gcc archive
date index for September, 2001

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2001
20:03 Re: cvs access to gcc source code Carlo Wood
19:52 cvs access to gcc source code anupam kapoor
18:30 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Christopher Faylor
18:24 Re: Help : File does not end with newline dewar
18:17 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Zack Weinberg
18:00 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Christopher Faylor
17:46 find_reloads_address_1 question Ulrich Weigand
17:44 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Paul Lim
17:43 Re: Help : File does not end with newline dewar
16:26 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Kai Henningsen
16:16 Re: dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Jean-Pierre Radley
15:19 We're having trouble reaching you List Builder
14:43 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Zack Weinberg
13:43 Re: dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Robert Lipe
13:02 Re: ASM_OUTPUT_SECTION_NAME cleanup Joern Rennecke
12:23 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Alexandre Oliva
09:59 Re: Help : File does not end with newline dewar
09:40 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Jeff Sturm
09:35 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
09:26 Help : File does not end with newline Paul Lim
08:12 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Andreas Schwab
05:19 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Toon Moene

September 29, 2001
22:48 Exception Handling address comparison implementation error David Edelsohn
20:49 Re: dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Jean-Pierre Radley
19:37 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
18:32 OT: Re: Proposal Michael Matz
17:22 Re: Proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
17:11 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Berlin
15:45 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
15:45 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
15:40 dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Robert Lipe
14:33 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Aldy Hernandez
11:02 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Berlin
10:30 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Alexandre Oliva
09:31 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Toon Moene
09:10 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
09:05 十月企业建站(域名、空间)大礼包,不可错过哦! Today's Net
08:49 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Berlin
08:48 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Berlin
08:25 Re: Optimization: RedHat vs. GCC v3.0x? Tim Prince
07:45 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Alexandre Oliva
07:42 Optimization: RedHat vs. GCC v3.0x? Steve Snyder
06:40 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
06:38 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
06:11 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
06:01 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
06:01 libtool - how to find/make it ? Toon Moene
06:01 Re: g77 Toon Moene
05:57 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
05:54 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
05:42 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
04:36 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Egger
00:23 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Gabriel Dos Reis

September 28, 2001
20:01 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Carlo Wood
19:51 Print SPC, Barcode and GD&T symbol fonts from your Computer in Word, Excel, CAD etc. Kanecal Customer Service
17:57 ADV: Your Search Engine Rankings brian0726
17:32 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Tim Hollebeek
15:37 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Berlin
14:40 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Alexandre Oliva
14:33 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Gabriel Dos Reis
14:25 Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
14:19 g77 Rafael Edgardo Carlos Reyes
14:09 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Alexandre Oliva
14:07 Re: Entry point for LD Alexandre Oliva
13:21 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Tim Prince
12:45 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Diego Novillo
12:11 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Toon Moene
10:49 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Michael Matz
10:25 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Diego Novillo
10:13 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation David Edelsohn
09:38 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
08:48 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Berlin
08:39 Re: C++ Exception handling is too slow on iPAQ Philip Blundell
07:49 Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Carlo Wood
07:20 Re: need more constant constraints Stan Shebs
07:17 Re: need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
07:14 Re: need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
06:58 Re: need more constant constraints David Edelsohn
06:49 Re: need more constant constraints Stan Shebs
05:24 Re: need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
04:39 Re: "Requested array too large for target" Richard Kenner
03:39 gcc success on slackware Thul
03:17 Entry point for LD Dainius
02:59 Re: [Fwd: Arm cross compiler: Error] Nick Clifton
01:56 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Egger
01:32 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
00:59 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Egger
00:39 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
00:21 Re: c++/4095 Richard Henderson
00:17 Re: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stack fram e] Richard Henderson
00:05 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Egger

September 27, 2001
23:31 [Fwd: Arm cross compiler: Error] sivashankar nagappan
21:04 Re: c++/4095 Craig Rodrigues
20:16 RE: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stack fram e] Fabrice Gautier
20:12 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes law
20:12 Re: "Requested array too large for target" law
19:54 Re: need more constant constraints David Edelsohn
18:52 Re: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stack fram e] Richard Henderson
18:35 RE: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackfram e] Fabrice Gautier
17:51 RE: Intergraph CLIPPER bug... Mackinlay, Patrick
17:19 Re: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackfram e] Richard Henderson
17:18 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
17:13 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Kenner
16:56 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
16:50 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
16:38 Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackframe] Fabrice Gautier
16:36 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
16:35 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
16:22 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
16:15 Web site problems SWARTWOUT, DAVE C. (JSC-DL2) (
16:05 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
15:53 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
15:32 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
15:27 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
15:26 Re: fstream(int fd) John Levon
15:23 Re: #include <new.h> now causes a warning Gabriel Dos Reis
15:14 Re: fstream(int fd) Phil Edwards
15:14 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
15:11 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
15:06 fstream(int fd) John Levon
14:59 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
14:23 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end Zack Weinberg
14:20 Re: need more constant constraints Geoff Keating
14:16 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes mike stump
14:15 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
13:57 Re: C++ Exception handling is too slow on iPAQ Jaswinder Singh
13:54 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
13:54 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
13:15 Re: libiberty docs are in Phil Edwards
13:12 Re: libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
12:57 Re: libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
12:45 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
12:45 Re: #include <new.h> now causes a warning Magnus Fromreide
12:44 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
12:37 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
12:33 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
12:07 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
12:03 need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
12:02 Re: libiberty docs are in Phil Edwards
12:01 Re: libiberty docs are in Phil Edwards
11:49 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
11:48 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Kenner
11:46 gcov usage question nbecker
11:41 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
11:34 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Jacobowitz
11:32 RE: Gcc from Windows Jan Reimers
11:21 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
11:15 RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackframe Fabrice Gautier
10:57 Re: GCC depending on perl? Alexandre Oliva
10:43 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
10:37 Re: [iimura@microunity.com: GNU documentation format] Gerald Pfeifer
10:30 Gcc from Windows lpinheiro
10:27 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Henderson
10:23 [iimura@microunity.com: GNU documentation format] GNU General Contact Address
10:20 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
10:18 Re: __gccmain mike stump
09:58 __gccmain Dainius
09:57 Re: libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
09:40 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
09:15 Re:Backend for Microchip's PIC micro-controllers Kevin.Tucker
09:04 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Matt Kraai
08:52 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Kenner
08:45 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
08:45 Backend for Microchip's PIC micro-controllers Raimund Kirner
08:37 Re: GCC depending on perl? Andrew Cagney
08:32 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Gerald Pfeifer
08:24 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Jan Hubicka
08:06 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
07:58 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:47 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes David Edelsohn
07:38 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
07:28 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
07:27 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:18 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end mike stump
07:14 Re: Intergraph CLIPPER bug... mike stump
07:13 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Gerald Pfeifer
07:09 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
07:09 Re: floor on i386 Frank Klemm
06:38 Re: dynamic PIC register? Stan Shebs
06:29 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
06:27 Re: dynamic PIC register? Andreas Schwab
05:42 Re: c++ cast bug ? Alexandre Oliva
05:40 Re: recent gdb add-symbol-file problem? Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: GCC configuration problems Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: Proposal Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: Pointer-to-member type matching in template class Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: dynamic PIC register? Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: GCC depending on perl? Alexandre Oliva
03:30 Re: libiberty docs are in Timothee Besset
03:20 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
03:18 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
02:51 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Rainer Orth
02:46 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Rainer Orth
01:00 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end Zack Weinberg
00:42 Re: size of the Global Offset Table Jakub Jelinek
00:41 Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28in cp/xref.o) Gerald Pfeifer
00:07 Re: gnatsweb on gcc.gnu.org updated Gerald Pfeifer

