gcc archive
date index for September, 2001

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2001
20:03 Re: cvs access to gcc source code Carlo Wood
19:52 cvs access to gcc source code anupam kapoor
18:30 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Christopher Faylor
18:24 Re: Help : File does not end with newline dewar
18:17 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Zack Weinberg
18:00 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Christopher Faylor
17:46 find_reloads_address_1 question Ulrich Weigand
17:44 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Paul Lim
17:43 Re: Help : File does not end with newline dewar
16:26 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Kai Henningsen
16:16 Re: dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Jean-Pierre Radley
15:19 We're having trouble reaching you List Builder
14:43 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Zack Weinberg
13:43 Re: dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Robert Lipe
13:02 Re: ASM_OUTPUT_SECTION_NAME cleanup Joern Rennecke
12:23 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Alexandre Oliva
09:59 Re: Help : File does not end with newline dewar
09:40 Re: Help : File does not end with newline Jeff Sturm
09:35 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
09:26 Help : File does not end with newline Paul Lim
08:12 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Andreas Schwab
05:19 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Toon Moene

September 29, 2001
22:48 Exception Handling address comparison implementation error David Edelsohn
20:49 Re: dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Jean-Pierre Radley
19:37 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
18:32 OT: Re: Proposal Michael Matz
17:22 Re: Proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
17:11 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Berlin
15:45 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
15:45 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
15:40 dwarfout change kills my bootstrap. Robert Lipe
14:33 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Aldy Hernandez
11:02 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Berlin
10:30 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Alexandre Oliva
09:31 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Toon Moene
09:10 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
09:05 Ê®ÔÂÆóÒµ½¨Õ¾(ÓòÃû¡¢¿Õ¼ä)´óÀñ°ü£¬²»¿É´í¹ýŶ! Today's Net
08:49 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Berlin
08:48 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Berlin
08:25 Re: Optimization: RedHat vs. GCC v3.0x? Tim Prince
07:45 Re: libtool - how to find/make it ? Alexandre Oliva
07:42 Optimization: RedHat vs. GCC v3.0x? Steve Snyder
06:40 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
06:38 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
06:11 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
06:01 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
06:01 libtool - how to find/make it ? Toon Moene
06:01 Re: g77 Toon Moene
05:57 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
05:54 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
05:42 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers dewar
04:36 Re: Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Daniel Egger
00:23 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Gabriel Dos Reis

September 28, 2001
20:01 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Carlo Wood
19:51 Print SPC, Barcode and GD&T symbol fonts from your Computer in Word, Excel, CAD etc. Kanecal Customer Service
17:57 ADV: Your Search Engine Rankings brian0726
17:32 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Tim Hollebeek
15:37 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Berlin
14:40 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Alexandre Oliva
14:33 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Gabriel Dos Reis
14:25 Apple's implementation of precompiled headers Stan Shebs
14:19 g77 Rafael Edgardo Carlos Reyes
14:09 Re: Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Alexandre Oliva
14:07 Re: Entry point for LD Alexandre Oliva
13:21 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Tim Prince
12:45 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Diego Novillo
12:11 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Toon Moene
10:49 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Michael Matz
10:25 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Diego Novillo
10:13 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation David Edelsohn
09:38 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
08:48 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Berlin
08:39 Re: C++ Exception handling is too slow on iPAQ Philip Blundell
07:49 Problem with `string', threading and shared libraries. Carlo Wood
07:20 Re: need more constant constraints Stan Shebs
07:17 Re: need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
07:14 Re: need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
06:58 Re: need more constant constraints David Edelsohn
06:49 Re: need more constant constraints Stan Shebs
05:24 Re: need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
04:39 Re: "Requested array too large for target" Richard Kenner
03:39 gcc success on slackware Thul
03:17 Entry point for LD Dainius
02:59 Re: [Fwd: Arm cross compiler: Error] Nick Clifton
01:56 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Egger
01:32 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
00:59 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Egger
00:39 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
00:21 Re: c++/4095 Richard Henderson
00:17 Re: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stack fram e] Richard Henderson
00:05 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Egger

September 27, 2001
23:31 [Fwd: Arm cross compiler: Error] sivashankar nagappan
21:04 Re: c++/4095 Craig Rodrigues
20:16 RE: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stack fram e] Fabrice Gautier
20:12 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes law
20:12 Re: "Requested array too large for target" law
19:54 Re: need more constant constraints David Edelsohn
18:52 Re: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stack fram e] Richard Henderson
18:35 RE: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackfram e] Fabrice Gautier
17:51 RE: Intergraph CLIPPER bug... Mackinlay, Patrick
17:19 Re: Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackfram e] Richard Henderson
17:18 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
17:13 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Kenner
16:56 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
16:50 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
16:38 Bug in Dwarf2 .debug_frame section [RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackframe] Fabrice Gautier
16:36 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
16:35 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
16:22 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
16:15 Web site problems SWARTWOUT, DAVE C. (JSC-DL2) (
16:05 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
15:53 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
15:32 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
15:27 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
15:26 Re: fstream(int fd) John Levon
15:23 Re: #include <new.h> now causes a warning Gabriel Dos Reis
15:14 Re: fstream(int fd) Phil Edwards
15:14 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
15:11 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
15:06 fstream(int fd) John Levon
14:59 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
14:23 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end Zack Weinberg
14:20 Re: need more constant constraints Geoff Keating
14:16 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes mike stump
14:15 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
13:57 Re: C++ Exception handling is too slow on iPAQ Jaswinder Singh
13:54 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
13:54 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) John Wehle
13:15 Re: libiberty docs are in Phil Edwards
13:12 Re: libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
12:57 Re: libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
12:45 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
12:45 Re: #include <new.h> now causes a warning Magnus Fromreide
12:44 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
12:37 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
12:33 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Richard Henderson
12:07 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
12:03 need more constant constraints Aldy Hernandez
12:02 Re: libiberty docs are in Phil Edwards
12:01 Re: libiberty docs are in Phil Edwards
11:49 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
11:48 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Kenner
11:46 gcov usage question nbecker
11:41 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
11:34 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Daniel Jacobowitz
11:32 RE: Gcc from Windows Jan Reimers
11:21 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
11:15 RE: Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackframe Fabrice Gautier
10:57 Re: GCC depending on perl? Alexandre Oliva
10:43 Re: Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o) Richard Henderson
10:37 Re: [iimura@microunity.com: GNU documentation format] Gerald Pfeifer
10:30 Gcc from Windows lpinheiro
10:27 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Henderson
10:23 [iimura@microunity.com: GNU documentation format] GNU General Contact Address
10:20 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
10:18 Re: __gccmain mike stump
09:58 __gccmain Dainius
09:57 Re: libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
09:40 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
09:15 Re:Backend for Microchip's PIC micro-controllers Kevin.Tucker
09:04 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Matt Kraai
08:52 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Kenner
08:45 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
08:45 Backend for Microchip's PIC micro-controllers Raimund Kirner
08:37 Re: GCC depending on perl? Andrew Cagney
08:32 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Gerald Pfeifer
08:24 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Jan Hubicka
08:06 Re: A bit of vector extension documentation Bernd Schmidt
07:58 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:47 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes David Edelsohn
07:38 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
07:28 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
07:27 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:18 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end mike stump
07:14 Re: Intergraph CLIPPER bug... mike stump
07:13 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Gerald Pfeifer
07:09 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
07:09 Re: floor on i386 Frank Klemm
06:38 Re: dynamic PIC register? Stan Shebs
06:29 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
06:27 Re: dynamic PIC register? Andreas Schwab
05:42 Re: c++ cast bug ? Alexandre Oliva
05:40 Re: recent gdb add-symbol-file problem? Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: GCC configuration problems Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: Proposal Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: Pointer-to-member type matching in template class Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: dynamic PIC register? Alexandre Oliva
05:39 Re: GCC depending on perl? Alexandre Oliva
03:30 Re: libiberty docs are in Timothee Besset
03:20 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
03:18 Re: libiberty docs are in Eli Zaretskii
02:51 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Rainer Orth
02:46 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Rainer Orth
01:00 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end Zack Weinberg
00:42 Re: size of the Global Offset Table Jakub Jelinek
00:41 Unreviewed patch (was: another bootstrap failure onsparc-sun-solaris28in cp/xref.o) Gerald Pfeifer
00:07 Re: gnatsweb on gcc.gnu.org updated Gerald Pfeifer

