
23:14 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. H . J . Lu
22:20 Re: build status for cross builds? mike stump
21:19 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Richard Henderson
20:45 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
20:43 Re: 3.0.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jeff Sturm
20:23 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Craig Rodrigues
19:51 Re: Major debugging breakage Zack Weinberg
19:51 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
19:44 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Tom Tromey
19:43 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Colin Howell
19:37 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Tom Tromey
19:28 Re: Major debugging breakage law
19:25 anoncvs.cygnus.com law
19:22 Re: Major debugging breakage law
19:02 Re: Major debugging breakage law
19:00 Re: Major debugging breakage Trent Nelson
18:28 3.0.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Bill Clarke
18:16 Re: SIMPLE Diego Novillo
17:52 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Richard Henderson
17:29 Loop question Dale Johannesen
17:25 Re: Major debugging breakage Christopher Faylor
17:20 Re: successful 3.0.3 bootstrap on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
17:18 Re: build status for cross builds? Joe Buck
17:18 Re: m68k problem and libstdc++ Dale Johannesen
17:04 successful 3.0.3 bootstrap on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu Steve Christiansen
16:54 m68k problem and libstdc++ Craig Rodrigues
16:37 build status for cross builds? Janis Johnson
16:27 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 successful build of 3.0.3; libjava test problem Janis Johnson
16:19 Re: ChangeLog rotation law
16:08 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Gcc k6 testing account
16:05 sparc-sun-solaris2.7 successful build of 3.0.3; libjava test problem Joe Buck
15:49 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
15:48 Re: ChangeLog rotation Neil Booth
15:45 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. Eric Christopher
15:30 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
15:25 SIMPLE Steven Bosscher
15:24 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Gcc k6 testing account
15:22 Re: ChangeLog rotation David Edelsohn
15:13 Re: Major debugging breakage law
15:13 Re: ChangeLog rotation David Edelsohn
15:12 Re: Ada exception traceback dewar
15:11 ChangeLog rotation Neil Booth
15:09 Re: Ada exception traceback Florian Weimer
15:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Florian Weimer
15:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Florian Weimer
15:08 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Florian Weimer
15:08 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Gcc k6 testing account
15:01 Re: Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
14:52 Re: Major debugging breakage Neil Booth
14:41 Re: Major debugging breakage law
14:40 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Andreas Tobler
14:27 Re: Major debugging breakage Neil Booth
14:20 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tim Hollebeek
14:09 Re: Major debugging breakage Neil Booth
14:05 Re: Major debugging breakage law
14:04 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Craig Rodrigues
14:02 Re: Major debugging breakage law
13:38 Re: Major debugging breakage Geoff Keating
13:30 Re: Major debugging breakage Neil Booth
13:27 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Geoff Keating
13:25 GCC 3.0.3 build for Alpha, i486, PowerPC (SuSE RPMs available) Andreas Jaeger
13:19 Re: fastjar build failure on darwin Andreas Tobler
13:17 Re: Major debugging breakage Richard Henderson
13:08 Succesfull build and install of gcc-3.0.3 on k6-redhat-linux-gnu Gcc k6 testing account
13:05 Re: Major debugging breakage law
12:59 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
12:49 gcc build for AVR John Eigelaar
12:44 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
12:43 Re: Major debugging breakage Neil Booth
12:41 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
12:36 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Geoff Keating
12:34 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted Tom Tromey
12:33 fastjar build failure on darwin Andreas Tobler
12:32 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Andreas Jaeger
12:27 Major debugging breakage law
12:21 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Peter Barada
12:17 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available David Edelsohn
12:09 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Craig Rodrigues
12:09 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Peter Barada
12:06 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. H . J . Lu
12:04 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available David Edelsohn
12:03 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. Jan Hubicka
11:58 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted DJ Delorie
11:58 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Peter Barada
11:47 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted Zack Weinberg
11:29 A blast from the past law
11:28 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted Phil Edwards
11:13 Re: autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted DJ Delorie
10:46 Re: Simple question. Alexandre Oliva
10:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alexandre Oliva
10:44 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Alexandre Oliva
10:38 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Dale Johannesen
10:31 Re: Problems with c++ (gcc 2.95.3) on Sys V R4.0 Joe Buck
10:29 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Paul Koning
10:12 Bug in gcc-20011231 Peter Barada
10:11 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
09:49 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. H . J . Lu
09:44 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
08:49 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. H . J . Lu
08:07 Re: gcc 3.0.3 seems to build libstdc++.so.3.0.2 David Edelsohn
07:59 Problems with c++ (gcc 2.95.3) on Sys V R4.0 Detlef Scholz
07:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
06:59 passwords for exceptions.pdf Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
05:47 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. Jan Hubicka
05:40 Re: vortex peak performance regression Jan Hubicka
05:28 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
05:22 autoconfiscating top level directory -- info wanted Nathanael Nerode
05:21 Re: Simple question. Sergey Ostrovsky
05:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Lars Brinkhoff
04:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
04:00 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Lars Brinkhoff
03:13 RE: problems building cross compilers Rupert Wood
02:56 problems building cross compilers Danish Samad
02:50 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
02:44 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
02:32 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Alex Zhukov
02:13 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
02:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
02:05 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Geert Uytterhoeven
01:44 gcc 3.0.3 success on slackware Mr Adam Cioccarelli
00:33 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson

January 02, 2002
22:31 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix law
22:30 gcc 3.0.3 seems to build libstdc++.so.3.0.2 Andreas Jaeger
22:19 Solving the in-source build problem. Permanently. Phil Edwards
22:01 gcc-prs archives recognize attachments? Craig Rodrigues
20:56 Re: DWARF broken? Carlo Wood
20:54 Re: Report of successful build Janis Johnson
20:42 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Phil Edwards
20:39 Re: DWARF broken? Robert Lipe
20:32 Re: C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
20:12 Re: C undefined behavior fix Cameron Simpson
19:28 Re: Project proposal Phil Edwards
19:18 Re: Project proposal Craig Rodrigues
19:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
19:08 Re: The gnu linker. mike stump
18:52 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
18:38 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
18:37 Re: Simple question. Sir Ace
18:35 The gnu linker. Craig W. Wright
18:22 Re: Project proposal Benjamin Scherrey
17:55 Re: vortex peak performance regression Zoltan Hidvegi
17:34 Re: Simple question. Sir Ace
17:30 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Geoff Keating
17:26 Re: Simple question. mike stump
17:17 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
17:13 Re: DWARF broken? mike stump
17:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
17:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Toon Moene
17:04 Re: Your change breaks MIPS. H . J . Lu
17:04 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
16:49 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:42 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joseph S. Myers
16:36 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
16:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
16:29 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
16:20 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
16:19 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
16:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
16:15 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Alan Cox
16:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
16:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
16:08 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
16:05 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Toon Moene
16:01 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
15:59 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
15:56 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR dewar
15:55 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix dewar
15:50 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR dewar
15:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
15:44 Re: Simple question. Craig Rodrigues
15:42 Re: Simple question. Carlo Wood
15:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
15:37 Ada exception traceback Guillaume
15:35 Re: DWARF broken? Carlo Wood
15:34 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
15:28 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
15:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
15:26 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
15:24 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Toon Moene
15:23 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Per Bothner
15:21 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Tom Tromey
15:16 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
15:16 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
15:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
15:16 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Mackerras
15:14 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
15:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
15:09 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Toon Moene
15:09 Re: Report of successful build Toon Moene
15:07 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
15:06 Simple question. Sir Ace
15:01 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
15:00 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix David Woodhouse
15:00 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
14:52 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
14:51 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Per Bothner
14:50 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
14:45 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
14:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
14:36 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
14:27 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
14:26 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
14:25 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix David Woodhouse
14:23 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix jtv
14:19 Re: Why are we overusing the preprocessor? Phil Edwards
14:06 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