September 26, 2001
23:44 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end Neil Booth
23:22 Intergraph CLIPPER bug... Mackinlay, Patrick
20:05 Help with gcc problem Denis Lukianov
18:46 Some experiments with cpplib's output end Zack Weinberg
17:27 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
17:05 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Joseph S. Myers
16:52 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Fergus Henderson
16:42 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Brad Lucier
16:27 Re: gnatsweb on gcc.gnu.org updated Tom Tromey
16:23 Re: Alignment of Stack Alexandre Oliva
16:19 Re: floor on i386 dewar
16:19 Re: size of the Global Offset Table Alexandre Oliva
15:45 Re: floor on i386 Frank Klemm
15:22 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Neil Booth
15:06 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Rainer Orth
14:45 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Neil Booth
14:18 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Rainer Orth
13:39 Re: status of the 3.1 release (Apple contributions ?) dewar
13:38 Re: Build errors - target i386-pc-mingw32 mike stump
13:11 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Richard Henderson
13:05 another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o lucier
13:03 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Henderson
12:47 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Richard Henderson
12:46 Re: Reentering sections Richard Henderson
11:56 libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
11:41 Re: FW: gcc 3.01 installation question Phil Edwards
11:16 FW: gcc 3.01 installation question Debbie Gilbert
11:06 Re: status of the 3.1 release (Apple contributions ?) Stan Shebs
11:02 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Jack Cummings
10:58 status of the 3.1 release (Apple contributions ?) Aurelien
10:55 RE: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Joerg Faschingbauer
10:32 Re: java Tom Tromey
10:25 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Alexandre Petit-Bianco
09:27 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Joe Buck
09:03 RE: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Schirmer, Hartmut
07:57 Re: GCC configuration problems Tim Prince
07:14 Re: java Alex Buell
06:36 GCC configuration problems Dainius
06:27 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Joerg Faschingbauer
06:02 Re: java Tom Tromey
06:00 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Rainer Orth
05:19 Re: java Alex Buell
05:14 Re: Reentering sections Roman Lechtchinsky
04:19 sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Alex Zhukov
04:18 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Jan Hubicka
04:14 Re: floor on i386 Jan Hubicka
04:11 java Julien Frison
03:08 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Erik Corry
01:07 About Build Application on ChorusOS using Gcc Qian, Ling (Ling)
00:16 Re: GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 william

September 25, 2001
21:35 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Jim Wilson
18:46 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Phil Edwards
16:33 Bootstrapping problems with mainline cvs on ppc-linux Daniel Egger
16:25 Re: flags -DSOLARIS -DP_SOLARIS for gcc Phil Edwards
14:53 =?koi8-r?B?0M/Nz8fJ1MUg09DB09TJIM3BzMXO2MvVwCDExdfP3svVIQ==?= Gavrilovy
14:04 Build errors - target i386-pc-mingw32 Casper Hornstrup
13:41 Re: GCC and p-strings ? Neil Booth
13:39 Re: GCC and p-strings ? Dale Johannesen
13:32 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Alexandre Petit-Bianco
13:24 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
12:59 Re: questions of gcc compiling. David S. Miller
12:59 Re: gnu under windows Tim Prince
12:53 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Jack Cummings
12:53 GCC and p-strings ? qmk
12:52 Re: floor on i386 Tim Prince
12:48 Re: floor on i386 Frank Klemm
12:45 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jakub Jelinek
12:44 Re: questions of gcc compiling. David S. Miller
12:21 flags -DSOLARIS -DP_SOLARIS for gcc Mike Xu
12:15 Re: Why not a label for .debug_frame? Stan Shebs
12:01 DWARF2 unwinding required in gcc 3.1? Bob Wilson
11:54 A Reminder: Freenix 2002 - 9-14 of June, 2002. Toon Moene
11:42 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 David Edelsohn
11:36 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
11:27 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Janis Johnson
10:44 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Rainer Orth
10:36 Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackframe Fabrice Gautier
10:31 Re: gnu under windows Janis Johnson
10:22 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Janis Johnson
10:17 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
09:59 Re: gnu under windows Thomas Pollinger
09:47 gnu under windows Zivi, David
08:35 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
08:33 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
08:14 Re: df.c data reprezentation Diego Novillo
08:08 Re: df.c data reprezentation Jan Hubicka
08:00 Re: floor on i386 Jan Hubicka
08:00 Re: df.c data reprezentation Daniel Berlin
07:59 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:55 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
07:47 Re: floor on i386 Brad Lucier
07:25 df.c data reprezentation Jan Hubicka
07:16 df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:05 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) dewar
07:05 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Richard Kenner
06:51 RE: Installing and compiling gcc athi.sathiamoorthy
06:50 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Gerald Pfeifer
06:47 Re: floor on i386 Jan Hubicka
06:39 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Jason Merrill
06:38 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Jan Hubicka
06:30 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) dewar
06:28 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Jan Hubicka
06:23 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Jason Merrill
05:41 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Richard Kenner
04:52 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Jason Merrill
01:52 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jakub Jelinek
01:40 RE: Bug report optimization #4186 and ia64 Nuesser, Wilhelm

September 24, 2001
23:13 build of gcc 3.0.1 problems Allen Wayne Best
22:56 Re: Why not a label for .debug_frame? Robert Lipe
22:40 questions of gcc compiling. =?GB2312?Q?=C1=F5=D3=A2=C8=A8?
21:45 Re: Target mips64vr4100 (i386-hosted cross compiler) Eric Christopher
18:34 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Daniel Berlin
18:13 Re: Why not a label for .debug_frame? Richard Henderson
17:37 Why not a label for .debug_frame? Stan Shebs
17:24 gcc-ss-20010924 is now available law
17:18 CFG and libcall conflict for java Jim Wilson
16:51 Re: Successful build Jack Cummings
16:47 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
16:28 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
15:46 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Richard Henderson
15:43 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:19 Re: basic block reordering + java Richard Henderson
14:56 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages mike stump
14:30 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Benjamin Kosnik
14:24 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Janis Johnson
14:13 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Phil Edwards
13:30 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages mike stump
13:18 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Benjamin Kosnik
13:18 Re: assemble_integer & align Richard Henderson
13:17 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
13:10 Re: Unable to generate reloads Geoff Keating
13:04 Re: dynamic PIC register? Geoff Keating
12:55 Re: FTP access to libstdc++ Joe Buck
12:50 Re: Bug report optimization #4186 and ia64 Jim Wilson
12:45 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Richard Henderson
11:55 Re: Successful build Jack Cummings
11:46 where to report libiberty bugs? DJ Delorie
11:45 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
11:32 Re: Successful build Jack Cummings
11:26 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
11:18 Re: 3.0.1 built on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 Janis Johnson
10:52 Re: floor on i386 Alexandre Oliva
10:50 Re: FTP access to libstdc++ Alexandre Oliva
10:25 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
10:19 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
10:16 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Richard Earnshaw
10:15 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
10:12 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Phil Edwards
10:02 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
09:39 Re: make dist (?) and changing version numbers Phil Edwards
09:37 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
09:31 Re: Loop unroll fixes law
09:04 Re: make dist (?) and changing version numbers David Vrabel
08:31 Re: make dist (?) and changing version numbers Phil Edwards
07:37 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.c Hans-Peter Nilsson
07:20 RE: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.c Greg Hosler
07:03 Bug report optimization #4186 and ia64 Willi Ner
06:44 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Rick Copeland
06:37 Re: Unable to generate reloads Lars Brinkhoff
06:27 Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:50 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Josh Fryman
04:49 Re: basic block reordering + java Jan Hubicka
04:34 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
04:00 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Richard Earnshaw
03:44 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Nick Clifton
03:04 make dist (?) and changing version numbers David Vrabel
02:54 Re: GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 Andreas Jaeger
02:41 Re: Unable to generate reloads Lars Brinkhoff
02:29 Re: GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 Paolo Carlini
02:17 recent gdb add-symbol-file problem? renc stone
02:01 GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 william
01:54 =?KOI8-R?B?8sXLzMHNwSDXINLFx8nPzsHM2M7PyiDQ0sXT08U=?= =?KOI8-R?B?4fLwIPLm?=
01:04 enumeration value ... not handled in switch Schirmer, Hartmut