September 26, 2001
23:44 Re: Some experiments with cpplib's output end Neil Booth
23:22 Intergraph CLIPPER bug... Mackinlay, Patrick
20:05 Help with gcc problem Denis Lukianov
18:46 Some experiments with cpplib's output end Zack Weinberg
17:27 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
17:05 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Joseph S. Myers
16:52 Re: RFC: should we use -Werror? (& sample patch to do it) Fergus Henderson
16:42 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Brad Lucier
16:27 Re: gnatsweb on gcc.gnu.org updated Tom Tromey
16:23 Re: Alignment of Stack Alexandre Oliva
16:19 Re: floor on i386 dewar
16:19 Re: size of the Global Offset Table Alexandre Oliva
15:45 Re: floor on i386 Frank Klemm
15:22 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Neil Booth
15:06 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Rainer Orth
14:45 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Neil Booth
14:18 Re: another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o Rainer Orth
13:39 Re: status of the 3.1 release (Apple contributions ?) dewar
13:38 Re: Build errors - target i386-pc-mingw32 mike stump
13:11 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Richard Henderson
13:05 another bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris28 in cp/xref.o lucier
13:03 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Richard Henderson
12:47 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Richard Henderson
12:46 Re: Reentering sections Richard Henderson
11:56 libiberty docs are in DJ Delorie
11:41 Re: FW: gcc 3.01 installation question Phil Edwards
11:16 FW: gcc 3.01 installation question Debbie Gilbert
11:06 Re: status of the 3.1 release (Apple contributions ?) Stan Shebs
11:02 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Jack Cummings
10:58 status of the 3.1 release (Apple contributions ?) Aurelien
10:55 RE: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Joerg Faschingbauer
10:32 Re: java Tom Tromey
10:25 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Alexandre Petit-Bianco
09:27 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Joe Buck
09:03 RE: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Schirmer, Hartmut
07:57 Re: GCC configuration problems Tim Prince
07:14 Re: java Alex Buell
06:36 GCC configuration problems Dainius
06:27 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Joerg Faschingbauer
06:02 Re: java Tom Tromey
06:00 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Rainer Orth
05:19 Re: java Alex Buell
05:14 Re: Reentering sections Roman Lechtchinsky
04:19 sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Alex Zhukov
04:18 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Jan Hubicka
04:14 Re: floor on i386 Jan Hubicka
04:11 java Julien Frison
03:08 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Erik Corry
01:07 About Build Application on ChorusOS using Gcc Qian, Ling (Ling)
00:16 Re: GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 william

