This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size

To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
From: Marc Espie <espie at schutzenberger dot liafa dot jussieu dot fr>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 17:12:12 +0200
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200107051451.QAA15996@quatramaran.ens.fr> <200107051507.f65F7gu04716@phal.cambridge.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Marc dot Espie at liafa dot jussieu dot fr

On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:07:42PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> > Anyone has any idea as to a linking issue that may explain that problem ?
> 
> The shared libgcc contains a lot of functions that are never used.

static binary. In fact -nostdlib, I forgot to say (bsd kernel).

References:
- Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
  - From: Joern Rennecke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]