This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Is gcc 3.x broken on Linux/PPC?
- From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Nov 2001 20:03:15 -0600
- Subject: Re: Is gcc 3.x broken on Linux/PPC?
- References: <20011122001414.A1952@lucon.org><m3lmgy69z0.fsf@litecycle.cc.andrews.edu> <20011123170953.A1442@lucon.org><1006737223.2244.36.camel@litecycle.cc.andrews.edu> <20011125175559.A2741@lucon.org>
On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 19:55, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 07:13:43PM -0600, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > On Fri, 2001-11-23 at 19:09, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:34:11AM -0600, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > > > yes, it's broken. Read the thread by dje and zack.
> > >
> > > Is gcc 3.0.3 in CVS also broken on Linux/PPC?
> > >
> >
> > yup
> >
>
> I thought gcc 3.0 branch was supposed to be stable. I guess I was
> wrong.
oops, i wasn't talking about the branch, but of cvs mainline. dunno the
status of the branch.
>
>
> H.J.
--
Aldy Hernandez E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy
Red Hat, Inc.