This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: c++ name mangling question
- From: Alex Hornby <alex at anvil dot co dot uk>
- To: dewar at gnat dot com
- Cc: Ralf dot Habacker at freenet dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Nov 2001 14:59:16 +0000
- Subject: RE: c++ name mangling question
- References: <20011115131340.8C9ADF28CB@nile.gnat.com>
On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 13:13, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> <<I have read this already, but why should not now the time is coming to break
> this wall :-)
> I don't understand what your proposal here is. Surely you are not saying
> that g++ should require compatibility with each vendors c++ compiler?
> That would require major work for minor gain.
On a slightly related note - I understand that the common ia64 c++ ABI
specification gives something like this on Linux.
Is the same c++ ABI used for GCC's other intel ia64 targets? (other
unices and/or windows?) If so do any of the other compiler vendors (kai,
intel, ms etc) also follow it?