14:05 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Per Bothner
14:02 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
13:57 Re: gcc-ss-20011231 is now available Peter Barada
13:40 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Richard Henderson
13:37 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Richard Henderson
13:34 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Tom Tromey
13:16 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
13:07 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
12:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
12:22 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joe Buck
12:18 Re: Please update config.guess for Linux/mips. Andrew Cagney
12:13 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joe Buck
11:25 Re: DWARF broken? Jeff Sturm
11:09 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
10:42 Re: SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Joseph S. Myers
10:42 DWARF broken? Carlo Wood
10:30 SIMPLE: A language-independent tree IR Diego Novillo
10:29 Re: eon performance regression Jason Merrill
10:14 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Jeff Sturm
09:58 Re: Report of successful build Bradley D. LaRonde
09:53 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Craig Rodrigues
09:30 Re: gcc 3.0.3 in HP-UX 11.11: success report Janis Johnson
09:28 Re: Report of successful build Janis Johnson
09:07 Re: Report of successful build Joe Buck
08:58 exception support in gcc-3.0.3 Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
08:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Paul Koning
08:36 Re: No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Alexandre Oliva
07:58 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h Tom Tromey
07:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
07:48 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Jakub Jelinek
07:39 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
07:24 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h Andreas Tobler
07:02 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
07:00 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h Tom Tromey
06:58 No bootstrap on Solaris 2.7 Martin Kahlert
06:56 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Joseph S. Myers
06:49 gcc 3.0.3 in HP-UX 11.11: success report Tapani Tarvainen
06:13 Re: Jason's calls.c patch and spec2000 performance regression Jason Merrill
05:26 Jason's calls.c patch and spec2000 performance regression Jan Hubicka
05:12 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Jakub Jelinek
04:14 Hello Old Friend
04:06 Hello Old Friend
04:05 vortex peak performance regression Jan Hubicka
02:42 Re: Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h Andreas Tobler
02:42 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
02:32 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Florian Weimer
02:10 RE: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Bernard Dautrevaux
00:30 Re: Project proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
00:10 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Wolfgang Bangerth

January 01, 2002
22:54 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
21:00 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
20:58 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
20:30 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin Russ Allbery
19:57 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Jeff Sturm
19:29 Your patch to libjava/java/lang/ieeefp.h Andrew Pinski
18:09 Re: Project proposal Benjamin Scherrey
17:24 Re: Project proposal Carlo Wood
16:59 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. David Edelsohn
16:44 Re: Project proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
16:33 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
16:21 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
16:08 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Richard Henderson
15:44 Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Tom Rini
15:33 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
15:29 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
15:26 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Richard Henderson
15:03 [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Momchil Velikov
14:56 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
14:50 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Jakub Jelinek
14:49 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Alexandre Oliva
14:38 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
14:37 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Daniel Berlin
14:19 Re: [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Andreas Jaeger
14:03 Re: discussion group Craig Rodrigues
13:47 discussion group Chanakya Koppolu
13:14 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Joseph S. Myers
13:02 Re: "GNU" and Ada Geert Bosch
12:53 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin Zack Weinberg
12:36 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin Christopher Faylor
12:18 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin Zack Weinberg
12:04 [Part of] your Dec., 4th change to libf2c/Makefile.in. Toon Moene
11:40 Re: Report of successful build Toon Moene
11:39 Re: "GNU" and Ada Florian Weimer
11:31 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Zack Weinberg
11:29 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin Florian Weimer
11:21 Re: cp/decl.c Zack Weinberg
11:12 Re: bugs fixed in 3.0.3 -- second draft Zack Weinberg
11:11 Re: MMAP issue on cygwin Zack Weinberg
11:04 Re: Severity and Priority in the GNATS database Joseph S. Myers
11:01 Re: Update on bugzilla stuff Joseph S. Myers
10:11 Re: "GNU" and Ada dewar
10:01 Re: libjava build failure sol2.6 asm problem? Jeff Sturm
10:00 Severity and Priority in the GNATS database Jeffrey Turner
10:00 Re: "GNU" and Ada Alexandre Oliva
09:55 Project proposal Jeffrey Turner
08:49 Why are we overusing the preprocessor? Jeffrey Turner
06:35 Re: libjava build failure sol2.6 asm problem? Jeff Sturm
02:24 Re: GCC 3.1 problem with autoconf's configure scripts. Andreas Jaeger


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.1