This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Your change breaks MIPS.


On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:23:03AM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:58:51PM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 13:12, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > Have you seen
> > > 
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-12/msg00726.html
> > > 
> > > The last working one for me is
> > > 
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2001-12/msg00292.html
> > > 
> > > Any ideas?
> > > 
> > 
> 
> I have verified that I can bootstrap the CVS on Dec 17 09:00 PST 2001,
> but Dec 17 10:00 PST 2001 fails on mips. I got
> 
> alias.o differs
...
> 
> The only relevant changes are
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01900.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01658.html
> 
> Jan, could you please look into it?
> 

I tried Dec 17 09:30 PST 2001. I got the same comparison failure. That
means

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-12/msg01658.html

causes bootstrap to fail on mips. You mentioned that you has tested
your patch on mips. Did you mean bootstrap on mips or build a cross
compiler for mips? Could you please fix your change?

BTW, am I the only one seeing bootstrap failure on mips?

Thanks.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]