This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com
- Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 31 Jul 2001 05:00:41 +0200
- Cc: amylaar at redhat dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net, torvalds at transmeta dot com, tprince at computer dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <20010731024546.2A8E2F2B53@nile.gnat.com>
dewar@gnat.com writes:
| > ({a+b;})*c
|
| OK, I admit, the (( .. )) suggestion was not the most awful one after all :-)
:-)
The idea that GCC should require users to jump through hoops, using
non-standard constructs in order to have their programs interpreted
according to standard rules is just frightening.
-- Gaby