This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: autoconf and gcc 3.0.1

To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>
Subject: Re: autoconf and gcc 3.0.1
From: Stefan Seefeld <seefeld at sympatico dot ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:13:05 -0500
CC: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <3B81D667.7000104@sympatico.ca> <20010820231916.B10469@mediaone.net>

hi Craig,

thanks for the reply, even though it doesn't answer my question
directly. I do know where the two exit declarations come from.
What I wanted to know is whether it is correct to refuse the
extern void exit(int) declaration , as this comes from autoconf.
If it is indeed wrong, this means that autoconf contains a bug,
so I should mail them, instead of this list.


The problem at hand is that I can't configure my package while
using gcc 3.0.1. I can of course modify the acgeneral.m4 file,
but that's of course not a solution, just a temporary work-around.

Thanks,
		Stefan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: autoconf and gcc 3.0.1
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- autoconf and gcc 3.0.1
  - From: Stefan Seefeld
- Re: autoconf and gcc 3.0.1
  - From: Craig Rodrigues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]