This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Darwin vs. libstdc++


Stan Shebs wrote:-

> Really?  I don't see anything in my C89 or C99 specs that suggests
> that isalnum and friends don't need function definitions.  For one
> thing, you can't take the address of a macro, so the standard would
> have to say explicitly that the address of isalnum is undefined.

You could have both.  Anything with a following '(' uses the macro.
Taking the address of the function will not have a following '(', and
so would not be treated by CPP as a macro invocation.

Neil.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]