September 23, 2001
23:09 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Gerald Pfeifer
20:30 Re: help, a problem of gcc. Jeff Sturm
20:03 help, a problem of gcc. =?GB2312?Q?=C1=F5=D3=A2=C8=A8?
15:30 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Frank Klemm
10:02 Successful build John Warriner
08:16 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Andreas Schwab
07:55 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:35 gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Randolph Chung
04:52 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
04:36 Re: new front-end: ksi + few questions Fergus Henderson
04:29 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Michael Hayes

September 22, 2001
22:26 Re: problem with function trees Diego Novillo
20:25 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:29 GCC depending on perl? Andrew Cagney
17:10 problem with function trees Dave Morse
16:57 RE: Newbie wants to install gcc on windows 98 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
12:57 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Ray Lehtiniemi
11:16 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
10:17 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
09:31 modifying the ARM generation behavior? Josh Fryman
08:43 Re: basic block reordering + java Jan Hubicka
06:27 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
03:48 3.0.1 built on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 Michael Ritzert
02:25 Re: assemble_integer & align Denis Chertykov
00:48 Re: assemble_integer & align Richard Henderson
00:38 assemble_integer & align Denis Chertykov
00:10 The Program that Actually Works successnow

September 21, 2001
22:11 吏玂筽甮阂盡肈╯厨 gd168
21:26 Re: Unable to generate reloads Joern Rennecke
21:16 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Joern Rennecke
21:16 Re: Unable to generate reloads Joern Rennecke
19:14 Gcc - c4x using TMS320C32 Michael Hayes
19:11 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Michael Hayes
19:00 Newbie wants to install gcc on windows 98 Robert Allan Schwartz
17:12 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Ian Roxborough
16:51 Re: shared library, init Marc Espie
16:44 Successful build of 3.0.1 on ia64-unknown-linux Janis Johnson
16:03 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Janis Johnson
15:18 problem with function trees Dave Morse
14:54 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Fergus Henderson
14:47 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Fergus Henderson
14:37 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Dale Johannesen
14:09 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Per Bothner
14:06 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Dale Johannesen
13:53 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Phil Edwards
13:21 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
13:21 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
12:57 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Dale Johannesen
12:56 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages David Edelsohn
12:47 bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
12:10 Re: gcc problem mike stump
11:07 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Richard Henderson
11:06 Re: Your patch of August 2 to osf.h Rainer Orth
10:48 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Morten Welinder
10:36 Re: Reentering sections Richard Henderson
10:12 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Benjamin Kosnik
10:02 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Andrew Cagney
07:37 Re: basic block reordering + java Andrew Haley
07:33 Re: basic block reordering + java Jakub Jelinek
07:30 basic block reordering + java Andrew Haley
07:26 basic block reordering + java Anthony Green
06:09 Unable to generate reloads Lars Brinkhoff
05:22 Reentering sections Roman Lechtchinsky
03:41 Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 source code Gerald Pfeifer
03:36 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Gerald Pfeifer
02:46 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Gabriel Paubert
02:27 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Martin Kahlert
02:08 gcc 2.7.2.3 source code Kubinger Wilfried
01:13 Target mips64vr4100 (i386-hosted cross compiler) Pontus Lidman

September 20, 2001
18:58 ISA mismatch for GCC-3.0.1 william
18:55 Re: dynamic PIC register? David Edelsohn
18:11 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
18:04 Re: Strange Warnings Zack Weinberg
18:01 gcc problem mouhcin chergou
18:00 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Zack Weinberg
17:28 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
17:20 dynamic PIC register? dalej
16:37 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Richard Henderson
16:25 Re: X86-64 setup/configure support patch Richard Henderson
15:55 Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Ian Roxborough
15:36 Re: Problem: delete_dead_jumptables and constant pool references Ulrich Weigand
15:33 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Geoff Keating
15:17 Re: Problem: delete_dead_jumptables and constant pool references Richard Henderson
15:14 Re: Problem: delete_dead_jumptables and constant pool references Ulrich Weigand
14:59 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Neil Booth
14:06 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
12:47 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Per Bothner
12:34 Re: Proposal Russ Allbery
12:11 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Frank Klemm
12:03 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Morten Welinder
11:56 [RFC] Adding some rpath support. Theodore Papadopoulo
11:43 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Neil Booth
11:38 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Neil Booth
11:17 Re: Proposal Kai Henningsen
11:10 镌着 瘟 诹幸嫌 幸夏林 邢苏兴 幸夏账蒙 络噼祛恹沅眍 耦蝠箐龛麇耱忸.
10:54 Re: Which egcs ? mike stump
10:43 Re: GCC mike stump
09:44 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Per Bothner
09:40 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
08:48 Re: Documentation Florian Weimer
08:45 Relaxing -Wsign-compare Morten Welinder
08:43 Re: X86-64 setup/configure support patch Bo Thorsen
08:17 Re: freopen function Phil Edwards
08:05 Re: freebsd 4.4 and gcc 3.0 problem David Edelsohn
07:47 freebsd 4.4 and gcc 3.0 problem Benjamin Gross
07:06 New dynamic linker name Bo Thorsen
05:12 Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Martin Kahlert
04:51 悟忮 磬 玎镳铖 镳钿噫 镱牦镪 镳钿箨鲨 络噼祛恹沅眍 耦蝠箐龛麇耱忸.
04:21 X86-64 setup/configure support patch Bo Thorsen
03:56 question about g++ ver. 2.95.2 Stefanie.Steinert
02:04 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Franz Sirl
01:57 freopen function Michael Nabarro

September 19, 2001
23:15 Re: Documentation Marc Espie
22:39 Re: Which egcs ? Per Bothner
22:23 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Joern Rennecke
21:53 Re: 16 bit jump tables for -Oss - code Joern Rennecke
21:44 Re: SUBREG problems Joern Rennecke
20:52 c++ cast bug ? John Levon
20:23 Re: Which egcs ? Fr閐閞ic L. W. Meunier
18:10 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
17:15 GCC Jimmy X. Jia
16:45 Re: GCC Joern Rennecke
16:31 Re: GCC Joern Rennecke
14:51 Re: Documentation Joseph S. Myers
14:44 Re: Documentation dewar
14:31 Documentation Frank Klemm
13:40 Strange Warnings Frank Klemm
13:38 Re: Proposal Joe Buck
13:36 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
13:10 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
12:44 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
12:37 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
12:21 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
11:50 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Joe Buck
11:28 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joe Buck
11:18 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Joe Buck
10:50 Re: GCC mike stump
09:56 Re: GCC Frank Klemm
09:50 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Janis Johnson
07:05 Re: GCC Joern Rennecke
06:30 Gcc - c4x using TMS320C32 Thomas ku
05:37 GCC thomas joseph
05:04 shared library, init Roger Wells
04:19 Re: new front-end: ksi + few questions Michal Moskal
02:44 Re: Proposal dewar
02:41 Re: Proposal Richard Earnshaw
02:34 Re: Proposal dewar
02:23 Re: Proposal Tim Hollebeek
01:14 Re: Proposal Joseph S. Myers
00:06 Re: Proposal dewar
00:02 Re: Proposal Neil Booth

