This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch] C++ inlining heuristics changed (3.0.1)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: [Patch] C++ inlining heuristics changed (3.0.1)
- From: "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel at ginac dot de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:36:25 +0200 (CEST)
- cc: Kurt Garloff <kurt at garloff dot de>, Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Reply-To: Richard dot Kreckel at ginac dot de
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > I just bootstrapped successfully with Kurt's patch applied and tested it
> > on the benchmarks in GiNaC's suite of regression tests. Run-time
> > performance was somewhere between inline-limit 3000 and 4000 as seen
> > before, i.e. close to maximum, so this looks good. File-size was actually
> > slightly smaller than any I have seen before. (But as to compile-time it
> > seems that we are not very sensitive, they varied only about 10%.)
> Compared to 3.0.1?
Yes. With "as seen before" I meant compared to vanilla 3.0.1 compiling
the application with --finline-limit=<n> or without (i.e. 600).
Richard B. Kreckel