This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: KDE hackers, please read (was [nathan@codesourcery.com: Re: GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix]) (fwd)
- From: Dirk Mueller <dmuell at gmx dot net>
- To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: Waldo Bastian <bastian at kde dot org>, kde-core-devel at mail dot kde dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 01:35:51 +0100
- Subject: Re: KDE hackers, please read (was [nathan@codesourcery.com: Re: GCC 3.0.3: Bugs to Fix]) (fwd)
- References: <200112042117.fB4LHCl03492@linux.local> <200112042250.OAA02613@atrus.synopsys.com>
On Die, 04 Dez 2001, Joe Buck wrote:
> But that causes an interesting problem. You say that you don't want to
> use RTLD_GLOBAL because someone might duplicate a class name (say,
> "DisplayList"). Of course, this violates the one-definition rule, but
> let's ignore that for a moment.
Point taken for the RTLD_GLOBAL part, but why do we need RTLD_NOW in order
to make RTTI work, as the original posting pointed out ?
I think lazy symbol resolving is the least thing an ABI should be capable of
when living in the 21th century..
Dirk