September 18, 2001
23:01 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
22:37 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
22:23 Re: new front-end: ksi + few questions Fergus Henderson
22:20 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
22:19 Re: Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
19:05 Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Shannon Koh
18:49 Great business & scientific charts for your reports & your website information@grapl.com
17:36 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Kenner
17:15 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.1 on i386-pc-solaris2.6 Janis Johnson
16:59 Re: Proposal Russ Allbery
16:56 Re: register parameter passing and library calls Alan Lehotsky
16:31 Re: Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu David Wheeler
16:30 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Marc Espie
16:27 Successful build of gcc-3.0.1 on i386-pc-solaris2.6 Chris DuPuis
16:23 Re: Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Phil Edwards
16:18 Re: patch tracking Marc Espie
16:08 Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu David Wheeler
15:57 Re: building binutils with gcc Phil Edwards
15:55 Re: Proposal Toon Moene
15:48 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
15:35 Re: Proposal Robert Lipe
14:22 Re: register parameter passing and library calls Joern Rennecke
12:34 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joseph S. Myers
12:30 Re: Proposal dewar
12:23 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
11:54 Re: Loop unroll fixes mike stump
11:37 Re: Proposal Kevin Handy
11:21 Re: Which egcs ? mike stump
11:14 Re: Proposal Joseph S. Myers
11:06 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
10:47 Re: Loop unroll fixes Benjamin Kosnik
10:25 Re: OpenMP implementation Zack Weinberg
10:21 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
10:02 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
09:58 Re: GCC 3.0.2 Richard Henderson
09:49 Re: patch tracking dewar
09:48 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
09:32 Re: Proposal dewar
09:08 OpenMP implementation Ariel Gonzalez
09:06 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
09:03 Re: GCC + Checher Joe Buck
07:54 Pointer-to-member type matching in template class Andrew J. Malton
07:42 Re: loading shared libreries Jeff Sturm
07:07 loading shared libreries Roger Wells
06:34 register parameter passing and library calls apl
06:33 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Marc Espie
06:29 Re: GCC 3.0.2 Marc Espie
05:28 Re: (Finding) A Logo for GCC Gerald Pfeifer
05:13 global data in shared libraries Roger Wells
04:44 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Joseph S. Myers
04:16 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Kenner
03:57 Re: Anyway to get compile flags from objects? dewar
03:52 GCC + Checher Flavius Bindea
02:30 Re: Proposal Joseph S. Myers
02:19 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joseph S. Myers
00:34 蝈腱犴 :-)

September 17, 2001
23:27 GCC 3.0.2 Mark Mitchell
20:25 Which egcs ? Fr閐閞ic L. W. Meunier
17:45 gcc-ss-20010917 is now available law
17:40 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question mike stump
17:22 Re: Loop unroll fixes Mark Mitchell
16:23 Re: removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Daniel Berlin
16:22 Re: Start and end of the GOT Richard Henderson
16:20 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
16:08 Re: Start and end of the GOT H . J . Lu
16:06 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit H . J . Lu
16:04 Re: removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Richard Henderson
16:00 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
15:57 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Jakub Jelinek
15:56 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: Start and end of the GOT Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit H . J . Lu
15:52 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Jakub Jelinek
15:50 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Richard Henderson
15:47 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
15:41 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
15:36 Re: Start and end of the GOT Jakub Jelinek
15:27 Re: What's bringing these symbols in??? mike stump
15:17 Re: Start and end of the GOT Richard Henderson
15:11 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Henderson
14:24 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joe Buck
13:16 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Henderson
11:32 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #3 H . J . Lu
11:31 Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:23 Re: What's bringing these symbols in??? Benjamin Kosnik
09:52 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #3 Marcel Ruff
09:44 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Ulrich Weigand
09:06 Re: Autobuild at NetWinder.org will be going away Rod Stewart
08:57 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 H . J . Lu
08:55 Re: Proposal Thomas R. Truscott
08:41 Re: Anyway to get compile flags from objects? Phil Edwards
08:32 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Phil Edwards
07:25 暑祆屦麇耜铄 镳邃腩驽龛. Oleg_atl
07:12 Re: removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Daniel Berlin
06:58 removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Jan Hubicka
06:41 Re: Anyway to get compile flags from objects? Christoph Maurer
06:34 Anyway to get compile flags from objects? nbecker
01:00 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 Marcel Ruff

September 16, 2001
22:13 EARN MONEY the LEGAL & EASY way! MUST READ!!! ezdough
19:34 What's bringing these symbols in??? Benjamin Scherrey
18:55 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Ralf Baechle
18:19 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question DJ Delorie
15:50 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit H . J . Lu
15:04 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Joe Buck
14:46 Re: patch tracking Joe Buck
14:33 Re: empowering the steering committee (was Re: patch tracking) Joe Buck
14:14 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question David Edelsohn
13:01 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Gerald Pfeifer
12:41 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Rod Stewart
12:24 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Andreas Jaeger
11:46 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Richard Kenner
11:23 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Gerald Pfeifer
11:22 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Toon Moene
11:17 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Mark Mitchell
11:16 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Andreas Jaeger
11:07 Re: Autobuild at NetWinder.org will be going away Joseph S. Myers
11:02 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Gerald Pfeifer
10:59 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Mark Mitchell
09:20 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Matt Kraai
09:13 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 H . J . Lu
08:38 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Richard Kenner
08:35 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Daniel Berlin
06:39 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Richard Kenner
06:18 Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 Marcel Ruff
06:08 Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux Marcel Ruff
06:04 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Ulrich Weigand
04:23 about you website Christian Damkjer george
04:06 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Joseph S. Myers
03:38 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Graham Stott
03:12 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Andreas Jaeger
02:52 MAINTAINERS policy question Bernd Schmidt

September 15, 2001
23:28 PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NetWinder.org will be going away Gerald Pfeifer
19:01 Wanna get rich? Check this out, Just read it.. JBProductionsTc
17:47 Re: OSX shared libs: any ideas? Timothy J. Wood
17:42 building binutils with gcc james C. Georgas
17:12 RE: C++ Static Variable Initialization Marcel Ruff
16:30 Autobuild at NetWinder.org will be going away Rod Stewart
15:47 Re: 3.1 CVS Paolo Carlini
15:37 Re: 3.1 CVS Gerald Pfeifer
15:32 Re: OSX shared libs: any ideas? Paolo Carlini
15:18 OSX shared libs: any ideas? Jack Lloyd
15:04 3.1 CVS Jack Lloyd
15:00 Re: using linux environment variables such as $USER in c++ applications Paolo Carlini
14:43 Sucessful build on Cray T3E Duncan Coutts
12:59 gnatsweb on gcc.gnu.org updated Gerald Pfeifer
12:15 Re: Proposal Gerald Pfeifer
12:12 Re: Help! Erik Mouw
11:45 Proposal Frank Klemm
10:26 Tradcpp question Neil Booth
08:57 Re: Loop unroll fixes Bernd Schmidt
08:54 Help! Donny Nunez
05:40 FAQ status Joseph S. Myers
05:10 Moving AIX-related patch to doc/install.texi to the 3.0-branch? Gerald Pfeifer
04:54 MULTI_LIB vs. libtool: who will win Marc Espie
04:41 "Requested array too large for target" Richard Kenner
03:07 Re: patch tracking Bernd Schmidt
02:56 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joseph S. Myers
02:42 Re: Loop unroll fixes Bernd Schmidt

