This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Strange behaviour gcc 3.0

Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:

> At 15:27 01.08.2001, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > BTW, why do we need this at all in the glibc sources? gcc-3.0 can
>> > optimize printf the same way as fprintf, I don't see any advantages of
>> > this #define...
>>
>>Feel free to send a patch for GCC to replace printf (...) with fprintf
>>(stdout,...).  I expect that glibc will remove the macro in this case,
> 
> No, I'll send a patch to delete this #define in bits/stdio.h, unless
> you can explain me why it is advantageous to have it, because gcc-3.0
> can optimize _both_ printf and fprintf.

It can?  Please go ahead and send the patch for glibc,

Thanks,
Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]