This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
- To: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
- Subject: Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
- From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 11:17:05 -0400
- cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
>>>>> Marc Espie writes:
Marc> In article <20010705163930.A29149@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> you write:
>> 2.95.3 + peephole to handle stack adjustment, backported from current:
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 espie wheel 3994332 Jul 5 16:08 bsd
>> 3.0:
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 espie wheel 4068067 Jul 5 16:35 bsd
>> Exact same source. Both are using -O2 -Os to compile.
Marc> Hum, this is weird... the corresponding object sizes are not that far...
Marc> Anyone has any idea as to a linking issue that may explain that problem ?
Alignment? Libraries (does OpenBSD link with libgcc.a?)?
David