This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ compile-time regressions
- To: "aoliva at redhat dot com" <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: C++ compile-time regressions
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:38:22 -0700
- cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Thursday, August 02, 2001 04:25:22 PM -0300 "firstname.lastname@example.org"
> I suppose it would be desirable to inline pretty much the
> same functions, regardless of the target.
Yes, I suppose -- although if a function really is going to take up
twice as much icache on one platform as another, it might be a less
promising inlining candidate.
If you run some numbers and can show it's a win, then I think that's
good. I wouldn't commit it without demonstrating the win, though.
Mark Mitchell email@example.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com