September 25, 2001
21:35 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Jim Wilson
18:46 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Phil Edwards
16:33 Bootstrapping problems with mainline cvs on ppc-linux Daniel Egger
16:25 Re: flags -DSOLARIS -DP_SOLARIS for gcc Phil Edwards
14:53 =?koi8-r?B?0M/Nz8fJ1MUg09DB09TJIM3BzMXO2MvVwCDExdfP3svVIQ==?= Gavrilovy
14:04 Build errors - target i386-pc-mingw32 Casper Hornstrup
13:41 Re: GCC and p-strings ? Neil Booth
13:39 Re: GCC and p-strings ? Dale Johannesen
13:32 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Alexandre Petit-Bianco
13:24 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
12:59 Re: questions of gcc compiling. David S. Miller
12:59 Re: gnu under windows Tim Prince
12:53 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Jack Cummings
12:53 GCC and p-strings ? qmk
12:52 Re: floor on i386 Tim Prince
12:48 Re: floor on i386 Frank Klemm
12:45 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jakub Jelinek
12:44 Re: questions of gcc compiling. David S. Miller
12:21 flags -DSOLARIS -DP_SOLARIS for gcc Mike Xu
12:15 Re: Why not a label for .debug_frame? Stan Shebs
12:01 DWARF2 unwinding required in gcc 3.1? Bob Wilson
11:54 A Reminder: Freenix 2002 - 9-14 of June, 2002. Toon Moene
11:42 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 David Edelsohn
11:36 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
11:27 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Janis Johnson
10:44 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Rainer Orth
10:36 Gcc 3.0 and ARM Stackframe Fabrice Gautier
10:31 Re: gnu under windows Janis Johnson
10:22 Re: questions of gcc compiling. Janis Johnson
10:17 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
09:59 Re: gnu under windows Thomas Pollinger
09:47 gnu under windows Zivi, David
08:35 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
08:33 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
08:14 Re: df.c data reprezentation Diego Novillo
08:08 Re: df.c data reprezentation Jan Hubicka
08:00 Re: floor on i386 Jan Hubicka
08:00 Re: df.c data reprezentation Daniel Berlin
07:59 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:55 Re: df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Daniel Berlin
07:47 Re: floor on i386 Brad Lucier
07:25 df.c data reprezentation Jan Hubicka
07:16 df.c and partial writes/REG_EQUAL notes Jan Hubicka
07:05 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) dewar
07:05 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Richard Kenner
06:51 RE: Installing and compiling gcc athi.sathiamoorthy
06:50 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Gerald Pfeifer
06:47 Re: floor on i386 Jan Hubicka
06:39 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Jason Merrill
06:38 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Jan Hubicka
06:30 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) dewar
06:28 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Jan Hubicka
06:23 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Jason Merrill
05:41 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Richard Kenner
04:52 Re: Added error message (for too-large array) Jason Merrill
01:52 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jakub Jelinek
01:40 RE: Bug report optimization #4186 and ia64 Nuesser, Wilhelm

