This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libg++ and libstdc++
- To: Yung Yi <yiyung at togabi dot com>
- Subject: Re: libg++ and libstdc++
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:46:37 -0400
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <001c01c13146$04549b90$6401a8c0@RamZone>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 08:22:08PM +0900, Yung Yi wrote:
> I'm wondering what the difference btn libg++ and libstdc++ is.
libg++ is very old and should not be used.
For more, see http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC