This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: obstack master source?
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: obstack master source?
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:59:56 -0400
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010816223330.A12456@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:33:30PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> Is the master source code for obstacks libiberty or glibc?
When I was writing a prototype libiberty manual, I think I learned that
glibc is the master source. There are a few other pieces of libiberty taken
from glibc; once a module/routine passes some kind of mimimum usefulness
threshold, it gets copied to libiberty. :-)
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC