This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A new regression from the inlining fix
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:26:18 +0000
- Subject: Re: A new regression from the inlining fix
- References: <20011214073449.A23284@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:
> It looks to me like my patch has uncovered an inlining issue
> elsewhere. It appears that something is getting tree inlined and not
> put in the object file when it should be, or a reference to it is not
> being removed when it should be. Or maybe the test requires extra
> flags?
Actually, the problem was that Nathan stripped the '# lineno' lines when he
was fixing tests to avoid implicit typename. I've put them back, and the
test passes again.
Jason