This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 31 Jul 2001 00:19:08 -0300
- Cc: dewar at gnat dot com, amylaar at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net, torvalds at transmeta dot com, tprince at computer dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20010731024546.2A8E2F2B53@nile.gnat.com><fl7kwp950m.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
On Jul 31, 2001, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> dewar@gnat.com writes:
> | > ({a+b;})*c
> |
> | OK, I admit, the (( .. )) suggestion was not the most awful one after all :-)
> :-)
> The idea that GCC should require users to jump through hoops, using
> non-standard constructs in order to have their programs interpreted
> according to standard rules is just frightening.
Aren't we talking about -ffast-math?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me