This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A (minor) doc problem?
On Aug 15, 2001, Jack Lloyd <lloyd@acm.jhu.edu> wrote:
> In the GCC 3.0 info pages, the option -finline-limits is documented as
> controlling how large of a function is inlined for functions explicetely
> marked as being inline. However, it seems like this actually controls the
> inlining of all functions
I doubt it. Do you have a code snippet and a command-line that would
demonstrate the problem? Make sure you're not using -O3, because this
implies -finline.
> BTW, has anyone succesfully built GCC 3.0 on Linux/SPARC32 (Redhat
> 6.2)?
I'm not sure I did, but I had been testing it on the few weeks before
the final release. I'm giving it a try on this week's snapshot right
now too.
> mknumeric_limits failed,
Oh, I recall this problem. It affected a subset of sparc32 boxes, and
is fixed for 3.0.1.
> some code was looking for strcmp and friends and couldn't find them,
I don't recall this one.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me