This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- To: gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- From: Nick Ing-Simmons <nick at ing-simmons dot net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:41:27 +0100
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, aoliva at redhat dot com, tprince at computer dot org, dewar at gnat dot com, torvalds at transmeta dot com, moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net, Joern Rennecke <amylaar at redhat dot com>
- References: <200107310443.f6V4hdh09169@phal.cambridge.redhat.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-To: Nick Ing-Simmons <nick at ing-simmons dot net>
Gabriel Dos Reis <email@example.com> writes:
>Joern Rennecke <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>| > That said, I don't mind about -fdubious-math as far as it is not the
>| > default, nor turned on at any level of optimization.
>| For a user, it's hard to guess or remember user that -fdubious-math
>| and -ffast-math are related. How about -ffast-and-loose-math ?
>I was actually proposing to rename -ffast-math to -fdubious-math :-)
>but your proposal has also my support :-))