September 14, 2001
22:23 Re: Loop unroll fixes Jim Wilson
21:16 Re: Loop unroll fixes Daniel Berlin
20:11 Re: Loop unroll fixes David Edelsohn
19:56 Re: Loop unroll fixes Jim Wilson
18:35 Re: Loop unroll fixes David Edelsohn
18:33 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
17:54 Re: Loop unroll fixes Jim Wilson
17:33 Re: Start and end of the GOT Joy Mukherjee
16:45 Re: Loop unroll fixes Jim Wilson
16:26 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Kenner
15:53 Re: patch tracking Zack Weinberg
15:48 Re: patch tracking Zack Weinberg
15:27 Re: how to fix anti-optimization? Richard Kenner
14:53 Re: patch tracking Joe Buck
14:51 Re: patch tracking Joe Buck
14:50 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
14:47 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
14:41 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
14:36 Re: Loop unroll fixes David Edelsohn
14:31 Re: is 980223.c wrong? Richard Henderson
14:29 Re: broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/ Phil Edwards
14:24 Re: patch tracking Gerald Pfeifer
14:16 Re: patch tracking Phil Edwards
14:03 Re: patch tracking Zack Weinberg
13:36 Re: how to fix anti-optimization? Richard Henderson
13:02 [RFA]: Fix tests 980223.c and 20010327-1.c (was is 980223.c wrong?) Stephane Carrez
13:02 Re: how to fix anti-optimization? David Edelsohn
12:54 host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
12:50 Re: how to fix anti-optimization? Dale Johannesen
12:35 Re: patch tracking Phil Edwards
12:28 Re: patch tracking Joseph S. Myers
12:24 Re: patch tracking egcs
12:21 Re: patch tracking Diego Novillo
12:15 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joseph S. Myers
12:02 patch tracking Joe Buck
11:47 Re: Loop unroll fixes David Edelsohn
11:44 is 980223.c wrong? Aldy Hernandez
11:20 Re: sh-coff : what/where is gcc-2.95.4 ? Hartmut Schirmer
10:52 Cannot bootstrap gcc on main line Peter Schmid
10:46 Re: Loop unroll fixes Bernd Schmidt
09:41 Re: Loop unroll fixes David Edelsohn
09:41 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
07:44 Re: Start and end of the GOT Alexandre Oliva
07:40 Re: Forward class in throw declaration. Nathan Sidwell
07:16 Re: GCC 3.1 and branches (was: RFA: Deprecate C++ options) Mark Mitchell
07:06 Forward class in throw declaration. Andrew J. Malton
06:55 Re: Loop unroll fixes Daniel Berlin
06:10 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.2 released Jakub Jelinek
06:03 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.2 released Stephen L Moshier
05:35 Re: GCC 3.1 and branches (was: RFA: Deprecate C++ options) Gerald Pfeifer
05:16 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Gerald Pfeifer
04:02 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options George Gargey
03:42 RE: limits.h bug in gcc GNUTeam
03:23 Successful build Bert De Knuydt
02:42 Re: GCC Dump Nathan Sidwell
01:45 RE: limits.h bug in gcc Andrew Stubbs

September 13, 2001
23:50 Re: Loop unroll fixes Jim Wilson
22:40 RE: limits.h bug in gcc GNUTeam
19:29 Re: size of the Global Offset Table Joy Mukherjee
19:27 Start and end of the GOT Joy Mukherjee
18:58 Re: Loop unroll fixes David Edelsohn
17:36 Re: Global addressing Alexandre Oliva
16:54 Re: GCC 3.1 and branches (was: RFA: Deprecate C++ options) Mark Mitchell
16:35 Loop unroll fixes Zoltan Hidvegi
15:53 Alignment of Stack Frank Klemm
14:55 Tcl/Tk Upgrade.... Ian Roxborough
14:15 Re: GCC schedule of MIPS32 Eric Christopher
13:11 size of the Global Offset Table Joy Mukherjee
13:05 $B$J$s$4$/#M#a#g(B DoCoNo
12:46 Re: KDE: C++ and shared libraries Lubos Lunak
12:01 Re: [powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu 3.0.2] Bootstrap Failure Kaoru Fukui
11:03 Re: how to fix anti-optimization? Dale Johannesen
10:50 Re: how to fix anti-optimization? David Edelsohn
10:40 Re: long-calls in ARM Rafael Rodr韌uez Velilla
09:48 Re: Exception handling in GCC 3.0.1 on AIX platform David Edelsohn
08:49 Re: limits.h bug in gcc Andrew Stubbs
08:22 pbs with installation of gcc-3.0 on sunOS 5.6 Philippe Fullsack
08:01 Re: limits.h bug in gcc Rob Savoye
08:00 Re: GCC and LSB Joe Buck
07:56 Re: sh-coff : what/where is gcc-2.95.4 ? Joe Buck
06:02 Re: Line number notes revamp? Daniel Berlin
05:59 Re: Line number notes revamp? Daniel Berlin
05:48 sh-coff : what/where is gcc-2.95.4 ? GNUTeam
05:28 GCC and LSB Harold Hartley
05:03 Exception handling in GCC 3.0.1 on AIX platform Dmitry Dolgopolov
04:57 Re: limits.h bug in gcc Andrew Stubbs
02:56 Re: Line number notes revamp? Jan Hubicka
02:38 Re: Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
02:25 Re: Getting rid of -g Manfred Hollstein
01:36 Re: gcc 3.0.2 snapshot 20010903 bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
01:24 Re: Line number notes revamp? Richard Henderson
01:08 Re: Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
00:00 Re: Line number notes revamp? Neil Booth

September 12, 2001
23:58 Re: Line number notes revamp? Zack Weinberg
23:00 Re: Line number notes revamp? Neil Booth
22:13 GCC schedule of MIPS32 Mitsuyasu Nakajima
20:58 DejaGnu 1.4.2 released Rob Savoye
17:56 GCC Dump Daqing Hou
16:16 Re: floor on i386 Joe Buck
16:11 Re: Line number notes revamp? Daniel Berlin
15:14 Re: how to fix anti-optimization? Richard Henderson
13:56 Re: Line number notes revamp? Richard Henderson
13:48 Re: Line number notes revamp? Daniel Berlin
13:33 Re: limits.h bug in gcc Benjamin Kosnik
13:06 Re: gcc 3.0.2 snapshot 20010903 bootstrap failure on ia64 Jim Wilson
13:05 Re: Line number notes revamp? Richard Henderson
12:50 Re: stl_relops.h collision conflict Joe Buck
12:30 Re: alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f bootstrap failing due to constructor encoding Richard Henderson
12:03 RE: floor on i386 Chris Lattner
11:51 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Merging CFG cleanups from trunk Diego Novillo
11:48 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Merging CFG cleanups from trunk Nathan Sidwell
11:34 how to fix anti-optimization? dalej
11:34 limits.h bug in gcc Rob Savoye
11:30 Re: alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f bootstrap failing due to constructor encoding John Wehle
11:10 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Rob Savoye
10:59 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Jakub Jelinek
10:54 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Gerald Pfeifer
10:49 Re: Getting rid of -g Richard Henderson
10:24 Re: Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
10:17 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merging CFG cleanups from trunk Diego Novillo
10:07 Re: 7.1.3 violation? Andreas Schwab
10:06 Re: Getting rid of -g Richard Henderson
10:02 Re: 7.1.3 violation? Joseph S. Myers
10:00 Re: alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f bootstrap failing due to constructor encoding Richard Henderson
09:41 Re: hpux 11.11 build Vazquez, Ed
09:31 Re: Cannot bootstrap gcc compiler on main line H . J . Lu
09:30 Why does peephole not handle JUMP before barrier? Alan Lehotsky
09:26 floor on i386 Brad Lucier
09:26 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Rob Savoye
09:24 Re: Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
09:15 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Alex Buell
09:13 Re: Cannot bootstrap gcc compiler on main line H . J . Lu
09:00 Re: Cannot bootstrap gcc compiler on main line Peter Schmid
08:57 Re: Cannot bootstrap gcc compiler on main line H . J . Lu
08:54 7.1.3 violation? Michael Price
08:53 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Rob Savoye
08:51 Re: Cannot bootstrap gcc compiler on main line Jakub Jelinek
08:44 Re: Getting rid of -g Manfred Hollstein
08:41 GCC 3.1 and branches (was: RFA: Deprecate C++ options) Gerald Pfeifer
08:32 Cannot bootstrap gcc compiler on main line Peter Schmid
07:56 Re: broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/ Gerald Pfeifer
07:49 Re: Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
07:46 Line number notes revamp? Jan Hubicka
07:44 gcc 3.0.2 snapshot 20010903 bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
07:43 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Joseph S. Myers
07:38 DejaGnu 1.4.1 fix Gerald Pfeifer
06:48 Re: Getting rid of -g Andreas Schwab
06:47 REPLY REQUIRED: LockDown Security List - Online Subscription Confirmation Lockdown Corp
06:35 Re: Blanket Copyright Assignment. Gerald Pfeifer
06:27 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Gerald Pfeifer
06:22 Re: broken link on gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
06:09 Re: Getting rid of -g Manfred Hollstein
05:49 Re: Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
05:41 Re: Getting rid of -g Franz Sirl
04:58 Re: Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
04:50 Re: Getting rid of -g Franz Sirl
04:27 Getting rid of -g Roman Lechtchinsky
04:16 FTP access to libstdc++ Rickey Costas
03:28 Re: toy frontend Michal Moskal
02:42 Re: stl_relops.h collision conflict Olaf Petzold

