This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: questions of gcc compiling.

To: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
Subject: Re: questions of gcc compiling.
From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, lyq at sunny-capital dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jack at ice dot mudshark dot org, rth at redhat dot com, jakub at redhat dot com
References: <200109250545.NAA06688@mail.jia.net><20010925101410.A1544@us.ibm.com><ydd7kun88sa.fsf@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

   From: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
   Date: 25 Sep 2001 19:44:37 +0200

   I had prepared the patch below for install.texi, explaining why GCC 3.0.x
   shouldn't be used with 64-bit SPARC V9 on Solaris 7/8, but none of the
   SPARC maintainers has commented on its accuracy yet.  This should really
   be dealt with in time for the 3.0.2 release, since this question comes up
   over and over again in many fora.

I think this is fine, and I will put it into the tree later today.

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: Jack Cummings

References:
- questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: =?GB2312?Q?=C1=F5=D3=A2=C8=A8?=
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: questions of gcc compiling.
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]