Re: need more constant constraints

[Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>]

> This contradicts http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-07/msg01007.html,
> which Kumar Gala sent out after getting a copy of Motorola's
> actual assignment and looking at it.

and i quote kumar:

    1. As far as the copyright is concerned.  Motorola did sign a future
    assignment back in August of 1993 for gcc.  I have a copy of it sent
    to me
    by Brian Youmans at FSF.  The 68k/88k references are in Schedule A
    not in
    the actual assignment (it looks like the standard assignment from
    that
    point in time).
    
that would be great.  i was just a bit hesitant because of the 68k/88k
reference.  but someone needs to clarify all this pronto.


    
> Given that Motorola's assignment has been repeatedly cast into doubt
> by non-Motorola people (myself included), I'd say that at this point
> no statement from Motorola will be sufficient, and we're going to
> need an explicit ruling by the FSF.  The situation is ridiculous, is
> interfering with progress, and I'd like us to put an end to it once
> and for all.
> 
> Stan
-- 
Aldy Hernandez					E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy on a Motorcycle
Red Hat, Inc.