This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Successful build
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:55:15AM -0700, Jack Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 11:47:32AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > If these aren't straightforward then I'd rather not include them in the
> > build status list unless there is good documentation about all specific
> > problems for them in the section of install.texi about "Host/target
> > specific installation notes for GCC".
> Okay. What makes it "less than straightforward" is that you have to
> build a cross compiler from 32->64 bit first, and then a native
> > Do these work for 3.0.1? I though that 64-bit sparc support wouldn't
> > be available until 3.1.
> Hmm. I haven't run into any problems with it.
> sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 ( c, c++ )
> === gcc Summary ===
> # of expected passes 15140
> # of unexpected failures 25
> # of expected failures 77
> # of unresolved testcases 8
> # of unsupported tests 50
> === g++ Summary ===
> # of expected passes 6478
> # of unexpected failures 12
> # of expected failures 103
> # of untested testcases 21
OK, I added the following to the GCC 3.0 build status page:
sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 Successful (C and C++, built with 32->64 bit cross compiler)
You said you'd also built hppa64-hp-hpux11.00; does that need the same
kind of comment?