This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/4047: assuming & on overloaded member functions
Nathan Sidwell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > "Yu Zhang/CanWest/IBM" <email@example.com> writes:
| > | Hi Phil,
| > |
| > | Thank you very much. It does work! But I'm confused,
| > | which one is C++ standard?
| > | server.use(T::foo); or server.use(&T::foo); ?
| > &T::foo.
| This is correct to pointer to (non-static) member function. In Yu's
| case, T::foo is a static member, so the & is optional.
I stand corrected. I missed the 'static' bit.
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com