September 24, 2001
23:13 build of gcc 3.0.1 problems Allen Wayne Best
22:56 Re: Why not a label for .debug_frame? Robert Lipe
22:40 questions of gcc compiling. =?GB2312?Q?=C1=F5=D3=A2=C8=A8?
21:45 Re: Target mips64vr4100 (i386-hosted cross compiler) Eric Christopher
18:34 Re: CFG and libcall conflict for java Daniel Berlin
18:13 Re: Why not a label for .debug_frame? Richard Henderson
17:37 Why not a label for .debug_frame? Stan Shebs
17:24 gcc-ss-20010924 is now available law
17:18 CFG and libcall conflict for java Jim Wilson
16:51 Re: Successful build Jack Cummings
16:47 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
16:28 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
15:46 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Richard Henderson
15:43 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:19 Re: basic block reordering + java Richard Henderson
14:56 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages mike stump
14:30 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Benjamin Kosnik
14:24 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Janis Johnson
14:13 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Phil Edwards
13:30 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages mike stump
13:18 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Benjamin Kosnik
13:18 Re: assemble_integer & align Richard Henderson
13:17 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Jim Wilson
13:10 Re: Unable to generate reloads Geoff Keating
13:04 Re: dynamic PIC register? Geoff Keating
12:55 Re: FTP access to libstdc++ Joe Buck
12:50 Re: Bug report optimization #4186 and ia64 Jim Wilson
12:45 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Richard Henderson
11:55 Re: Successful build Jack Cummings
11:46 where to report libiberty bugs? DJ Delorie
11:45 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
11:32 Re: Successful build Jack Cummings
11:26 Re: Successful build Janis Johnson
11:18 Re: 3.0.1 built on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 Janis Johnson
10:52 Re: floor on i386 Alexandre Oliva
10:50 Re: FTP access to libstdc++ Alexandre Oliva
10:25 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
10:19 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
10:16 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Richard Earnshaw
10:15 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
10:12 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Phil Edwards
10:02 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? John David Anglin
09:39 Re: make dist (?) and changing version numbers Phil Edwards
09:37 Re: Why can't CSE recognize const_int's in HIGH LO_SUM pair? law
09:31 Re: Loop unroll fixes law
09:04 Re: make dist (?) and changing version numbers David Vrabel
08:31 Re: make dist (?) and changing version numbers Phil Edwards
07:37 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.c Hans-Peter Nilsson
07:20 RE: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.c Greg Hosler
07:03 Bug report optimization #4186 and ia64 Willi Nüßer
06:44 Re: Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Rick Copeland
06:37 Re: Unable to generate reloads Lars Brinkhoff
06:27 Buffer overwrite in libstdc++-v3 test 21_strings/c_strings.cc? Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:50 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Josh Fryman
04:49 Re: basic block reordering + java Jan Hubicka
04:34 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
04:00 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Richard Earnshaw
03:44 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Nick Clifton
03:04 make dist (?) and changing version numbers David Vrabel
02:54 Re: GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 Andreas Jaeger
02:41 Re: Unable to generate reloads Lars Brinkhoff
02:29 Re: GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 Paolo Carlini
02:17 recent gdb add-symbol-file problem? renc stone
02:01 GCC-3.0.1 can't compile Glibc-2.2.4 william
01:54 =?KOI8-R?B?8sXLzMHNwSDXINLFx8nPzsHM2M7PyiDQ0sXT08U=?= =?KOI8-R?B?4fLwIPLm?=
01:04 enumeration value ... not handled in switch Schirmer, Hartmut

September 23, 2001
23:09 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Gerald Pfeifer
20:30 Re: help, a problem of gcc. Jeff Sturm
20:03 help, a problem of gcc. =?GB2312?Q?=C1=F5=D3=A2=C8=A8?
15:30 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Frank Klemm
10:02 Successful build John Warriner
08:16 Re: gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Andreas Schwab
07:55 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:35 gcc cvs (010922) build error on ia64 Randolph Chung
04:52 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
04:36 Re: new front-end: ksi + few questions Fergus Henderson
04:29 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Michael Hayes

September 22, 2001
22:26 Re: problem with function trees Diego Novillo
20:25 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:29 GCC depending on perl? Andrew Cagney
17:10 problem with function trees Dave Morse
16:57 RE: Newbie wants to install gcc on windows 98 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
12:57 Re: modifying the ARM generation behavior? Ray Lehtiniemi
11:16 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
10:17 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Jan Hubicka
09:31 modifying the ARM generation behavior? Josh Fryman
08:43 Re: basic block reordering + java Jan Hubicka
06:27 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
03:48 3.0.1 built on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00 Michael Ritzert
02:25 Re: assemble_integer & align Denis Chertykov
00:48 Re: assemble_integer & align Richard Henderson
00:38 assemble_integer & align Denis Chertykov
00:10 The Program that Actually Works successnow

