This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Treelang frontend
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Tim Josling <tej at melbpc dot org dot au>
- Date: 21 Nov 2001 21:02:15 -0200
- Subject: Re: Treelang frontend
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0111170019410.66941-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Nov 21, 2001, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> The GCC Steering Committee has decided to
> put the treelang frontend into CVS, but do not include it in the
> default list of languages that is built. (This means that unless
> it's specifically asked for it doesn't build.)
Does this default apply to the CVS tree or only to releases? IMO, it
would be best to have treelang built by default in CVS snapshots (just
like we enable checking on CVS but not in release branches), and kept
working as part of the criteria for patch acceptance. Otherwise, it
may soon become useless, or require effort from a single person in
maintaining it.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me