This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: a .NET alternative (GJC et al)

To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: a .NET alternative (GJC et al)
From: Tom Lord <lord at regexps dot com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 15:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107291043190.29967-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>


[about exact GC:]

       Tromey:
       > 	At least, we're interested if it can improve performance.  

       Lord:
       > Please don't gloss over robustness.  Accurate GC is important for
       > that, too.


       Sturm:
       By "robustness" I assume you mean a reasonable upper bound on
       heap size. 

That is one issue.

The robustness problems are much larger than just that one issue.

-t

Follow-Ups:
- Re: a .NET alternative (GJC et al)
  - From: Fergus Henderson

References:
- Re: a .NET alternative (GJC et al)
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]