This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: IA32 bootstrap error


    GCC will still work with older versions of binutils, and I agree
    that GCC should continue to at least bootstrap with them.

    GDB is a slightly different issue, in that it is not required to
    bootstrap.  For instance, I do not think we should work around bugs
    in older versions of GDB.

I don't see the distinction you are making.  For most users, if you can't
debug code produced by GCC, it's just as bad as if you can't *assemble* it.

    Essentially, I think that's what the dwarf2 issue you are experiencing
    is -- a failure to implement the entire dwarf2 spec.

Agreed.  The issue is whether we should work around GDB problems just
like we do binutils problems.  I think we clearly should.

    And as for the specific question at hand, "Should we have switched to
    default to dwarf2 for elf," 

That's not the issue I see.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]