This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Ada documentation issues
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
- Subject: Re: Ada documentation issues
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 20:36:12 +0200 (CEST)
- cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Note that some (but not all) of these issues were addressed by Florian
> Weimer in <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-10/msg00236.html>,
> which needs to be reviewed / applied.
Indeed, I was just reviewing that when your mail arrived. :-)
Florian, apart from a ChangeLog, there's only one issue I spotted with
the last part of your patch:
+Ada source code file which contains a library unit declaration (a
+declaration of a package, subprogram, or generic, or a generic
+instantiation), or a library unit renaming declaration (a package,
+generic, or subprogram renaming declaration). These files are also
"Such files are also..."?
@c GCC also knows about some suffixes for languages not yet included:
What happened to .ada? Your patch removes the old reference, but doesn't
introduce a new one -- is this intentional?
(As with the other parts, I'd prefer if one of our Ada maintainers
has a final look once you submit an updated version of your patches
and install them then.)