This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
- To: jthorn at galileo dot thp dot univie dot ac dot at, torvalds at transmeta dot com
- Subject: Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
- From: dewar at gnat dot com
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:42:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
<<My argument is really the same, but with a twist: keep it alive, but
don't make it the default if it makes non-FP code bigger.
>>
It is always tricky to argue about defaults. One critical issue with defaults
is to make benchmarks work better out of the box, but the default of -O0
seriously undermines this design criterion in any case.