This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Change definition of complex::norm
- To: gdr at codesourcery dot com, nbecker at fred dot net
- Subject: Re: Change definition of complex::norm
- From: dewar at gnat dot com
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:25:46 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: HJSTEIN at bloomberg dot com, bkoz at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
<<I still don't understand why there is a preference for computing norm
via abs. Even when it is defined (built-in floating types), I believe it is
less efficient and potentially less accurate. Correct me if I'm
wrong.
>>
I agree with you, and I do not think you are wrong.