This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bug in complex::norm
| The fact that it is not required to work doesn't mean we should
| intentionally choose an implementation that doesn't for no good
Certainly. But your assertion that the implementation was wrong is,
err, simply wrong.
| complex<int> is very important for my work in Digital Signal
I'm not disputing that. You said the implementation was wrong, but
there was no requirement that complex<> should work -- and I think we
should allow it to work.