This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine)
- To: Gabriel Dos_Reis <gdosreis at sophia dot inria dot fr>
- Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine)
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at transmeta dot com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 10:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Tim Hollebeek <tim at hollebeek dot com>, Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, <dewar at gnat dot com>, <amylaar at redhat dot com>, <aoliva at redhat dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net>, <tprince at computer dot org>
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:
> | Now, show me a case where a/b/c -> a/(b*c) is significantly less accurate?
> On a 64-bit double processor just take
Oooh.. Quoting me out-of-context.
Please bother to read the next line in my email and not snip it off.
Your arguments are getting weaker and weaker, and dishonest to boot.