This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] fixincl.c vs solaris 2.6
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: bkorb at veritas dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkorb at pacbell dot net
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:23:59 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch] fixincl.c vs solaris 2.6
- References: <3C0D592B.8D8A45DB@veritas.com>
> Curious: Is the 'n' argument the problem in that it gets substituted
> in the "\n" string? That would be pretty weird, though, because the
> else clause is for __STDC__ being defined. How can you claim __STDC__
> and do that?? Oh, well. It's still approved.
I don't know. The original PR was for Solaris 2.5.1, but in our case
it fails for 2.6 but not 2.5.1 or 2.7 or 2.8. It also fails for the
unbundled compiler but not the bundled compiler. Go figure.