September 21, 2001
22:11 Àô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X±MÃD¬ã¨s³ø§i gd168
21:26 Re: Unable to generate reloads Joern Rennecke
21:16 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Joern Rennecke
21:16 Re: Unable to generate reloads Joern Rennecke
19:14 Gcc - c4x using TMS320C32 Michael Hayes
19:11 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Michael Hayes
19:00 Newbie wants to install gcc on windows 98 Robert Allan Schwartz
17:12 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Ian Roxborough
16:51 Re: shared library, init Marc Espie
16:44 Successful build of 3.0.1 on ia64-unknown-linux Janis Johnson
16:03 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Janis Johnson
15:18 problem with function trees Dave Morse
14:54 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Fergus Henderson
14:47 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Fergus Henderson
14:37 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Dale Johannesen
14:09 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Per Bothner
14:06 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Dale Johannesen
13:53 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Phil Edwards
13:21 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
13:21 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
12:57 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Dale Johannesen
12:56 Re: bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages David Edelsohn
12:47 bootstrap failure on darwin, compare stages Andreas Tobler
12:10 Re: gcc problem mike stump
11:07 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Richard Henderson
11:06 Re: Your patch of August 2 to osf.h Rainer Orth
10:48 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Morten Welinder
10:36 Re: Reentering sections Richard Henderson
10:12 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Benjamin Kosnik
10:02 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Andrew Cagney
07:37 Re: basic block reordering + java Andrew Haley
07:33 Re: basic block reordering + java Jakub Jelinek
07:30 basic block reordering + java Andrew Haley
07:26 basic block reordering + java Anthony Green
06:09 Unable to generate reloads Lars Brinkhoff
05:22 Reentering sections Roman Lechtchinsky
03:41 Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 source code Gerald Pfeifer
03:36 Re: Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Gerald Pfeifer
02:46 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Gabriel Paubert
02:27 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Martin Kahlert
02:08 gcc 2.7.2.3 source code Kubinger Wilfried
01:13 Target mips64vr4100 (i386-hosted cross compiler) Pontus Lidman

September 20, 2001
18:58 ISA mismatch for GCC-3.0.1 william
18:55 Re: dynamic PIC register? David Edelsohn
18:11 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
18:04 Re: Strange Warnings Zack Weinberg
18:01 gcc problem mouhcin chergou
18:00 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Zack Weinberg
17:28 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
17:20 dynamic PIC register? dalej
16:37 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Richard Henderson
16:25 Re: X86-64 setup/configure support patch Richard Henderson
15:55 Tcl/Tk update on the upgrade... Ian Roxborough
15:36 Re: Problem: delete_dead_jumptables and constant pool references Ulrich Weigand
15:33 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Geoff Keating
15:17 Re: Problem: delete_dead_jumptables and constant pool references Richard Henderson
15:14 Re: Problem: delete_dead_jumptables and constant pool references Ulrich Weigand
14:59 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Neil Booth
14:06 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
12:47 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Per Bothner
12:34 Re: Proposal Russ Allbery
12:11 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Frank Klemm
12:03 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Morten Welinder
11:56 [RFC] Adding some rpath support. Theodore Papadopoulo
11:43 Re: Relaxing -Wsign-compare Neil Booth
11:38 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Neil Booth
11:17 Re: Proposal Kai Henningsen
11:10 ïÔ×ÅÔ ÎÁ ÚÁÐÒÏÓ Ï ÐÒÏÄÁÖÅ É ÐÏËÕÐËÅ ÐÒÏÄÕËÃÉÉ Âçàèìîâûãäíîå ñîòðóäíè÷åñòâî.
10:54 Re: Which egcs ? mike stump
10:43 Re: GCC mike stump
09:44 Re: Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Per Bothner
09:40 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
08:48 Re: Documentation Florian Weimer
08:45 Relaxing -Wsign-compare Morten Welinder
08:43 Re: X86-64 setup/configure support patch Bo Thorsen
08:17 Re: freopen function Phil Edwards
08:05 Re: freebsd 4.4 and gcc 3.0 problem David Edelsohn
07:47 freebsd 4.4 and gcc 3.0 problem Benjamin Gross
07:06 New dynamic linker name Bo Thorsen
05:12 Why is $prefix/include not inside cpp searchpath? Martin Kahlert
04:51 Îòâåò íà çàïðîñ î ïðîäàæå è ïîêóïêå ïðîäóêöèè Âçàèìîâûãäíîå ñîòðóäíè÷åñòâî.
04:21 X86-64 setup/configure support patch Bo Thorsen
03:56 question about g++ ver. 2.95.2 Stefanie.Steinert
02:04 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Franz Sirl
01:57 freopen function Michael Nabarro

