This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Simple returns are broken in gcc 3.X

To: John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
Subject: Re: Simple returns are broken in gcc 3.X
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:15:39 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010730193023.B3507@redhat.com> <200107310335.f6V3Zj8Z026504@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:35:45PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better then to never output a simple return in
> expand_null_return_1?

Err, yes it would.  There's another bit in expand_function_end.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple returns are broken in gcc 3.X
  - From: John David Anglin

References:
- Re: Simple returns are broken in gcc 3.X
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Simple returns are broken in gcc 3.X
  - From: John David Anglin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]