This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size
- From: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:51:53 +0200
- Organization: Ecole Normale Superieure (quatramaran)
In article <20010705163930.A29149@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> you write:
>2.95.3 + peephole to handle stack adjustment, backported from current:
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 espie wheel 3994332 Jul 5 16:08 bsd
>3.0:
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 espie wheel 4068067 Jul 5 16:35 bsd
>Exact same source. Both are using -O2 -Os to compile.
Hum, this is weird... the corresponding object sizes are not that far...
Anyone has any idea as to a linking issue that may explain that problem ?