This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Loop unroll fixes
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Subject: Re: Loop unroll fixes
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:07:39 -0700
- cc: Wolfgang Bangerth <wolfgang dot bangerth at iwr dot uni-heidelberg dot de>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Wednesday, October 10, 2001 02:12:34 PM +0200 Franz Sirl
> At 10:16 10.10.2001, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:12:38 AM +0200 Wolfgang Bangerth
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> I anticipate those being the last changes for GCC 3.0.2.
>>> Not arguing for this just because it happened to bite me, but it might
>>> be worth to also look at c++/4512, which is a regression w.r.t. 3.0.1.
>>> Franz said he'll look into it.
>> Thank you for pointing this out. We need to identify this problem, fix
>> it, or remove the patch that is causing it. Regressions from previous
>> 3.0 releases are very, very bad.
> I already tracked down what's happening and produced a simple fix.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86 so far.
It looks a little hokey (no offense intendend; you're doing great under
tough constraints), but again, I can't see how it can hurt. So, go
ahead and check it in as soon as possible.
Mark Mitchell firstname.lastname@example.org
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com