This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: new __builtin_choose_type (patch) (new builtin_equal_typespatch)

To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: new __builtin_choose_type (patch) (new builtin_equal_typespatch)
From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:42:31 +0200
Cc: Magnus Fromreide <magfr at lysator dot liu dot se>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0110031005590.27827-100000@proton.lysator.liu.se><1002165585.31345.173.camel@culebra.cygnus.com><20011003235346.A16485@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

> Also, how does this function deal with qualifiers?  Is a const double
> equivalent to a double?  How about volatile?  Is 'signed int' the same
> as 'int'?

And what about typedefs?  ISO C doesn't have a concept of type
equality, I think.

References:
- Re: new __builtin_choose_type (patch)
  - From: Magnus Fromreide
- Re: new __builtin_choose_type (patch) (new builtin_equal_typespatch)
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: new __builtin_choose_type (patch) (new builtin_equal_types patch)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]