September 19, 2001
23:15 Re: Documentation Marc Espie
22:39 Re: Which egcs ? Per Bothner
22:23 Re: Loop optimiser upgrade (Was RFC: BB duplication code) Joern Rennecke
21:53 Re: 16 bit jump tables for -Oss - code Joern Rennecke
21:44 Re: SUBREG problems Joern Rennecke
20:52 c++ cast bug ? John Levon
20:23 Re: Which egcs ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier
18:10 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
17:15 GCC Jimmy X. Jia
16:45 Re: GCC Joern Rennecke
16:31 Re: GCC Joern Rennecke
14:51 Re: Documentation Joseph S. Myers
14:44 Re: Documentation dewar
14:31 Documentation Frank Klemm
13:40 Strange Warnings Frank Klemm
13:38 Re: Proposal Joe Buck
13:36 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
13:10 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
12:44 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
12:37 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
12:21 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls DJ Delorie
11:50 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Joe Buck
11:28 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joe Buck
11:18 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Joe Buck
10:50 Re: GCC mike stump
09:56 Re: GCC Frank Klemm
09:50 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Janis Johnson
07:05 Re: GCC Joern Rennecke
06:30 Gcc - c4x using TMS320C32 Thomas ku
05:37 GCC thomas joseph
05:04 shared library, init Roger Wells
04:19 Re: new front-end: ksi + few questions Michal Moskal
02:44 Re: Proposal dewar
02:41 Re: Proposal Richard Earnshaw
02:34 Re: Proposal dewar
02:23 Re: Proposal Tim Hollebeek
01:14 Re: Proposal Joseph S. Myers
00:06 Re: Proposal dewar
00:02 Re: Proposal Neil Booth

September 18, 2001
23:01 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
22:37 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
22:23 Re: new front-end: ksi + few questions Fergus Henderson
22:20 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
22:19 Re: Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
19:05 Successful Build of GCC 3.0.1 Shannon Koh
18:49 Great business & scientific charts for your reports & your website information@grapl.com
17:36 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Kenner
17:15 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.0.1 on i386-pc-solaris2.6 Janis Johnson
16:59 Re: Proposal Russ Allbery
16:56 Re: register parameter passing and library calls Alan Lehotsky
16:31 Re: Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu David Wheeler
16:30 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Marc Espie
16:27 Successful build of gcc-3.0.1 on i386-pc-solaris2.6 Chris DuPuis
16:23 Re: Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Phil Edwards
16:18 Re: patch tracking Marc Espie
16:08 Problems bootstrapping on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu David Wheeler
15:57 Re: building binutils with gcc Phil Edwards
15:55 Re: Proposal Toon Moene
15:48 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
15:35 Re: Proposal Robert Lipe
14:22 Re: register parameter passing and library calls Joern Rennecke
12:34 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joseph S. Myers
12:30 Re: Proposal dewar
12:23 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
11:54 Re: Loop unroll fixes mike stump
11:37 Re: Proposal Kevin Handy
11:21 Re: Which egcs ? mike stump
11:14 Re: Proposal Joseph S. Myers
11:06 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
10:47 Re: Loop unroll fixes Benjamin Kosnik
10:25 Re: OpenMP implementation Zack Weinberg
10:21 Re: Proposal Zack Weinberg
10:02 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
09:58 Re: GCC 3.0.2 Richard Henderson
09:49 Re: patch tracking dewar
09:48 Re: Proposal Frank Klemm
09:32 Re: Proposal dewar
09:08 OpenMP implementation Ariel Gonzalez
09:06 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Mark Mitchell
09:03 Re: GCC + Checher Joe Buck
07:54 Pointer-to-member type matching in template class Andrew J. Malton
07:42 Re: loading shared libreries Jeff Sturm
07:07 loading shared libreries Roger Wells
06:34 register parameter passing and library calls apl
06:33 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Marc Espie
06:29 Re: GCC 3.0.2 Marc Espie
05:28 Re: (Finding) A Logo for GCC Gerald Pfeifer
05:13 global data in shared libraries Roger Wells
04:44 Re: RFA: Deprecate C++ options Joseph S. Myers
04:16 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Kenner
03:57 Re: Anyway to get compile flags from objects? dewar
03:52 GCC + Checher Flavius Bindea
02:30 Re: Proposal Joseph S. Myers
02:19 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joseph S. Myers
00:34 òåëìáíá :-)