September 11, 2001
17:49 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Loren James Rittle
17:43 Re: need info to unsubscribe Philipp Thomas
17:28 need info to unsubscribe rob
17:22 Re: gcc under OS X Stan Shebs
15:45 alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f bootstrap failing due to constructor encoding John Wehle
15:22 Re: Effects of Compiler Flags on SPECint2000 dewar
15:19 gcc under OS X Barbara Nostrand
14:50 alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f bootstrap failing due to constructor encoding John Wehle
14:40 Re: KDE: C++ and shared libraries Jakub Jelinek
11:57 toy frontend Oskar Liljeblad
11:33 KDE: C++ and shared libraries Lubos Lunak
10:38 Sorting out all system calls called from a source code? Okehee Goh
10:26 Re: stl_relops.h collision conflict Joe Buck
10:02 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] Gerald Pfeifer
08:51 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap: ICE in bb-reorder.c Jan Hubicka
08:50 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap: ICE in bb-reorder.c Gerald Pfeifer
08:48 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap: ICE in bb-reorder.c Jan Hubicka
08:38 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap: ICE in bb-reorder.c Jan Hubicka
08:36 Re: i386 rounding modes and workaround solution Han-Kwang Nienhuys
08:13 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap: ICE in bb-reorder.c Jan Hubicka
08:09 sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap: ICE in bb-reorder.c Gerald Pfeifer
08:06 Re: long long / long long Linus Torvalds
05:06 Re: long long / long long Benedetto Proietti
04:57 stl_relops.h collision conflict Olaf Petzold
03:57 Added error message Richard Kenner
02:26 Re: long long / long long Jan Hubicka
02:21 Re: long long / long long Jan Hubicka
02:20 Re: long long / long long Jan Hubicka
02:13 Re: i386 rounding modes and workaround solution Jan Hubicka
00:27 [Fwd: FW: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure] Markus Werle

September 10, 2001
20:12 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
19:55 Re: long long / long long Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:18 openbsd gotoff workaround Richard Henderson
17:39 gcc-ss-20010910 is now available law
15:05 Re: Does libtool know how to deal with libgcc.a%s? Gary V. Vaughan
14:28 Re: Global addressing Joy Mukherjee
14:23 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Artur Grabowski
12:48 Re: long-calls in ARM Rafael Rodr韌uez Velilla
12:47 Re: long long / long long Michael Matz
12:18 Re: long long / long long Florian Weimer
11:50 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
11:46 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Daniel Berlin
11:42 -fno-rerun-loop-opt on current CVS version Andreas Jaeger
11:32 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Henderson
11:25 Re: long-calls in ARM Philip Blundell
11:09 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Daniel Berlin
10:48 Re: long long / long long mike stump
10:44 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Henderson
10:40 Re: long long / long long David Edelsohn
10:28 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
10:21 Re: long long / long long Linus Torvalds
10:17 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Daniel Berlin
10:12 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Jakub Jelinek
10:07 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Marc Espie
10:07 Re: long-calls in ARM Michael Meissner
10:04 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? David Edelsohn
10:02 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] David Edelsohn
10:01 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Jakub Jelinek
09:59 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Henderson
09:58 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Marc Espie
09:53 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Jakub Jelinek
09:49 Re: long-calls in ARM Nick Clifton
09:45 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Marc Espie
09:37 Re: 3.0 vs 3.0.1 on oopack's Max Jan Hubicka
09:33 long-calls in ARM Rafael Rodr韌uez Velilla
09:33 Re: 3.0 vs 3.0.1 on oopack's Max Paolo Carlini
09:28 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Nathan Sidwell
09:21 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
08:59 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Bernd Schmidt
08:48 Re: [jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?] Artur Grabowski
08:24 Re: i386 rounding modes and workaround solution Tim Prince
07:53 Re: i386 rounding modes and workaround solution Jan Hubicka
07:48 Re: suspicious obj-c warnings [3.1] H . J . Lu
07:48 i386 rounding modes and workaround solution Han-Kwang Nienhuys
07:15 Re: suspicious obj-c warnings [3.1] Aurelien
06:55 Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ? Marc Espie
06:53 Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ? Jakub Jelinek
06:49 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ? Marc Espie
06:28 Using rtx_varies_p vs rtx_unstable_p Daniel Berlin
06:20 Re: long long / long long Bernd Schmidt
06:08 Re: 2.95.4 release? Franz Sirl
05:28 Re: 2.95.4 release? Bernd Schmidt
05:23 new front-end: ksi + few questions Michal Moskal
04:59 Blanket Copyright Assignment. Con Bradley
04:44 Re: Multiplications on Pentium 4 Jan Hubicka
04:29 Re: Effects of Compiler Flags on SPECint2000 Toon Moene
04:04 Re: Effects of Compiler Flags on SPECint2000 Toon Moene
03:13 全面支持ASP、PHP 、JSP、PERL、CGI、数据库, 历史最低价 Today's NetWork
02:29 Tcl/Tk upgrade so far.... Ian Roxborough
02:11 Re: Multiplications on Pentium 4 Torbjorn Granlund
01:46 Effects of Compiler Flags on SPECint2000 Andreas Jaeger
01:20 RE: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Bernard Dautrevaux

September 09, 2001
23:54 Re: Performace decrease with -freduce-all-givs Andreas Jaeger
23:48 Re: Some SPECfp results for the simplify-rtx problem Andreas Jaeger
23:10 Re: Names for structs from RECORD_TYPE trees Zack Weinberg
23:00 Re: Names for structs from RECORD_TYPE trees Daniel Berlin
22:49 Names for structs from RECORD_TYPE trees David Morse
22:21 Re: long long / long long John S. Dyson
22:01 Performace decrease with -freduce-all-givs Kevin Camera
21:53 Re: long long / long long Joe Buck
21:31 Re: The compiling problems about Gcc-3.0.x Alexandre Oliva
21:20 Re: Oracle 8.0 Alexandre Oliva
21:19 Re: --nostdlib details? Alexandre Oliva
21:03 Re: is gcc-2.95.3 is capable of creating 64 bit code? Alexandre Oliva
20:39 Re: Global addressing Alexandre Oliva
20:38 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Alexandre Oliva
20:33 The compiling problems about Gcc-3.0.x Ming-Shae Wu
19:54 Re: Bug finding problem Alexandre Oliva
19:19 Re: Simple optimizations missing Geoff Keating
19:13 Re: 64-bit compilation Tim Prince
15:38 Please Read ! This will change your life h_ramsthaler
15:07 Re: 2.95.4 release? Franz Sirl
14:33 橡钿噫,镱牦镪 镳钿箨鲨,镱桉 镟痱礤痤. Anonymouse
14:22 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
14:14 Re: Who wrote gcc manual's trees chapter? Mark Mitchell
11:29 unsigned 64 bit % const Frank Klemm
08:44 Re: suspicious obj-c warnings [3.1] H . J . Lu
07:47 Re: Simple optimizations missing dewar
07:46 Re: Simple optimizations missing dewar
07:45 Re: Simple optimizations missing Andreas Jaeger
07:39 Re: Simple optimizations missing Graham Stott
07:20 Code size Frank Klemm
07:20 Simple optimizations missing Frank Klemm
06:01 suspicious obj-c warnings [3.1] Aurelien
05:35 Re: Some SPECfp results for the simplify-rtx problem Andreas Jaeger
03:53 64-bit compilation Sanjay Bhatnagar
01:28 Re: Some SPECfp results for the simplify-rtx problem Jan Hubicka
01:23 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
00:52 reload algorithm brahmaiah vallabhaneni

