This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cross compiling for VxWorks
- To: francis dot michel at criltechnology dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: cross compiling for VxWorks
- From: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Francis Michel <email@example.com>
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:09:27 +0200
> About these patches, what's their purpose?
Standard Answer 103: The purpose of a patch is to either fix a bug, or
add functionality that isn't already present.
> and why aren't they integrated in CVS ??
Standard Answer 429: Some need cleaning up, some need reenineering,
some need reintegration work done, some aren't needed any more, and
some just await some time for people to work on them.
> And of course I'd like to see them, whatever version they may be
I'll send them out directly to you. At 1.5M for just the gcc sub
directory diffs, I don't want to burden everyone here.
> genfixes scans specs and generates substitutions for all defines
> (not starting with '_'). For example if specs say -DCPU=xxxx,
> What's your opinion ?
Hard problem, hard solution. We get by, by always having a -DCPU on
the command line anyway. This is part of the wrsGenMultilib