This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wignored-returns?

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: "David E. Weekly" <dweekly at legato dot com>
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, gcc at gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:48:02 -0800
Subject: Re: -Wignored-returns?
References: <9F56E022-EAAD-11D5-8923-003065C86F94@apple.com> <0ba601c17ebd$1c7409d0$5c044589@legato.com>

I think the text in trouble.texi is that
"we don't think the compiler should warn
about unused return values", but I don't
read it as a refusal to provide such an
option, as long as it is not the default,
nor implicitly enabled by other flags.

So I say go ahead and submit a patch.  If
the implementation is clean, I'd be in favor.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/

References:
- Re: -Wignored-returns?
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: -Wignored-returns?
  - From: David E. Weekly

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]