This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Build status page:Succes and failures.
- From: Gcc k6 testing account <caligula at cam029208 dot student dot utwente dot nl>
- To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:01:20 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Build status page:Succes and failures.
Ave gcc people.
I'm following the build status page discussion and here are my 2 cents.
When 3.0.2 was released I reported a succesfull build on
k6-redhat-linux-gnu and submitted the testresults with
test_summary.(October 24). Following this discussion,I tried to build 3.0
and 3.0.1. Those bootstraps were NOT succesfull.
So here's the summary on the k6 side.
gcc-3.0 -->No bootstrap.
gcc-3.0.1 -->No bootstrap.
gcc-3.0.2 -->Succsesfull bootstrap.
gcc-3.0.x-cvs -->Succesfull bootstrap.
gcc-3.1-cvs -->Succesfull bootstrap.
All this with:
gcc : 2.96-97
binutils : 126.96.36.199.8
glibc : 2.2.4
So maybe there could be a warning note on the build status page that
k6-redhat-linux-gnu bootstraps succesfully from 3.0.2 on. Just like
s390-linux-gnu starts to bootstrap from 3.0.1 on.
(please only reply to the list. This is a send only email-account)