This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: basic_block index negative?
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Am Mit, 2001-10-17 um 17.11 schrieb 1003331515:
> > ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR and EXIT_BLOCK_PTR have negative index numbers
> > (-1 and -2 respectively).
> Thanks. Is there a special reason why those blocks have negative
Dunno. I guess because they're special and contain no program
instructions. The tree SSA code uses it to tell whether it found
a ghost definition (artificial definitions created by SSA).
> > It's also important to keep the index as a signed int to allow
> > reverse traversals of the bb array.
> Sorry, I can't follow you here...
If the index is unsigned, then a reverse traversal could get into
an infinite loop. Consider:
for (i = n_basic_blocks - 1; i >= 0; i--)