This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
- To: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:40:22 +0200 (CEST)
- cc: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, <jason at redhat dot com>, Stefan Westerfeld <stefan at space dot twc dot de>, <simong at oz dot agile dot tv>
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Hmm, I'm not very happy with it. Remember this is a regression from gcc-2.95
> and was reported before 3.0 was released. IF we release 3.0.1 without KDE2
> being fixed, I would suggest that fixing that bug [...]
Which version of GCC do we want GNU/Linux distributors to use?
If GCC 3.0 and 3.0.1 are not able to compile a working KDE2, distributors
either will have to stick with GCC 2.95.2 or use a hacked GCC 3.0.1 or
roll their own release.
Red Hat probably is going to do the latter anyway (SPARC64 alone requires
this, AFAIK), but most other distributors like Debian will have more
problems, and in any case this is bound to cause fragmentation and
If a fix for this problem as availabe soon after 3.0.1, I'd be in favor of
rolling 3.0.2 ahead of schedule.
Gerald "Jerry" firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/