This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
basic_block index negative?
- To: GCC Mailinglist <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: basic_block index negative?
- From: Daniel Egger <degger at fhm dot edu>
- Date: 17 Oct 2001 14:24:27 +0200
I'm heftyly whacking the gcc sources at the moment because of all this
signedness in the sources. Can someone please explain to me how the
index of a basic_block is supposed to become negative? And if not,
how can the return in this snippet
if (then_bb->index < 0)
ever be triggered?