September 17, 2001
23:27 GCC 3.0.2 Mark Mitchell
20:25 Which egcs ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier
17:45 gcc-ss-20010917 is now available law
17:40 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question mike stump
17:22 Re: Loop unroll fixes Mark Mitchell
16:23 Re: removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Daniel Berlin
16:22 Re: Start and end of the GOT Richard Henderson
16:20 Re: host_integerp vs [] decls Richard Henderson
16:08 Re: Start and end of the GOT H . J . Lu
16:06 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit H . J . Lu
16:04 Re: removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Richard Henderson
16:00 Re: Proposal Neil Booth
15:57 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Jakub Jelinek
15:56 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: Start and end of the GOT Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit H . J . Lu
15:52 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Jakub Jelinek
15:50 Re: Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Richard Henderson
15:47 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
15:41 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Richard Henderson
15:36 Re: Start and end of the GOT Jakub Jelinek
15:27 Re: What's bringing these symbols in??? mike stump
15:17 Re: Start and end of the GOT Richard Henderson
15:11 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Henderson
14:24 Re: Loop unroll fixes Joe Buck
13:16 Re: Loop unroll fixes Richard Henderson
11:32 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #3 H . J . Lu
11:31 Using alloca (or stmt exprs) as a function call argument is bad? Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:23 Re: What's bringing these symbols in??? Benjamin Kosnik
09:52 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #3 Marcel Ruff
09:44 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Ulrich Weigand
09:06 Re: Autobuild at NetWinder.org will be going away Rod Stewart
08:57 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 H . J . Lu
08:55 Re: Proposal Thomas R. Truscott
08:41 Re: Anyway to get compile flags from objects? Phil Edwards
08:32 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Phil Edwards
07:25 Êîììåð÷åñêîå ïðåäëîæåíèå. Oleg_atl
07:12 Re: removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Daniel Berlin
06:58 removing unused NOTE_INSN notes? Jan Hubicka
06:41 Re: Anyway to get compile flags from objects? Christoph Maurer
06:34 Anyway to get compile flags from objects? nbecker
01:00 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 Marcel Ruff

September 16, 2001
22:13 EARN MONEY the LEGAL & EASY way! MUST READ!!! ezdough
19:34 What's bringing these symbols in??? Benjamin Scherrey
18:55 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit Ralf Baechle
18:19 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question DJ Delorie
15:50 Re: linker problem: relocation truncated to fit H . J . Lu
15:04 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Joe Buck
14:46 Re: patch tracking Joe Buck
14:33 Re: empowering the steering committee (was Re: patch tracking) Joe Buck
14:14 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question David Edelsohn
13:01 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Gerald Pfeifer
12:41 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Rod Stewart
12:24 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Andreas Jaeger
11:46 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Richard Kenner
11:23 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Gerald Pfeifer
11:22 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Toon Moene
11:17 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Mark Mitchell
11:16 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Andreas Jaeger
11:07 Re: Autobuild at NetWinder.org will be going away Joseph S. Myers
11:02 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Gerald Pfeifer
10:59 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Mark Mitchell
09:20 Re: PATCH for Re: Autobuild at NewWinder.org will be going away Matt Kraai
09:13 Re: Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 H . J . Lu
08:38 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Richard Kenner
08:35 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Daniel Berlin
06:39 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Richard Kenner
06:18 Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux #2 Marcel Ruff
06:08 Static initializer in shared libraries on Linux Marcel Ruff
06:04 Re: MAINTAINERS policy question Ulrich Weigand
04:23 about you website Christi