This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Serious internationalization problems: revert?
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: Serious internationalization problems: revert?
- From: rbrown64 at csc dot com dot au
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 01:19:38 +1000
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
>A recent change introduced three problems:
>(1) In some configurations, intl.h is not found.
>(2) Some configurations complain that make can't find -liconv, since
it gets erroneously considered a dependency.
>(3) There are dozens of warnings about missing declarations and format
>Is anybody working on this or is it time to consider reverting those
Wrt (1) at least CVS Wed Oct 17 23:03:18 UTC 2001 is working for me
on i686-unknown-sysv5UnixWare7.1.0 which had been failing for me before.
I needed to follow Zack's instructions, running autoconf and autoheader
and also found I needed to remove config.cache. make distclean didn't cut
Maybe maintainerclean would have.
My setup is screwy though. Hope this helps
--- 1011/warning.log Fri Oct 12 12:02:09 2001 (UnixWare 7.1 3.1)
+++ ./warning.log Sat Oct 20 01:23:27 2001
@@ -1,38 +1,50 @@
Counting all warnings,
-there are 89 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
+there are 139 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
Number of warning types:
-54 comparison between signed and unsigned
-8 function declaration isn't a prototype
+57 comparison between signed and unsigned
+17 function declaration isn't a prototype
+15 ISO C forbids zero-size array `???'
+12 ISO C89 forbids specifying subobject to initialize
+9 subscript has type `char'
7 string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers
quired to support
6 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
-3 missing initializer
-3 (near initialization for `???')
+2 traditional C rejects initialization of unions
2 passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
+2 missing initializer
2 implicit declaration of function `???'
+2 (near initialization for `???')
+1 unused parameter `???'
1 suggest not using #elif in traditional C
1 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
+1 right shift count >= width of type
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
1 `???' defined but not used