This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
What about gcc-3.0.1-20010813 libiberty testresults failure on cygwin?
- To: "gcc" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: What about gcc-3.0.1-20010813 libiberty testresults failure on cygwin?
- From: Christian Jönsson <christian dot jonsson at foi dot se>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:42:54 +0200
- Organization: Sweden's Defence Research Agency
In the recent gcc-3.0.1-20010813/libiberty/testsuite/regress-demangle
I get the following "failures" on a win2k/sp2 with an up to date cygwin
install:
/bin/sh ../../../gcc-3.0.1-20010813/libiberty/testsuite/regress-demangle
../../../gcc-3.0.1-20010813/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
FAIL: --format=gnu _10PageButton\$__both
result: _10PageButton\$__both
expected: PageButton::__both
FAIL: --format=gnu _3RNG\$singleMantissa
result: _3RNG\$singleMantissa
expected: RNG::singleMantissa
FAIL: --format=gnu _5IComp\$_release
result: _5IComp\$_release
expected: IComp::_release
FAIL: --format=gnu _\$_10BitmapComp
result: _\$_10BitmapComp
expected: BitmapComp::~BitmapComp(void)
FAIL: --format=gnu _\$_9__io_defs
result: _\$_9__io_defs
expected: __io_defs::~__io_defs(void)
FAIL: --format=gnu _\$_Q23foo3bar
result: _\$_Q23foo3bar
expected: foo::bar::~bar(void)
FAIL: --format=gnu _\$_Q33foo3bar4bell
result: _\$_Q33foo3bar4bell
expected: foo::bar::bell::~bell(void)
FAIL: --format=gnu _vt\$foo
result: virtual table\$foo
expected: foo virtual table
FAIL: --format=gnu _vt\$foo\$bar
result: virtual table\$foo\$bar
expected: foo::bar virtual table
FAIL: --format=gnu _2T4\$N
result: _2T4\$N
expected: T4::N
FAIL: --format=gnu _Q22T42t1\$N
result: _Q22T42t1\$N
expected: T4::t1::N
FAIL: --format=gnu _\$_t6vector1Zdi
result: _\$_t6vector1Zdi
expected: vector<double>::~vector(int)
FAIL: --format=gnu _\$_t6vector1Zii
result: _\$_t6vector1Zii
expected: vector<int>::~vector(int)
FAIL: --format=gnu _GLOBAL_\$D\$set
result: _GLOBAL_\$D\$set
expected: global destructors keyed to set
FAIL: --format=gnu _GLOBAL_\$I\$set
result: _GLOBAL_\$I\$set
expected: global constructors keyed to set
FAIL: --format=gnu _vt\$t8BDDHookV1ZPc
result: virtual table\$t8BDDHookV1ZPc
expected: BDDHookV<char *> virtual table
FAIL: --format=gnu _26_GLOBAL_\$N\$_tmp_n.iilg4Gya\$app_instance
result: _26_GLOBAL_\$N\$_tmp_n.iilg4Gya\$app_instance
expected: {anonymous}::app_instance
17 of 645 tests failed
Is this to be expected? (It's been like this all the time I have tried...)
Is this something that *could* be made work? (Is it "needed"?)
Cheers,
/ChJ