September 08, 2001
23:49 Some SPECfp results for the simplify-rtx problem Andreas Jaeger
20:14 long double = unsigned long long Frank Klemm
19:08 long long / long long Frank Klemm
18:12 Re: typed cast's Zack Weinberg
17:21 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Kenner
17:13 typed cast's Frank Klemm
17:13 Type problems with C Frank Klemm
17:13 Profiling and optimization Frank Klemm
16:56 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Michael Hayes
16:09 Fwd: Welcome to the "Open64-devel" mailing list Rayson Ho
15:40 Re: compile gcc on unixware 2.1.3 failed! Robert Lipe
14:57 Re: gcc 3.0 Craig Rodrigues
14:05 Re: 64-bit PowerPC code quality regression David Edelsohn
14:03 gcc 3.0 N V Krishna
14:00 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Daniel Berlin
13:09 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Henderson
12:58 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Jan Hubicka
12:50 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
12:23 FYI: Tcl/Tk upgrade plan.... STARTING Ian Roxborough
11:43 Re: 64-bit PowerPC code quality regression Richard Henderson
11:40 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Henderson
11:36 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Henderson
10:18 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
09:42 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Marc Espie
09:38 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Marc Espie
09:33 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
09:17 Re: Multiplications on Pentium 4 Jan Hubicka
09:15 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
09:09 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
09:03 Re: 3.0 vs 3.0.1 on oopack's Max Jan Hubicka
08:57 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
08:31 Re: Multiplications on Pentium 4 dewar
08:28 Re: Multiplications on Pentium 4 Jan Hubicka
08:22 2.95.4 Results for Linux/Sparc Alex Buell
08:04 Oracle 8.0 Kepa Larizgoitia D韊z
02:28 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Bernd Schmidt
02:15 Re: 3.0 vs 3.0.1 on oopack's Max Paolo Carlini
01:58 Re: debug names for mode(SI) et al Joseph S. Myers
00:46 --nostdlib details? Jack Howarth
00:22 Re: compile gcc on unixware 2.1.3 failed! Craig Rodrigues
00:02 compile gcc on unixware 2.1.3 failed! tao

September 07, 2001
22:23 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Daniel Berlin
21:27 Does libtool know how to deal with libgcc.a%s? H . J . Lu
20:48 Objective C++ Benoit Sevigny
20:34 Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Michael Hayes
19:49 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Zack Weinberg
18:50 Re: 64-bit PowerPC code quality regression David Edelsohn
18:47 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:39 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:30 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
17:34 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Hubert Feyrer
17:27 Re: 64-bit PowerPC code quality regression Richard Henderson
17:03 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? Richard Henderson
16:53 Re: 3.0 vs 3.0.1 on oopack's Max Richard Henderson
16:13 64-bit PowerPC code quality regression David Edelsohn
16:07 Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
15:12 debug names for mode(SI) et al DJ Delorie
14:53 Who wrote gcc manual's trees chapter? Dave Morse
14:17 Re: New Successful Build GCC 3.0.1 Janis Johnson
13:50 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc mike stump
13:47 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] mike stump
13:46 Re: Multiplication Frank Klemm
13:40 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Jason Merrill
12:50 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Loren James Rittle
12:14 Re: Multiplications on Pentium 4 Michael Meissner
11:54 Multiplications on Pentium 4 Frank Klemm
11:41 is gcc-2.95.3 is capable of creating 64 bit code? Loan Tran
11:40 Re: Store motion related questions Stephen L Moshier
11:32 Re: Successful build of GCC 3.0 Janis Johnson
11:28 New Successful Build GCC 3.0.1 Dave Murray
10:23 Successful build of GCC 3.0 Ken Siersma
10:14 Re: 3.0 vs 3.0.1 on oopack's Max Tim Prince
10:13 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Benjamin Kosnik
10:10 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Marc Espie
10:06 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Benjamin Kosnik
10:00 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
09:41 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options George Garvey
09:03 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
08:52 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options George Garvey
08:41 Exception handling question Josep Lluis Colom
08:39 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Mark Mitchell
08:32 MIPS -mmad operation Carl van Schaik
07:19 Store motion related questions Daniel Berlin
06:43 3.0 vs 3.0.1 on oopack's Max Paolo Carlini
04:16 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Adrian Bunk
03:47 Re: 2.95.4 testsuite problems Franz Sirl
03:38 Re: 2.95.4 testsuite problems Marc Espie
03:26 Re: 2.95.4 testsuite problems Jakub Jelinek
03:18 Re: 2.95.4 testresults Bernd Schmidt
03:13 2.95.4 testresults Alex Buell
02:37 Re: 2.95.4 testsuite problems ab
02:17 Re: 2.95.4 testsuite problems ab
02:09 Re: 2.95.4 testsuite problems Franz Sirl
01:54 2.95.4 testsuite problems ab
00:03 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Richard Henderson

September 06, 2001
23:50 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Zack Weinberg
23:46 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Zack Weinberg
22:55 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] Joseph S. Myers
22:20 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
22:14 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Richard Henderson
22:11 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Richard Henderson
22:00 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
21:55 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Zack Weinberg
21:50 Re: gcc versus cl akbara
21:39 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc egcs
21:31 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc David Edelsohn
21:26 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc egcs
20:29 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Mark Mitchell
19:53 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] Matthew Hudson
19:53 RE: unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] Mackinlay, Patrick
19:29 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Craig Rodrigues
19:18 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] mike stump
19:16 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Joe Buck
19:05 broken link on gcc.gnu.org Dave Morse
19:04 unwind-dw2-fde.[ch] Mackinlay, Patrick
18:26 Re: gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Mark Mitchell
18:23 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
16:08 Re: Example of sloooooooooooow code Andreas Jaeger
16:06 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Dan Nicolaescu
15:54 Example of sloooooooooooow code Frank Klemm
15:21 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Joseph S. Myers
15:14 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Tim Hollebeek
14:47 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Richard Henderson
14:43 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
14:34 Re: gcc versus cl Tim Prince
14:12 Re: libgcc question Bahman Sistany
13:29 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Toon Moene
12:12 gcc versus cl akbara
11:33 Re: 2.95.4 Alex Buell
11:29 Re: Global addressing Joy Mukherjee
10:45 Re: 2.95.4 Rod Stewart
10:23 Re: CIL frontend for gcc Per Bothner
09:16 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) dewar
08:54 2.95.4 Alex Buell
08:46 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Toon Moene
08:44 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Lo颿 Joly
08:29 Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case Tom Tromey
08:08 Re: requested array too large for target law
07:30 Re: SGI discontinues Pro64 development Tim Prince
07:21 Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
07:11 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Andreas Jaeger
06:53 tree-serialize-branch created Daniel Berlin
06:17 gcc 3.0.1 does not work on Solaris 8/sparc Hubert Feyrer
05:25 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Toon Moene
05:15 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Andreas Jaeger
04:24 =?windows-1251?Q?=E1=E0=E7=FB_=E4=EB=FF_=EA=EE=ED=F2=E0=EA=F2=EE=E2_=EF=EE_=FD=EB=E5=EA=F2=F0=EE=ED=ED=EE=E9_=EF=EE=F7=F2=E5?= MailBase
03:56 Reportewa Prova
03:40 RFA: Deprecate C++ options Nathan Sidwell
02:58 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Toon Moene
02:31 CIL frontend for gcc Oskar Liljeblad
01:33 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Andreas Jaeger
00:36 PAC1 Prova
00:30 Re: ARC missing from list of supported CPU types Joseph S. Myers

September 05, 2001
23:17 Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case Geoff Keating
22:50 Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case Mark Mitchell
21:17 Re[2]: Exception handling in GCC 3.0.1 on AIX platform Dmitry Dolgopolov
21:15 Maximum line length iterations in ltconfig Matthew Hudson
21:02 Re: Exception handling in GCC 3.0.1 on AIX platform David Edelsohn
20:54 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Dan Nicolaescu
20:53 Exception handling in GCC 3.0.1 on AIX platform Dmitry Dolgopolov
20:36 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) lucier
19:33 Re: gcc on tru64 (hardware XP1000) mike stump
19:25 alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 =?big5?B?vkekQKWt?=
19:18 gcc on tru64 (hardware XP1000) =?big5?B?vkekQKWt?=
19:14 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Zack Weinberg
19:09 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Zack Weinberg
16:54 Re: I need a new GCC Michael Meissner
16:51 ARC missing from list of supported CPU types P. Berreitter
15:06 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Neil Booth
15:01 Re: requested array too large for target Alexandre Petit-Bianco
15:00 I need a new GCC Joshua
14:54 16 bit jump tables for -Oss - code Frank Klemm
14:50 Re: SGI discontinues Pro64 development Toon Moene
13:40 RE: mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 Thomas R. Truscott
13:15 SGI discontinues Pro64 development Jason Lee Eckhardt
13:05 requested array too large for target Tom Tromey
12:52 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:38 Bug finding problem Frank Klemm
12:33 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Zack Weinberg
12:31 Re: Driver rewrite... (was Re: RFC: should we use -Werror?) Zack Weinberg
12:16 Re: mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 Richard Henderson
12:09 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:50 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Richard Henderson
11:17 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Zack Weinberg
11:12 Re: Driver rewrite... (was Re: RFC: should we use -Werror?) Neil Booth
10:59 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:54 Driver rewrite... (was Re: RFC: should we use -Werror?) Zack Weinberg
10:44 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:41 Mailing list junk? Neil Booth
10:40 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Neil Booth
10:39 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:35 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Zack Weinberg
07:42 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Toon Moene
07:28 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Jan Hubicka
07:19 Re: -freduce-all-givs and fortran Toon Moene
06:58 -freduce-all-givs and fortran Jan Hubicka
06:57 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Geoff Keating
06:57 SUBREG problems thomas joseph
06:26 Re: 2.95.4 release? Bernd Schmidt
06:25 Re: 2.95.4 release? Bernd Schmidt
06:23 Re: 2.95.4 release? Bernd Schmidt
06:15 Re: 2.95.4 release? Carlo Wood
05:49 Re: mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 Tim Prince
05:40 Re: 2.95.4 release? Marc Espie
05:11 Re: 2.95.4 release? Vin Shelton
04:44 Re: mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 Jan Hubicka
04:33 Re: 2.95.4 release? Alex Buell
04:14 2.95.4 release? Bernd Schmidt
01:13 problem building gcc-3.0.1 John Van Der Ploeg
00:27 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Richard Henderson
00:22 RE: Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Bernard Dautrevaux

September 04, 2001
23:55 Re: Testsuite policy - test case now passes but bug remains Tom Tromey
23:53 Re: Free Translation Project Tom Tromey
23:53 Re: Free Translation Project Tom Tromey
23:53 Re: Can't build egcs-20000417 with cygwin-1.1.0 Chris Faylor
23:53 Re: Gcc 3.0 Open Issues Tom Tromey
23:53 Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case Tom Tromey
23:52 Re: Specs. DJ Delorie
23:52 Re: Need advice on bounds checking approaches Tom Tromey
23:52 Re: gcc bugs Tom Tromey
23:32 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Neil Booth
23:19 Re: Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Neil Booth
20:33 Re: Global addressing Alexandre Oliva
20:32 RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:05 Re: Error on compling libjpeg 6b by using gcc 3.0.1 Alexandre Oliva
16:02 gcc Brian Dilley
15:27 Re: Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Tim Hollebeek
15:10 Re: mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 Tim Prince
14:56 Global addressing Joy Mukherjee
14:38 Re: mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 Frank Klemm
13:50 Re: mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 dewar
13:29 gcc port on HP-UX 11i Tadeusz Wiewiorowski
13:11 Re: Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Eric Lemings
13:04 mul + div with 64 bit signed ints on IA32 Frank Klemm
13:00 Re: Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Zack Weinberg
12:55 Re: Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Neil Booth
12:50 Re: Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Robert Boehne
12:40 Quotes and Brackets In Include Directives Eric Lemings
12:20 Re: Multilibs with different configs (different include-paths)? Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:17 Re: The DFA based scheduler. Michael Meissner
09:28 Re: Inheritance/overloading problem Kevin Handy
09:08 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Phil Edwards
08:59 Re: The DFA based scheduler. Vladimir Makarov
08:41 Re: Inheritance/overloading problem (corrected post: ignore previous) Gabe Foster
08:16 Inheritance/overloading problem (corrected post: ignore previous) Dean Wakerley
07:52 Inheritance/overloading problem Dean Wakerley
07:13 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Gabriel Dos Reis
02:26 broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/ Achim Gaedke
02:13 殷瘥 潆 锣 turistkorona@mail.ru
00:55 RE: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Bernard Dautrevaux

September 03, 2001
23:51 unwind Francis Michel
21:33 Re: Re: new profiling features in GCC Yongzhu Li
20:18 Re: gmake Craig Rodrigues
20:04 gmake Lucio Flores
17:38 $BAj8_%j%s%/$N$*4j$$(B Reika Takamae
17:15 gcc-ss-20010903 is now available law
16:50 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Benjamin Kosnik
16:25 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Zack Weinberg
16:02 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Benjamin Kosnik
15:26 Re: 3.0.1 as a critical bug fix release including a new platform? Mark Mitchell
12:25 Re: Optimization is removing wanted branches Geoff Keating
10:24 Re: 3.1 compilation woes on Mac OS X Andreas Tobler
09:55 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Jakub Jelinek
09:34 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Zack Weinberg
09:29 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Nathan Sidwell
09:16 Re: #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Zack Weinberg
05:42 extern "C" namespaces Richard Smith
05:23 Re: new profiling features in GCC Carlo Wood
05:01 #include_next and removing of duplicate include dirs Jakub Jelinek
04:04 Re: Optimization is removing wanted branches Gabriel Paubert
03:03 3.1 compilation woes on Mac OS X Aurelien
03:02 The DFA based scheduler. Naveen Sharma
02:47 Re: Semantics of -fdump-ast? Nathan Sidwell
00:53 Please - LET Me Market For You! Robert Sand

September 02, 2001
21:01 Error on compling libjpeg 6b by using gcc 3.0.1 Brian Hui
19:19 new profiling features in GCC LI YONGZHU
17:22 Time to turn off libobjc on sparc? lucier
17:09 Loop unrolling Frank Klemm
14:13 GCC port for MSP430 Chris Liechti
11:52 Re: basic-block and profile-based optimizing (was Re: New attribute"infrequent"?) Mark Mitchell
09:53 Re: basic-block and profile-based optimizing (was Re: New attribute "infrequent"?) Jan Hubicka
09:40 Re: objdump Craig Rodrigues
09:37 Re: compiling LEDA 4.1 problem Craig Rodrigues
08:45 Multiplication of a block of integers Frank Klemm
08:45 objdump Frank Klemm
08:43 Re: Preserving clobbers in scheduling Jeff Sturm
08:40 compiling LEDA 4.1 problem Gabriel Arcos

September 01, 2001
15:53 Re: basic-block and profile-based optimizing (was Re: New attribute"infrequent"?) Mark Mitchell
10:21 Re: Code enlargement Richard Henderson
09:54 Re: New attribute "infrequent"? Jan Hubicka
09:45 Re: code alignment on K6-2 and Athlon Jan Hubicka
09:06 Re: Code enlargement dewar
09:01 [MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.cygnus.com: failure notice] Frank Klemm
08:56 Re: New attribute "infrequent"? Frank Klemm
08:56 code alignment on K6-2 and Athlon Frank Klemm
08:56 Code enlargement Frank Klemm
04:44 Re: -finline-functions tuning (Using on ET) Olaf Petzold
02:23 Re: GCC site error Gerald Pfeifer
02:20 Re: GCC site error Gerald Pfeifer
02:11 GCC site error Lotza Hair
00:58 PATCH for Re: gcc Postscript manual Gerald Pfeifer


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.9